The Scotus agrees the republican party cheats in elections

and you people wonder why the news only reports certain things?


Look at you fools self editing FACTS from your own brains
The ruling was 30 fucking years ago, fool

This in recent.
This report reveals the Left’s vote fraud strategy for the 2012 elections. Like a KGB operation, it is thorough, multi-faceted and redundant. It has overt and covert, illegal and legal elements, the latter of which are designed, at least in part, to facilitate illegal activities later. It is a deliberate, premeditated, comprehensive plan to win the 2012 presidential election at all costs, and is in keeping with the organizational methods, associations and ethics of the Community-Organizer-in-Chief, Barack Obama.

http://tinyurl.com/82ydcmc

A total of four Democratic officials and political operatives have now pleaded guilty to voter fraud-related felony charges in an alleged scheme to steal a New York election.

Former Troy Democratic City Clerk William McInerney, Democratic Councilman John Brown, and Democratic political operatives Anthony Renna and Anthony DeFiglio have entered guilty pleas in the case, in which numerous signatures were allegedly forged on absentee ballots in the 2009 Working Families Party primary, the political party that was associated with the now-defunct community group, ACORN.

http://tinyurl.com/82ydcmc

(2012) The son of Rep. Jim Moran(D) has resigned from his father's campaign for apparently condoning voter fraud.The latest involves the son of US Rep. James Moran (D) of Virginia – Patrick Moran, Representative Moran’s campaign field director – shown on a secretly taped video apparently discussing a plan to use forged documents to cast ballots for 100 registered voters who seldom vote

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Electi...fraud-in-Election-2012-How-common-is-it-video

More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters.

• Approximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state.

• About 12 million records have incorrect addresses, meaning either the voters moved, or errors in the information make it unlikely any mailings can reach them.

This is over 16,000,000 potential fraudulent votes...
 
why does the right pretend these FACTS don't exist?


why do they pretend its CRAZY to talk about court documented cases that the SCOTUS finds perfectly CORRECT?


because the right in this country refuses FACTS when it suits them
 
All the ruling does is allow cheating by dems by not allowing voter id, you are not even a good spin artist

yet another idiot who now hates a SCOTUS for admitting the republican party cheats in elections and NEEDS to be watched and CAUGHT for it
 
so you hate the Supreme court of the united states ?


why did they not take the case and SAVE your republican party?

Because they read the case and saw the evidence and your party is GUILTY as hell
 
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justic...rieve-for-GOP-in-voting-rights-consent-decree


why do all you right wing people pretend this reality is not reality?






The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up a request by the Republican National Committee to lift a 30-year-old consent decree that restricts the political party’s ability to enforce preelection ballot security programs that critics say would result in minority voter suppression.



are you going to have them removed for NOT protecting your cheating assed party?
 
Imagine how you might be able to figure out what is going on in the world if you were willing to accept the real facts
 
did she take that issue all the way to the SCOTUS?


you see just pretending facts are not real doesn't make your party honest.

It just makes you just as dishonest as the people your now trying to cover for.



You see Americans dont like a cheater.


so they no longer like your party unless they approve of cheating
 
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justic...rieve-for-GOP-in-voting-rights-consent-decree


why do all you right wing people pretend this reality is not reality?






The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up a request by the Republican National Committee to lift a 30-year-old consent decree that restricts the political party’s ability to enforce preelection ballot security programs that critics say would result in minority voter suppression.



what does it serve you to pretend this is NOT the history of your party?
 
just saying "I know you are but what am I" is not evidence of what you claim.


The two partys do NOT have a similar record.


lying about that doesn't prove it
 
just saying "I know you are but what am I" is not evidence of what you claim.


The two partys do NOT have a similar record.


lying about that doesn't prove it

lol, really? You don't know your party's history very well do you?
 
Back
Top