TRAVIS: When the Dems lose a Kennedy, they've lost the plot

PostmodernProphet said:
stop being stupid.....nobody stole any SC seats.
Click to expand...

Ummm, there was NO Constitution justification for REFUSING A SITTING PRESIDENT HIS OR HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SELECT A SCOTUS JUSTICE. But your guy and Mitch McConnell did EXACTLY THAT.

If you hate the Constitution, vote to change it. Or do what you are going to do and vote for Trump and he'll see to it that you don't have to vote ever again (he literally said that to you religious nutters recently)

PostmodernProphet said:
.....you seem to think you were entitled to something you didn't have the votes to make happen...
Click to expand...

It wasn't a matter of votes. Your guys refused to let a sitting President exercise his Constitutional right and duty.

That's on you.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Harris proves a point that I've been making for a very long time.
The primary system DOES NOT produce the best nominee.

The Party leaders do.
Those who are regularly active in a political party's affairs are the ones who should be choosing
the party's candidates for political office
in as much as they're the ones who know what the fuck they're doing.

Ms. Harris, not chosen through primaries, is an excellent example.
She's an exemplary candidate who didn't do well in the primary process
but who is about to be elected President of the United States of America.
Click to expand...
That's why the MAGATs are in a froth to discredit her years of education, experience, public service, leadership. Ditto for her running mate. They've got nothing to compare to, and they know it. They also know the American people are hungry for a change from ancient rage and vengeance, disunity, hate, grievance, and despair -- what #TRE45ON is selling.
 
Obtenebrator said:
Might want to read the news.

apnews.com

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M

A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House. The verdict was announced in a federal courtroom in New York City on...
apnews.com apnews.com
Click to expand...
I can read the news.....I can also tell the difference between a "conviction" and a civil judgment.......get back to us when YOU can........
 
This one praised quote from the article shows the underlying hilarity of this thread:

"Kennedy's embrace of Trump, which he compared to Abraham Lincoln's team of rivals in his address..."
 
Obtenebrator said:
Ya see....we all know you are going to respond like that to that particular comment. But if you think for one minute we didn't see with our own eye what we saw then you are sorely mistaken.
Click to expand...
whether you "saw" it with the eyes on your forehead or the one up your ass doesn't change the fact that you're lying when you say you saw Trump "fomenting" an attack on the US government......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
whether you "saw" it with the eyes on your forehead or the one up your ass doesn't change the fact that you're lying when you say you saw Trump "fomenting" an attack on the US government......
Click to expand...

I get it. You want to vote for a felon and you can't allow anything through.

Good for you!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top