Times Retracts Lies and Smears

LadyT said:
I understood your reference completely. Aparently you didn't understand mine. Please post specifically where I said he wasn't responding to the aforementioned. If that is what I said I'd like to have the chance to retract or clarify. If I didn't say anything of the sort and you're pulling out of your ass, I will call you on it.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...


I never saw you claim anywhere that Paul "didn't respond" to the receipt of the skinhead's money..
 
Giving the money back is not relevant to your claim. You said...

LOL, so now I'm a liar/fool because I believe the news and you chose to believe his campaign manager? That's fine tool. Continue rationalizing that keepign the money was a good idea and that RP's camp shouldn't respond to these claims.
Click to expand...

He has already responded. He has distanced himself from these people as you folks said he should and has even stated he does not want their money. There really is not anymore he should bother with. You folks are going to continue your dishonest attacks regardless.

There really is no more sincerity here than the attacks from the left on Bush and Iraq. It's about politics only. I am done responding to this nonsense.
 
LadyT said:
I understood your reference completely. Aparently you didn't understand mine.
Click to expand...

So you are arguin that voting against a sense of the senate resolution concerning Parks establishes that he is a racist? You show how dishonest and uncritical you are in these smear. Paul votes against all of these resolutions, it has nothing to do with Parks personally.

LadyT said:
Please post specifically where I said he wasn't responding to the aforementioned. If that is what I said I'd like to have the chance to retract or clarify. If I didn't say anything of the sort and you're pulling out of your ass, I will call you on it.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

Done
 
RStringfield said:
Giving the money back is not relevant to your claim. You said...



He has already responded. He has distanced himself from these people as you folks said he should and has even stated he does not want their money. There really is not anymore he should bother with. You folks are going to continue your dishonest attacks regardless.

There really is no more sincerity here than the attacks from the left on Bush and Iraq. It's about politics only. I am done responding to this nonsense.
Click to expand...

You miss read that COMPLETELY!

I was referring to you when I said, "That's fine tool. Continue rationalizing that keepign the money was a good idea and that RP's camp shouldn't respond to these claims."

YOU WERE THE ONE saying that it was a great idea to keep the $$ and that they shouldn't respond to what you consider to be lies and guess what?! I agree with you 110%. I think RP should just sit back and take it. I'm sure in the long run it will be for the best.
 
RStringfield said:
So you are arguin that voting against a sense of the senate resolution concerning Parks establishes that he is a racist? You show how dishonest and uncritical you are in these smear. Paul votes against all of these resolutions, it has nothing to do with Parks personally.



Done
Click to expand...

In and of itself no. If you take one or two of the incidents that lead me to believe he's a racist on their own, I think a reasonable debate to his inherent racism can be had. When you add them all together, that equals one big fat white nationalist sympathesizer.
 
LadyT said:
You miss read that COMPLETELY!

I was referring to you when I said, "That's fine tool. Continue rationalizing that keepign the money was a good idea and that RP's camp shouldn't respond to these claims."

YOU WERE THE ONE saying that it was a great idea to keep the $$ and that they shouldn't respond to what you consider to be lies and guess what?! I agree with you 110%. I think RP should just sit back and take it. I'm sure in the long run it will be for the best.
Click to expand...

I said they should ignore those attempting to smear. They should pay no attention to the dishonest demands to return the money.

In and of itself no. If you take one or two of the incidents that lead me to believe he's a racist on their own, I think a reasonable debate to his inherent racism can be had. When you add them all together, that equals one big fat white nationalist sympathesizer.
Click to expand...

It's of no relevance to anything. He did not vote against Parks. He voted against these resolutions.
 
lolcatsdotcombtl138k9j39veehb.jpg
 
RStringfield said:
I said they should ignore those attempting to smear. They should pay no attention to the dishonest demands to return the money.
Click to expand...

And I said, I agree with you. Word dicing doesn't make your point valid. Bottom-line you misread what I wrote and at the end of the day: hey no biggie. He should ignore us. He should pay no attention to the demands and keep on doing what he's doing. Its a great step in the right direction. We agree. You can drop the obsession with this point now.


It's of no relevance to anything. He did not vote against Parks. He voted against these resolutions.
Click to expand...

