Top Democratic contenders have no chief executive experience among them

Southern Man said:
Point taken!
Click to expand...

yep---he is right. The best qualification is how much welfare they offer the people out of working peoples pocket books. Why do you think people on welfare (the more the merrier for libs) are almost always liberial? But never pay a dime.

When I ask these liberials what they do for work--they usually become silent--or tell me it is none of my business.

My money says---they don't actually earn theirs.
 
Southern Man said:
It appears that it served him well, as he has served us so well.

Don't let your hatred of the man cloud your judgement of him, or these candidates.
Click to expand...

MWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA You're Funny! LOL I mean...Shrub's record stands for it'self, Glaring incompetance, bitter partisanship, strategic ineptitude, staggering ignorance, corruption....hell of a legacy he has there.

And don't accuse me of hating him. I'm a former Republican who voted for his Dad.

My concern with Bush, was that because he was an aristocrat and never had to actually complete in the real world, like his father did, that the job of President would be beyond him. He's exceeded my worst fears.
 
Southern Man said:
No I wouldn't, but that's not the point of the OP. These Democrats are arguing that they are more qualified than the other, yet none of them has any qualifications.
Click to expand...

and BUSH WAS? ROTFLMAO MWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA. GOD DAMN YOU ARE FUNNY!

Why there only two things George W. Bush and I share in common. We both have Masters degrees and we're both dangerously underqualified to be President! LOL
 
Beefy said:
I don't think so. He's not as adversarial. He's just as insane, but not as pissed. Dig?
Click to expand...

Sounds about right, but could he be dixie after 6 months of therapy and some good drugs in his hide ?

or is it just a common southern type ?
 
SM, Dixie was a former poster here who used to argue with us about the existence of 1/3. He believed that because you couldn't express it decimally that it didn't, in reality, exist.
 
Southern Man said:
By David Broder
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_7989420

Why should that stop the Democrats from claiming that they have any experience at all?
Click to expand...

It's not like we need a commander and chief on day one...


Somalia
BlackHawkDown3.jpg


The first World Trade Center attack...
WTC_1993_ATF.jpg


Khobar Towers...
3.khobar.towers.day.wide.2.jpg


The USS Cole...
426992470_6d79cbfca0.jpg


And of course...
9-11-n.jpg
 
Damocles said:
SM, Dixie was a former poster here who used to argue with us about the existence of 1/3. He believed that because you couldn't express it decimally that it didn't, in reality, exist.
Click to expand...

What relevance does a decimal number have on existence?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top