AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
No sexual comments relating to minors.
I would think that's pretty clear.
I would think that's pretty clear.
The Rule
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not a lawyer, but in context of the whole paragraph it's detailing comments of posters against other posters. You and I can post about Pedo Don all day long but if anyone even hints about us being like Pedo Don, it's a violation.
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
OTOH, you can advocate tightening the rule up on the complaint section but I think it's fine as is....and not just because I'm biased about my Pedo Don memes.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
And yet it requires a news article. Also there's this: "nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped".
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Again, all in the context, from my reading, that it applies to posters on posters not Pedo Don bending Ivanka over in his limo whenever he felt like it.
BTW, according to evidence related to Stormy Daniels, although Pedo Don technically molested Ivanka as a child, when she was 18, she was still a virgin.
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Maybe if we just stuck to talking about actual political stuff instead of this scurrilous and vague 12b stuff, we wouldn't have to worry about how and who defines the rules? Just a thought.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Maybe if we just stuck to talking about actual political stuff instead of this scurrilous and vague 12b stuff, we wouldn't have to worry about how and who defines the rules? Just a thought.
Agreed on it being vague. We need a real lawyer. Maybe we'll ask our resident JPP legal expert Jarod?
There is too much sexual abuse of minors, and too much pushing of sexualizing kids, especially from the left, for that rule to work.
Not if this is to be a Free Mind/Free Speech zone.
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
I don't think he deals in that sort of law. It's like medicine these days -- everyone specializes.
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
"The Left" fires ITS sexual predators. But you guys on the Reichwing? You make them IMPOTUSx2.
But yeah, sure, pretend that you're still the party of "family values."
Melchizedek = Michael
Verified User
Only Coal miners
Minors? Is that 'Under 21'?
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
And their daughters of legal age.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Yeah but, you're a simpleton and a jock sniffer so your opinion doesn't really mean anything.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Sniff my ripe underwear.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
No. I don't want to take your thing from you. Have at it.
A typo will end up in a 12b ban.
Melchizedek = Michael
Verified User
See ya when you get back.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
I don't personally see the need for any rules of any kind.
JPP is an insane asylum.
Why single out one particular strain of insanity?
JPP is an insane asylum.
Why single out one particular strain of insanity?
Happy Sunday, Mason.