Wheels falling off
- Thread starter Lionfish
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
^^^
Legion's winziger schwanz proves "innocent until proven guilty" only applies to white conservatives.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Richard Clower died before 9/11, dumbass. His wife, Frances Fox, is 91, and last known for protesting GW's invasion of Iraq.
Is 20 year old material about dead or very old people all you have to offer, Herr Winziger Schwanz?
Mr. Tiny Penis, I see this flew right over your head. You alt leftie anti American cucks should know all about those two.
What is the Cloward–Piven strategy?
The Cloward–Piven strategy was developed in 1966 by Americans Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven - both sociologists and political activists. The Cloward–Piven strategy focused on overloading the United States public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis, which would ultimately lead to replacing the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".
An ancillary consequence of the strategy includes shoring up of the Democratic Party, which at the time was splintered by pluralistic interests. Another side effect would be relieving local and state governments of public welfare burdens, since the burden would be shifted to the federal government - in other words, in a manifestation of socialism. Taxpayers, of course, would cover the cost in either case.
Cloward and Piven focused primarily on redistribution of income, stating that full enrollment in welfare programs:
"would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments" that would: "...deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas."...
The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Agreed you are a dumbass, Herr Winziger Schwanz.
Have you considered seeing a doctor about your anxiety issues?
If not, Fox News says there's plenty of fentanyl all over the streets. Take as many of those until your fears and anxieties go away.
Mr. Tiny Penis, I see my response educated you as well as touched a nerve,Agreed you are a dumbass, Herr Winziger Schwanz.
Have you considered seeing a doctor about your anxiety issues?
If not, Fox News says there's plenty of fentanyl all over the streets. Take as many of those until your fears and anxieties go away.
once again,
What is the Cloward–Piven strategy?
The Cloward–Piven strategy was developed in 1966 by Americans Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven - both sociologists and political activists. The Cloward–Piven strategy focused on overloading the United States public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis, which would ultimately lead to replacing the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".
An ancillary consequence of the strategy includes shoring up of the Democratic Party, which at the time was splintered by pluralistic interests. Another side effect would be relieving local and state governments of public welfare burdens, since the burden would be shifted to the federal government - in other words, in a manifestation of socialism. Taxpayers, of course, would cover the cost in either case.
Cloward and Piven focused primarily on redistribution of income, stating that full enrollment in welfare programs:
"would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments" that would: "...deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas."...
The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Sorry, Herr Winziger Schwanz, but I'm married. Matt and a few others Trumpers swing that way. Go ask them.