Voting machines recording Republican when Dem is selected

Desh said:
I think you mean ACORN and no it has never been about vote fraud or purging.
Click to expand...

yeah it's called a typo. something that happens when, though you know how to type a word/phrase, your finger jumbles up keys.

a much better excuse than the one involving you having holes in your brain and being UNABLE to spell words that a third grader could.
 
KingCondanomation said:
I WAS talking about (more Liberal) cities versus (more Conservative) rural areas. You are the one who mistook it for talking about comparing more macro fuzzy data like states.

Rural areas have far more gun owners, more Conservative values, respect for the law and more businesses and home/property owners. Cities that fit more in that mold like Phoenix, Salt Lake City, tend to have lower crime than Liberal cities like Detroit, Chicago, DC, etc...
Click to expand...

There are about two conservative cities in the nation. And NO conservative cities nearly the size of Detroit or Chicago. It's not enough to establish a trend.

It's just bad policy to compare rural areas to urban areas. Vermont elects a fucking socialist to the senate. Liberalism. It works. Conservatism. It's a catastrophe waiting to happen.
 
Last edited:
Grind said:
yeah it's called a typo. something that happens when, though you know how to type a word/phrase, your finger jumbles up keys.

a much better excuse than the one involving you having holes in your brain and being UNABLE to spell words that a third grader could.
Click to expand...

Grinage.

No false vote has ever been attributed to one of these fired ACORN workers voters regs.

Why would you worry about an election when its not effected by this crap?
 
Desh said:
Im so glad those dead people cant vote now.

Are you sure they are dead?
Click to expand...
Don't be obtuse. I posted earlier that the courts found him to be in the right. Why don't you ask the judge instead of trying to scare more people into believing half-truths and total rubbish?
 
Damocles said:
uscit, what part of paper tracking makes that difficult to play?
Click to expand...

Paper tracking unless viewed by the voter is useless. You can display
Dem on the screen and punch Rep on the paper.
I prefer mechanical vs programmable with a paper trail.
All places do not have a paper trial.
 
Damocles said:
Don't be obtuse. I posted earlier that the courts found him to be in the right. Why don't you ask the judge instead of trying to scare more people into believing half-truths and total rubbish?
Click to expand...


Can you throw me the link to the article so I can be updated on his innocence?
 
Desh said:
Grinage.

No false vote has ever been attributed to one of these fired ACORN workers voters regs.

Why would you worry about an election when its not effected by this crap?
Click to expand...
Again, if investigators actually could not collect evidence then said that no evidence was found would that mean no crime was ever committed? When one of the accepted forms of "identification" is as easy to fake as a 'copy of a utility bill'... Please. I'm amazed they find as many as they do. Houses in the middle of rivers, etc...
 
Desh said:
Can you throw me the link to the article so I can be updated on his innocence?
Click to expand...
http://www.denverpost.com/previous2/home/ci_10682767

Here's one about it.

First it speaks to your totally fabricated number of 1 in 5, totally fabricated unless you think some 2,454 people are 1 in 5 voters in this state. (I'll give you hint, that isn't even enough to make it 1 in 5 in my own county which isn't very large in population...)

However, Coffman said his office will ask Attorney General John Suthers, also a Republican, if it was legal for 2,454 duplicate voter registrations to have been removed from the rolls within the 90-day window.

Coffman's office made clear that those 2,454 voters had not been removed from the rolls, just their duplicate registrations.
Click to expand...

I said "courts" I was wrong. It was determined that since they had not been removed, only the duplicated registrations were deleted so they would be able to vote, that they had not violated the law. It never made it to the courts.

However, the one mistake he does admit to is some 4000 people were given some bad information about when registrations were due.


The article simply made crap up. The numbers aren't even halfway near what they pretended. It was written to scare you, and it appears that it did.
 
In a statement responding to questions from The Denver Post, Catherine Mathis, a spokeswoman for The New York Times, said the article used voter registration data provided by 15 states and was analyzed by consultants.

"We analyzed two snapshots in time of that data, most often with the starting snapshot being on or after Aug. 1 and the closing snapshot being a month or so later," Mathis said in the statement.

"This time frame enabled us to see any changes to the rolls within the 90-day window, when most purges are forbidden by federal law.

"With regard to Colorado, the story also focused on potentially illegal purges. The same overall methodology was used to calculate the purge estimates. The time period for the data we assessed was July 21 and the closing date was Sept. 16. The numbers found were far larger than could be accounted for by deaths or people moving out of state."

Thanks Damo.


I will try and find something about the reply to these discrepancies
 
http://www.kansascity.com/449/story/854311.html

It seems there is still some problems in Colorado


Election officials telling college students they can't vote
Greg Gordon
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — Colorado Democrats accused a Republican county clerk Wednesday of falsely informing Colorado College that students from outside the state could not register to vote if their parents claimed them as a dependent on their tax returns.

At a news conference in Colorado Springs, Democrats also criticized Robert Balink, the El Paso County clerk and recorder, who was a delegate to the Republican National Convention, for taking other steps they said would dampen voting by college students, who are expected to heavily favor Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

"When election officials spread false information about who is eligible to vote and remove, not add, polling places, we need to be concerned that eligible voters will be denied their right to vote," said Pat Waak, chairwoman of the Colorado Democratic Party.

Balink issued a statement saying his office had misinterpreted state law and “mistakenly published information that was incorrect.”
 
It is just so VERY sad to me how many Americans are willing to put party over country.

Its heartbreaking
 
Damocles said:
Hence the testing and certification process.

The assumption that they can magically change things without getting past the seals is preposterous. Also the capacity for all 10 Judges there to pass out while they started opening it to get at the hardware they'd have to swap out is very limited.

People are there from both parties during the entire process. It gets silly constantly speaking of good ways to keep the vote without having to resort to questionable hand counting with psychic determination.
Click to expand...
Not only this but if you use pen and paper and optical scanner there is a paper back up so if there are questions you can hand count the vote.
 
Desh said:
If the supreme court allows a recount.
Click to expand...
Desh in fairness to the US Supreme Court Gore did not ask for a statewide recount. ONLY a recount of certain places and that is where the effort failed. He should have demanded a statewide recount but I think they were afraid that more bush votes would be found in the Redneck Riviera
 
The supreme court didn't say anything about that in their ruling, you hack. They chose to stop the recount in progress because the nation needed to move on and have a president. It was total bullshit.
 
ib1yysguy said:
The supreme court didn't say anything about that in their ruling, you hack. They chose to stop the recount in progress because the nation needed to move on and have a president. It was total bullshit.
Click to expand...
You obviously have never read the opinion. You can find it here at http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html where they talk at length about equal protection throughout the state. Good luck on the advanced reading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top