Dolfuss formed the Christian Socialist government in 1932. Franco disappointed the NAZIs by maintaining traditional socialism which he explained as wanting to aid Spain's poverty-stricken. Mussolini was a huge fan of Karl Marx and was a traditional socialist, becoming editor of the Italian Socialist Party's official newspaper/newsletter ... but while collaborating with Gentile became convinced of Gentile's approach and adopted the word "fascism" to denote the distinction.
Dollfuß formed the "Christian Social" government. Not Socialist, but Social. I hope this was an honest mistake on your part, but I'm guessing it wasn't.
No, Franco never declared himself or Spain to be Socialist. I'm sure you can find some regulations to serve as "evidence" that Francoist Spain was Socialist, though.
Mussolini used to be Socialist, but later denounced Socialism and became a Fascist. Fascist Italy was never declared a Socialist state and the economy was Capitalist.
Giovanni Gentile established fascism as a refinement of socialism. The only difference is in the appeal, or the "sales pitch" if you will. We have to use the word "fascism" because the word "Gentilism" is already taken by something else. Fascism is Gentile's brand of socialism, and it was amazingly popular because there was never any requirement for pretense of eventually stepping down. Gentile's socialism has the people rallying around a leader in a "cult of personality" as a father figure who unites them all as one family. We're still talking about socialism, just Gentile's socialism that we call "fascism."
After the Right failed to keep Democracy out of France, they decided they could use Capitalism to maintain a strict hierarchy. That's basically what Gentile did with Socialism. The same way earlier Authoritarians created a right-wing version of Capitalism, Gentile created a right-wing version of Socialism. Later on, other Authoritarians created forms of Fascism that were more Capitalist in nature, such as Nazism, but the basic tenets were the same. A strict hierarchy with minimal civil rights. And it's the same kind of right-wing politics we're now having in America, Russia, Hungary, the Philippines, and so on.
You continue to REFUSE to define them. You are throwing around empty buzzwords and you become totally dishonest when I simply ask you to define what you mean.
Nice try, but I defined the Alt-Right in my last post. I said "The Alt-Right is a modern form of Fascism involving White Nationalism."
What defines a white nationalist if not a Caucasian patriot? I'm all ears. The floor is yours.
How do you refer to a "white" person who is nationalistic? I'm all ears. The floor is yours.
What defines someone who is "Alt-Right" in a substantive way that amounts to more than merely a slur? I'm all ears. The floor is yours.
A White Nationalist in someone who wants an ethnostate for white people. White Nationalists in America, such as Richard Spencer, David Duke, Jared Taylor, and such want to ban non-white immigration to America. I gave you a link to the Wikipedia article, but you pretended Wikipedia is controlled by Marxists because you want to deny that White Nationalism exists.
You mean Civic Nationalist as opposed to Ethnic Nationalist? I guess I'd use the word "patriot."
As I said, the Alt-Right is a new movement that combines Fascism and White Nationalism. Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch, but their own admission and politics, are part of the Alt-Right.
