Judge revokes Zimmerman's bond

we don't know that. you don't have access to all the evidence. if you want to base that on information available to you, that is fine. but let's be clear, we don't know the full story, saying for sure he is guilty or innocent, at this point is premature.

yup I am not making an official ruling, of course I am basing my opinion on available evidence. I'm not a jpp prole with a political agenda that just tries to make a story fit my narrative in spite of the facts because I hate guns. It's not like I have people in the media splicing audio to make someone say things that they weren't. Or looking at video footage and because I can't see blood, discounting all medical reports of multiple head injuries. Or that I continually say zimmerman kept following trayvon while never presenting any evidence for that assertion. I'm not like that
 
yup I am not making an official ruling, of course I am basing my opinion on available evidence. I'm not a jpp prole with a political agenda that just tries to make a story fit my narrative in spite of the facts because I hate guns. It's not like I have people in the media splicing audio to make someone say things that they weren't. Or looking at video footage and because I can't see blood, discounting all medical reports of multiple head injuries. Or that I continually say zimmerman kept following trayvon while never presenting any evidence for that assertion. I'm not like that

YEah, you just overlook the facts, like he lied to a judge...
 
All you righty klansman would lose your shit if the kid was white and the murderer black!

everyone knows whites get to kill blacks more, with a 2:1 ratio. In exchange, blacks are allowed to take over the nba. This was all worked out decades ago
 
What could "I thought he was in his twenties" possibly imply?

i think people have a natural inclination to feeling more sorry for killing children than adults. Although trayvon likely deserved to be shot, you feel sadder because you realize he wasn't a mature adult fully thinking things through.

Or it could have meant that because he thought he was younger, he would have felt he was less of a risk of being a burglar or something, and wouldn't have bothered following him. etc
 
Really, talk about jumping to conclusions.

zimmerman has multiple head injuries. Trayvon, as far as I am aware, has no such injuries. It's very unlikely zimmerman initiated a physical confrontation. The evidence points to trayvon acting criminally, not zimmerman. Following someone is not a crime, and does not give someone license to start beating another up.

I am not saying it's the whole story, but right now, zimmerman looks better than trayvon, based on the evidence.
 
YEah, you just overlook the facts, like he lied to a judge...

again, he might have overlooked. Also, I think everyone would try to get themselves the best deal for bond. I think it's pretty laughable you use wanting to pay less money for something as a mark on someones character.
 
zimmerman has multiple head injuries. Trayvon, as far as I am aware, has no such injuries. It's very unlikely zimmerman initiated a physical confrontation. The evidence points to trayvon acting criminally, not zimmerman. Following someone is not a crime, and does not give someone license to start beating another up.

I am not saying it's the whole story, but right now, zimmerman looks better than trayvon, based on the evidence.

Other than the bullet wound that snuffed him, you mean.
 
yup I am not making an official ruling, of course I am basing my opinion on available evidence. I'm not a jpp prole with a political agenda that just tries to make a story fit my narrative in spite of the facts because I hate guns. It's not like I have people in the media splicing audio to make someone say things that they weren't. Or looking at video footage and because I can't see blood, discounting all medical reports of multiple head injuries. Or that I continually say zimmerman kept following trayvon while never presenting any evidence for that assertion. I'm not like that

No shit, you are taking a break from video games with your skinhead klan friend.
 
Other than the bullet wound that snuffed him, you mean.

it's perfectly legal to shoot someone in self defense.

It is not legal, to physically assault someone for following you.

There is more evidence that trayvon acted criminally, than zimmerman.
 
zimmerman has multiple head injuries. Trayvon, as far as I am aware, has no such injuries. It's very unlikely zimmerman initiated a physical confrontation. The evidence points to trayvon acting criminally, not zimmerman. Following someone is not a crime, and does not give someone license to start beating another up.

I am not saying it's the whole story, but right now, zimmerman looks better than trayvon, based on the evidence.

I have seen many fights started by others and they got their asses handed to them, the degree of injury does not determine who inititated the confrontation. If certain accounts are to be believed, Zimmerman pushed Trayvon and Trayvon then proceeded to defend himself and Zimmerman paniced and pulled out the gun, and then Trayvon was shot. Police did not believe certain aspects of Zimmerman's story, they stated the evidence did not fit, so we will have to wait and see exactly what the evidence is in court.
 
Back
Top