I think he won re-election because Kerry was seen to suck even worse at the Iraq war thing.She claims Republicans don't vote on 'facts'. Supposedly this poll she attached is the reason W won re-election in '04.
I think he won re-election because Kerry was seen to suck even worse at the Iraq war thing.She claims Republicans don't vote on 'facts'. Supposedly this poll she attached is the reason W won re-election in '04.
That is not evidence of a current statistic on how many believe Saddam was involved in 9/11 currently. A poll from September 2003 certainly is not evidence of current understanding.
For some reason I crossed it with the uscit claim that 30% still believe that Saddam was the cause of 9/11.Um, I asked her for the old data. Do try to read and comprehend old man.
now you believe our Bush led government?
HUH ?? I belive nothing from our Bush led government and not much from a Dem led government.
I did not believe the mushroom clouds, WMD's etc from Bush.
But official studies from the bush led government said Sadam had nothing to do with 911. I am referring to those who who selectively believe from a bush led govt and cannot admit they were wrong.
For some reason I crossed it with the uscit claim that 30% still believe that Saddam was the cause of 9/11.
you said our government said there was no relation between Saddam and Al-Queda or 9/11. You were taking the word of the Bush Administration that there were no connections.
LOL read it again.
You know it was all Clintons fault
Also from me:
I am referring to those who who selectively believe from a bush led govt and cannot admit they were wrong.
Would it not also be selectively believing to believe the government because they said there was no connection?
I think he won re-election because Kerry was seen to suck even worse at the Iraq war thing.