USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Just because they wouldn't let you in, doesn't mean you get to "speculate" what they may or may not do.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
When Will The Day Be?
- Thread starter Howey
- Start date
Just because they wouldn't let you in, doesn't mean you get to "speculate" what they may or may not do.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
then you don't really know much at all.I've been to gun ranges before. I'll admit it was several years ago. I don't remember the specifics, but I doubt any gun range would allow people to come in unsupervised to shoot guns. At the minimum, I would expect the range to furnish someone to teach the novice before they let them go willy nilly with a gun.
then you don't really know much at all.
Do ranges allow people in unsupervised and untrained to shoot guns?
That should be an easy question to answer. Why won't you?
And why won't you answer my second question?
Hmm...I wonder how many suicides have occurred in gun ranges?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I've walked in to half a dozen ranges. i've been ASKED if I need any assistance, but never been asked to show any proof that I don't need any training.Do ranges allow people in unsupervised and untrained to shoot guns?
That should be an easy question to answer. Why won't you?
because your suicide question is irrelevant. unless you forgot to add something that I should be made aware of.And why won't you answer my second question?
I've walked in to half a dozen ranges. i've been ASKED if I need any assistance, but never been asked to show any proof that I don't need any training.
because your suicide question is irrelevant. unless you forgot to add something that I should be made aware of.
So one does not have to provide proof of training before entering a range. Thanks for agreeing with me.
And why is the second question irrelevant?
The Communist Chinese government, via its state-run media front Xinhua, has called for Americans to be disarmed, arguing that the Sandy Hook school massacre demands “no delay for U.S. gun control.”
Xinhua is virtually the press agency for the Communist Chinese government. The organization, “is subordinate to the State Council and reports to the Communist Party of China’s Propaganda and Public Information Departments.”
http://www.infowars.com/communist-chinese-government-calls-for-americans-to-be-disarmed/
Well....at lease the Democrats of the US have some international support from their friends and allies overseas.....
No surprise here.....
Xinhua is virtually the press agency for the Communist Chinese government. The organization, “is subordinate to the State Council and reports to the Communist Party of China’s Propaganda and Public Information Departments.”
http://www.infowars.com/communist-chinese-government-calls-for-americans-to-be-disarmed/
Well....at lease the Democrats of the US have some international support from their friends and allies overseas.....
No surprise here.....
The Communist Chinese government, via its state-run media front Xinhua, has called for Americans to be disarmed, arguing that the Sandy Hook school massacre demands “no delay for U.S. gun control.”
Xinhua is virtually the press agency for the Communist Chinese government. The organization, “is subordinate to the State Council and reports to the Communist Party of China’s Propaganda and Public Information Departments.”
http://www.infowars.com/communist-chinese-government-calls-for-americans-to-be-disarmed/
Well....at lease the Democrats of the US have some international support from their friends and allies overseas.....
No surprise here.....
Ya know...when I see shit like this, then see it comes from Infowars, and is all over every crazy conspiracy blog out there and highlighted by none other than BREITBART, it's pretty easy to realize the story isn't really what's being told.
Here's the story from China:
Twenty-eight innocent people, including 20 primary students, have been slaughtered in a mass shooting at an elementary school in the U.S. state of Connecticut. Their blood and tears demand no delay for the U.S. gun control.
The massacre has triggered a new debate on gun control in the United States. However, this time, the public feels somewhat tired and helpless.
The past six months have seen enough shooting rampages in the United States. Just three days ago, three people were shot dead at a shopping mall in Oregon. Two weeks ago, a football player shot his girlfriend dead and then committed suicide. Five months ago, 12 people were killed and 58 wounded in a shooting spree at a midnight screening of a Batman film in Colorado.
However, these are only part of the gun violence which has drawn the whole country's attention. Every time a tragedy occurs, there are renewed appeals for gun regulation. However, the calls disappointingly always fail.
Regulation of private gun ownership has been a sensitive issue in the U.S. for a long time. Americans own 280 million guns, with 34 percent of U.S. families possessing the deadly weapon. Gun lobbies, such as the National Rifle Association (NRA), are very influencial.
Centering on issues such as whether citizens can bear arms, and whether the government has the right to ban guns, the opposing camps have debated hotly for years.
Electoral politics is another important reason for the failure of gun control efforts. The Democratic Party has historically paid a price for its gun control efforts.
The Clinton government launched a series of gun control policies at the end of last century. And the Democrats lost the Congressional election in 1994 and the presidential election in 2000, with the shadow of the NRA present in both defeats.
The terrifying mass shooting in Colorado happened in an election year. As a result, neither of the Democratic nor the Republican party were willing to step up gun control, due to possible political ramifications.
For all that, the latest heartbreaking deaths of the 20 schoolchildren aged five to 10 have made the crime especially unbearable. Many people can't help but turn to the dim hope once again: the gunman's cruelty and evil may provide a strong momentum and broader public support for the restart of gun control efforts. Moreover, with no re-election pressure, President Obama is currently in the best position to promote it.
Obama said of the latest tragedy the country had "been through this too many times," and it was time to put aside political differences and "take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this."
Some people have noticed Obama's tougher tone this time, compared to the Colorado shooting, when he called for "prayer and reflection."
Action speaks louder than words. If Obama wants to take practical measures to control guns, he has to make preparation for a protracted war and considerable political cost.
Hardly a call to rip the guns out of the hands of all Americans, isn't it?
Look, dumbfuck. When a story, as I noted, is found everywhere but legitimate sources, it's bound to not be true.
Ya know...when I see shit like this, then see it comes from Infowars, and is all over every crazy conspiracy blog out there and highlighted by none other than BREITBART, it's pretty easy to realize the story isn't really what's being told.
Here's the story from China:
Hardly a call to rip the guns out of the hands of all Americans, isn't it?
Look, dumbfuck. When a story, as I noted, is found everywhere but legitimate sources, it's bound to not be true.
Btw...we liberals have a name for this, the persistent need for right wing websites to cite themselves or other spurious blogs without actually citing the real source.
It's called The Circle Jerk Of Attribution (c)
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Is there ever a day to discuss gun violence?