Gomer,
You can feed an AR 15 500 rounds per minute? Who would thunk?
You really don't need even the rubber band if you want to save the environment as your belt loop will work fine.
“ The Supreme Court upholds a gun control law”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
You can feed an AR 15 500 rounds per minute? Who would thunk?
You really don't need even the rubber band if you want to save the environment as your belt loop will work fine.
Full auto firearms are not banned.
You just skipped over the judicial part of that, ay? Genius. If you ignore what people say you can just pretend what you want them to have said is what they said and argue that. Yeah, it is a logical fallacy and everyone will notice that you can't think well, but it's soooo much easier arguing about stuff if you ignore at least half of what was said and fill in the blanks with wishes.“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal gun control law that is intended to protect victims of domestic violence.”
“In their first Second Amendment case since they expanded gun rights in 2022, the justices ruled 8-1 in favor of a 1994 ban on firearms for people under restraining orders to stay away from their spouses or partners. The justices reversed a ruling from the federal appeals court in New Orleans that had struck down the law.”
“Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court, said the law uses “common sense” and applies only “after a judge determines that an individual poses a credible threat” of physical violence.”
The Supreme Court upholds a gun control law intended to protect domestic violence victims
The justices reversed a ruling from the federal appeals court in New Orleans that had struck down the law.apnews.com
Wait a minute, so now “common sense” is suddenly the denominator in SCOTUS decisions? Common sense doesn’t dictate that bump stocks are a rapid-fire gun accessory that makes it easier to shoot more people quicker as Steven Paddock displayed? So much for the Originalism/Textualism facade
And what do the gun nuts think now that their Court has just ruled that the Second Amendment can be regulated? That gun rights aren’t any more absolute than any other right in the Constitution?
The decision was always a given, this Court was never going to decide otherwise and give Democrats another issue to echo in the upcoming election
They are severely limited. Class 3 licenses and stuff. It is illegal for most folks to own one.
Not at all. You just need to file the papers and have a butload of money to pay for one.
Not sure about the rules here so,
Here, Let Me Google That For You
Passive-aggressively teach your friends how to Google. For all those people who find it more convenient to ask you rather than search it themselves. Not associated with Google.
googlethatforyou.com
You couldn't carry 500 rounds.
I can file and hone the bolt catch to fire repeatedly. Big deal.
The president didn’t ban bumpstocks. ATF changed their regulations, which they have the authority to do, to include bumpstocks. The right thing to do considering their lethality.
The conservative court said they overstepped their authority with Thomas laughably claiming that bumpstocks “don’t change a thing”.
Derp
any manufactured after the date of legislation are banned from civilians owning them.
again the point is legislation - not executive action
Derp. Derp.
No argument, but thousands upon thousands are still available to the public. They are mostly useless as they are very hard to control, most of them jam very easily, and it costs a fortune to feed them.
“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal gun control law that is intended to protect victims of domestic violence.”
“In their first Second Amendment case since they expanded gun rights in 2022, the justices ruled 8-1 in favor of a 1994 ban on firearms for people under restraining orders to stay away from their spouses or partners. The justices reversed a ruling from the federal appeals court in New Orleans that had struck down the law.”
“Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court, said the law uses “common sense” and applies only “after a judge determines that an individual poses a credible threat” of physical violence.”
The Supreme Court upholds a gun control law intended to protect domestic violence victims
The justices reversed a ruling from the federal appeals court in New Orleans that had struck down the law.
Wait a minute, so now “common sense” is suddenly the denominator in SCOTUS decisions? Common sense doesn’t dictate that bump stocks are a rapid-fire gun accessory that makes it easier to shoot more people quicker as Steven Paddock displayed? So much for the Originalism/Textualism facade
And what do the gun nuts think now that their Court has just ruled that the Second Amendment can be regulated? That gun rights aren’t any more absolute than any other right in the Constitution?
The decision was always a given, this Court was never going to decide otherwise and give Democrats another issue to echo in the upcoming election
So, no matter what they do, you're going to cry like a little baby. Leftists are the most ignorant whiners on the planet.
Yes, your posts usually are full of it.
....because you say so (while stomping your tiny little feet)
No, but I did qualify on the M50 machine gun, does that count
Always comical when the gun huggers try to outflank others employing gun semantics and technology
The ATF is an agent of the president. the ATF can't have authority the president does not have
no, they don't have the authority to do. this is the retard left trying to circumvent the three branches - and you were told to go fuck off. so go fuck off
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Yep, David Letterman was ruled a threat. His stalker took out a restraining order on HIM!
Restraining orders can be filed simply on an ALLEGED crime such as emotional abuse. Sometimes they are used in DIVORCE as a tactical move to gain leverage. So an innocent man can have his firearms confiscated!
And restraining orders do not work more than half the time. Maybe it is the Restraining order process that needs to be reexamined here.