Why I'm a Liberal

Classic Liberal said:
You are not a “liberal” in any American traditional sense of constitutional liberalism. What you actually are is a leftist socialist which is as moon’s distance from traditional classical American constitutional liberalism.
Click to expand...

Ah, so you get to decide what "liberal" means? Sorry asshole, you represent <2% of voting Americans. The libertarian joke coke candidate barely won a million votes. You don't get to decide anything.

The countries which you present as some kind of evidence of successful socialism, are all minute little establishments with populations fractional to that of the United States and hardly more, if at all more than most American individual States. They have no national defense to speak of, No Military Industrial Complex like America. No military bases and troops in over 120 other nations. They have no American Drug War Culture or Urban Gang-Bangers nor the high degree of socialist vote purchases made on a racist basis by racist American Democrats.

You see, socialism may well be fine and dandy if it can be controlled, i. e. a “social safety net.” Our founding fathers understood that a huge central government composed of several states, unlike the countries you present, instituting a federal social safety net in America, would simply be a cluster fuck of bribery, favoritism and pure uncontrollable fucking stupidity. Thus, they created a Constitutional Republic that gave ”particular” and ”limited” powers to the central government and gave all other powers, whims and follies to the individual States as long as they didn’t violate the National Constitution. Thereby establishing a nation of microcosm laboratories deciding such social establishments for themselves and thereby learning the proper do’s and do-not’s from one another while at the same time incorporating the particular economic availabilities and state’s citizens particular needs and desires and also holding up and holding dear the ability of every citizen to vote with their feet, i. e. if they didn’t like the particular state’s established social system and or the cost thereof, they could simply move to another state whereby they could more likely pursue their happiness.

To acknowledge and accept that pure rationality and genius, you must become a constitutionalist purist patriot and Classic Liberal and put aside the childish things, the racism, slavery and the bankrupting follies of America’s fucking idiot Democrats and Republicans.

“IT’S NOT COMPLICATED!”
Click to expand...

I see. So yet again, the conservative/libertarian excuse for the success of Europe, Australia, et al is that they're smaller than the US. Would you be OK, then, with a State establishing a social safety net similar to that of Denmark's? I have a hunch that you would not.
 
Rune said:
Somehow you will learn that making word definitions exact is not productive. It is arguing semantics, always a distraction and a waste of time.
We value your opinion, not your corrections.
Click to expand...

And somehow, I hope, you'll learn that words have meanings. If you just assign new ones at will, any discussion of political theory becomes impossible to carry out.
 
Rose said:
And somehow, I hope, you'll learn that words have meanings. If you just assign new ones at will, any discussion of political theory becomes impossible to carry out.
Click to expand...
If this was a forum fo PHDs in Poltical Science I would agree
but I would also want to kill everyone on the forum
since the study of political science is truly evil and responsible for most of the misery on earth.
If, on the othet hand I was a member of such I would agree.
Since neither is the case, I disagree androgynous one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top