Why haven’t Kyle Rittenhouse’ Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

[ExpressLane]

This Trumptard had just killed a person in cold blood, just minutes before some protestors tried to disarm him- just minutes before someone started filming him with a cellphone and captured his takedown and his ultimate murdering and attempting murder of two more protestors.

So there is no reason to arrest his attackers- and besides one was severly shot in the head and is now on life support, and the other man that tried to disarm him
was shot and killed by the TRUMPTARDED GUN-TOTING FOOL!

So who now are you suggesting they arrest? The one in intensive care- or the dead one?

YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT!

He only shot people who were attacking him.

 

[zymurgy]

"we have," well if the "we" there is "patriots rising," next

we is the public at large - you shit stain dick hole

https://www.youtube.com/embed/kd8i8HV6rfM

 

[Nordberg]

The AR did not come from out of Wisconsin.

I read his mother drove him there with it. It does not matter, He got one and went hunting. He was underage for a gun. Him having it was illegal, but that pales to his murders.

 

[Nordberg]

How about those who stole his bullets. Their estates should pay for those.

 

[Minister of Truth]

How about those who stole his bullets. Their estates should pay for those.

He can get his money by filing slander/libel suits against the fake news.

 

[Darth Omar]

How do you arrest dead people?

Obviously, you can’t, but if Huber was in the process of committing a crime against the shooter that could bolster a self defense plea.

Yet another, in a long summer of counting jury verdicts before they hatch.

 

[Terri4Trump]

Obviously, you can’t, but if Huber was in the process of committing a crime against the shooter that could bolster a self defense plea.

Yet another, in a long summer of counting jury verdicts before they hatch.

Did the pedophile get served? I thought I read that he got served.

 

[Darth Omar]

Did the pedophile get served? I thought I read that he got served.

Honestly, I haven’t been following it all that close lol.

 

[AProudLefty]

Obviously, you can’t, but if Huber was in the process of committing a crime against the shooter that could bolster a self defense plea.

Yet another, in a long summer of counting jury verdicts before they hatch.

What was the reason for going after him?

 

[Althea]

We all know why. Liberals are always allowed to break any law they wish. That's why we have hundreds of sanctuary cities in america.

Ummm...NO.

What these who you refer to as 'breaking the law' were actually doing, was executing a perfectly acceptable and perfectly legal act of self defense.

You cannot claim self defense after instigating an incident. Even SYG is clear about that. This was a group of ill prepared protesters trying to neutralize a murderer. If the fool with the skateboard had assistance from one or two of the people who were right there, nobody else would have been shot.

If you don't know how to fight, best to just let the kid get away. Let the cops handle it.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Imagine starting this thread. Holy shit you are one fucking disgusting shithead.

HAHAHA The board notes all you have is personal attack. The videos are so conclusive even you can see kyle was attacked and the surviving attackers should be charged.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

This Trumptard had just killed a person in cold blood, just minutes before some protestors tried to disarm him- !

HAHAHAHA. Did you really say that?. His attackers wanted to KILL HIM and even you can see that.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Ummm...NO.

What these who you refer to as 'breaking the law' were actually doing, was executing a perfectly acceptable and perfectly legal act of self defense.

Kyle was not threatening anyone when the mob attacked him. He was running away!!!

 

[Althea]

Kyle was not threatening anyone when the mob attacked him. He was running away!!!

Correct. I think the term you are looking for is 'fleeing a murder scene'.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

He only shot people who were attacking him.

No, all you saw was his victim no. 2 & 3 on video.

Before that video we all saw, he had just shot and killed a man in cold blood at random walking down the street.

There were witnesses, and they were the ones that tried to disarm the killer and got themselves shot as well.

The two people that he shot on the video are actually heroes. They RISKED THEIR OWN LIVES TO TRY AND SAVE OTHERS!

And besides, it is against the law to shoot people period! You can't just shoot people for trying to disarm a killer of his weapon after he just shot and killed an innocent unarmed person.

 

[Jerome]

Well, if his attackers are not charged, I have no doubt that will become an issue during Rittenhouse's trial and likely a big problem for the prosecution to convince a jury Rittenhouse is guilty. It's going to look like the prosecutor was playing favorites and that won't sit well with most folks.

Any kids in a school who try to take down a shooter should also be charged, according to your retard logic.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Any kids in a school who try to take down a shooter should also be charged, according to your retard logic.

By what twisted bit of insanity did you reach that conclusion? Or, is it just a gratuitous ad hominem because you can't make an articulate response? Just curious...

After all, Rittenhouse's attackers attacked him before he shot them or even fired a shot. So your example doesn't hold water.

 

[Irish]

We all know why. Liberals are always allowed to break any law they wish. That's why we have hundreds of sanctuary cities in america.

Yup. Leftist mobs are allowed to do what they want. People like Kamala Harris will just release them from jail.

 

[Nordberg]

They were trying to stop him from murdering more people. The cops know that . You guys love a person shooting people you do not like.

 

[Althea]

By what twisted bit of insanity did you reach that conclusion? Or, is it just a gratuitous ad hominem because you can't make an articulate response? Just curious...

After all, Rittenhouse's attackers attacked him before he shot them or even fired a shot. So your example doesn't hold water.

Wrong. He just murdered someone.