How would be know his age.....?
we don't know that. you don't have access to all the evidence. if you want to base that on information available to you, that is fine. but let's be clear, we don't know the full story, saying for sure he is guilty or innocent, at this point is premature.
All you righty klansman would lose your shit if the kid was white and the murderer black!
What could "I thought he was in his twenties" possibly imply?I mean that could imply ten different things, I don't find it very relevant.
yup I am not making an official ruling, of course I am basing my opinion on available evidence. I'm not a jpp prole with a political agenda that just tries to make a story fit my narrative in spite of the facts because I hate guns. It's not like I have people in the media splicing audio to make someone say things that they weren't. Or looking at video footage and because I can't see blood, discounting all medical reports of multiple head injuries. Or that I continually say zimmerman kept following trayvon while never presenting any evidence for that assertion. I'm not like that
especially considering there is more evidence that trayvon acted criminally, rather than zimmerman.
All you righty klansman would lose your shit if the kid was white and the murderer black!
What could "I thought he was in his twenties" possibly imply?
Really, talk about jumping to conclusions.
YEah, you just overlook the facts, like he lied to a judge...
Why is this a troll only thread you loser!stfu and crawl back under that rock
zimmerman has multiple head injuries. Trayvon, as far as I am aware, has no such injuries. It's very unlikely zimmerman initiated a physical confrontation. The evidence points to trayvon acting criminally, not zimmerman. Following someone is not a crime, and does not give someone license to start beating another up.
I am not saying it's the whole story, but right now, zimmerman looks better than trayvon, based on the evidence.
yup I am not making an official ruling, of course I am basing my opinion on available evidence. I'm not a jpp prole with a political agenda that just tries to make a story fit my narrative in spite of the facts because I hate guns. It's not like I have people in the media splicing audio to make someone say things that they weren't. Or looking at video footage and because I can't see blood, discounting all medical reports of multiple head injuries. Or that I continually say zimmerman kept following trayvon while never presenting any evidence for that assertion. I'm not like that
Other than the bullet wound that snuffed him, you mean.
Your an idiot, let me guess! You skipped college!it's perfectly legal to shoot someone in self defense.
It is not legal, to physically assault someone for following you.
There is more evidence that trayvon acted criminally, than zimmerman.
Your an idiot, let me guess! You skipped college!
zimmerman has multiple head injuries. Trayvon, as far as I am aware, has no such injuries. It's very unlikely zimmerman initiated a physical confrontation. The evidence points to trayvon acting criminally, not zimmerman. Following someone is not a crime, and does not give someone license to start beating another up.
I am not saying it's the whole story, but right now, zimmerman looks better than trayvon, based on the evidence.