Uh, String, The man states openly that the Civil Rights act was wrong for America. He wrote blatently racist newsletters, refused to give Parks a congressional medal of honor, is seen taking photo ops with neo-nazi's or whatever brand of supremacists he comes from, has no problem taking their money and has according to one of them has met with them on several occassions. Not to mention the fact that he voted against emergency aid for Katrina victims who were overwhelmingly poor and black.
Do you Ronbots have to work at being this obtuse or does it come naturally?
 
LadyT said:
And I said, I agree with you. Word dicing doesn't make your point valid. Bottom-line you misread what I wrote and at the end of the day: hey no biggie. He should ignore us. He should pay no attention to the demands and keep on doing what he's doing. Its a great step in the right direction. We agree. You can drop the obsession with this point now.




Uh, String, The man states openly that the Civil Rights act was wrong for America. He wrote blatently racist newsletters, refused to give Parks a congressional medal of honor, is seen taking photo ops with neo-nazi's or whatever brand of supremacists he comes from, has no problem taking their money and has according to one of them has met with them on several occassions. Not to mention the fact that he voted against emergency aid for Katrina victims who were overwhelmingly poor and black.
Do you Ronbots have to work at being this obtuse or does it come naturally?
Click to expand...

Ron Paul '08!
 
All right Ronbots, I gotta get going and start my weekend. I'm already two drinks behind no thanks you to!

ciao for now
 
LadyT said:
And I said, I agree with you. Word dicing doesn't make your point valid. Bottom-line you misread what I wrote and at the end of the day: hey no biggie. He should ignore us. He should pay no attention to the demands and keep on doing what he's doing. Its a great step in the right direction. We agree. You can drop the obsession with this point now.




Uh, String, The man states openly that the Civil Rights act was wrong for America. He wrote blatently racist newsletters, refused to give Parks a congressional medal of honor, is seen taking photo ops with neo-nazi's or whatever brand of supremacists he comes from, has no problem taking their money and has according to one of them has met with them on several occassions. Not to mention the fact that he voted against emergency aid for Katrina victims who were overwhelmingly poor and black.
Do you Ronbots have to work at being this obtuse or does it come naturally?
Click to expand...


This thread makes me want to cry. :(
 
LadyT said:
And I said, I agree with you. Word dicing doesn't make your point valid. Bottom-line you misread what I wrote and at the end of the day: hey no biggie. He should ignore us. He should pay no attention to the demands and keep on doing what he's doing. Its a great step in the right direction. We agree. You can drop the obsession with this point now.




Uh, String, The man states openly that the Civil Rights act was wrong for America. He wrote blatently racist newsletters, refused to give Parks a congressional medal of honor, is seen taking photo ops with neo-nazi's or whatever brand of supremacists he comes from, has no problem taking their money and has according to one of them has met with them on several occassions. Not to mention the fact that he voted against emergency aid for Katrina victims who were overwhelmingly poor and black.
Do you Ronbots have to work at being this obtuse or does it come naturally?
Click to expand...


Not that I think all liberials are liers---but do you have any reliable references supporting those statements? If so, I would like to see them.
 
LadyT said:
And I said, I agree with you. Word dicing doesn't make your point valid. Bottom-line you misread what I wrote and at the end of the day: hey no biggie. He should ignore us. He should pay no attention to the demands and keep on doing what he's doing. Its a great step in the right direction. We agree. You can drop the obsession with this point now.




Uh, String, The man states openly that the Civil Rights act was wrong for America. He wrote blatently racist newsletters, refused to give Parks a congressional medal of honor, is seen taking photo ops with neo-nazi's or whatever brand of supremacists he comes from, has no problem taking their money and has according to one of them has met with them on several occassions. Not to mention the fact that he voted against emergency aid for Katrina victims who were overwhelmingly poor and black.
Do you Ronbots have to work at being this obtuse or does it come naturally?
Click to expand...

ALL LIES!!!

PAUL - '08!!!
 
I've just noticed that this is another thread about Ron Paul, thus adding to his massive victory as predicted by thread count. There couldn't possibly be more threads about Ron Paul unless this was solely a libertarian site, then it would be close...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top