The vast majority of gun owners in this country are law-abiding citizens

Of course not. Do you realize how stupid - and desperate - you sound comparing trained law enforcement officers to whackos like James Holmes?

The exact same thing can be said about your comparison of this CO nut to, as you are prone to call them, "gun nuts."
 
yort since you want to go there with me, I'm in my 30s. There is no sound argument you could make where you need AK-147 to defend yourself in public in the United States. Like I said before Stupid Classless people the gun owner and NRA are. I stand by that statement.

tell me something, because this is where i and people like STY part ways.....

where does the second amendment draw the line about "arms"? that is the issue. the issue is not protection. the issue is - right to bear arms.
 
Welcome.



You want to qualify this by numbers? While I agree with you about the unnecessary deaths in two unnecessary wars, this isn't about this and those numbers weren't included.

What number of young deaths per year by guns is acceptable? 500? 5000? 10000? What's the magic number?????

How about NONE!

How about pie in the sky in a nation of 300,000,000+
 
yort i'm glad you said that. Since I have always wanted have nukes. So shouldn't I gave the right to have nukes then? NRA people are so stupid and classless.
 
vallista? what? you can't even say my name right, let alone, make a sentence that makes sense.

please try again. i know you're trying.
 
How many guns did Jesus own?

None that I know of but his disciples carried swords as they traveled with Him. It really doesn't have much bearing on what I am reading here though. I admit I responded in haste and said something I shouldn't have said but like Winterborn indicated either in another thread or in this thread, when something like this happens ... And there is no doubt that it is a tragedy ... You can expect someone to cry for more gun legislation. I have been reading this stuff all day. For someone to equate that nut to all gun owners or to say that gun owners shouldn't be outraged when something like this happens is just dumb.
 
yort, yart, dork or whatever, you've failed to make a sound argument in any of your post today. You think its ok to carry a AK-47 in public because you protection from innocent people watching a movie. Right....................like I said Classless.
 
None that I know of but his disciples carried swords as they traveled with Him. It really doesn't have much bearing on what I am reading here though. I admit I responded in haste and said something I shouldn't have said but like Winterborn indicated either in another thread or in this thread, when something like this happens ... And there is no doubt that it is a tragedy ... You can expect someone to cry for more gun legislation. I have been reading this stuff all day. For someone to equate that nut to all gun owners or to say that gun owners shouldn't be outraged when something like this happens is just dumb.

I don't have a problem with reasonable gun ownership, rifles, hand guns, but assault weapons are purely for killing large number of people in a small amount of time. I see no need for them.

In my perfect world there would be no guns.
 
None that I know of but his disciples carried swords as they traveled with Him. It really doesn't have much bearing on what I am reading here though. I admit I responded in haste and said something I shouldn't have said but like Winterborn indicated either in another thread or in this thread, when something like this happens ... And there is no doubt that it is a tragedy ... You can expect someone to cry for more gun legislation. I have been reading this stuff all day. For someone to equate that nut to all gun owners or to say that gun owners shouldn't be outraged when something like this happens is just dumb.

This latest tragedy doesn't make your case any stronger. Point is this scumbag had access to weapons and gear to carry out mass murder. The gear and weapons this scumbag was carrying go beyond the argument of self defense.
 
yort, yart, dork or whatever, you've failed to make a sound argument in any of your post today. You think its ok to carry a AK-47 in public because you protection from innocent people watching a movie. Right....................like I said Classless.

still can't address my points....and instead only capable of red herrings.

wow...i'm awe of you. a poster who can't address points and only creates red herrings. wow. you rock buddy. you can't even cite where i said an AK was necessary, yet you pretend i did.

hello?
 
still can't address my points....and instead only capable of red herrings.

wow...i'm awe of you. a poster who can't address points and only creates red herrings. wow. you rock buddy. you can't even cite where i said an AK was necessary, yet you pretend i did.

hello?

What fucking point have you made? None.
 
where does the second amendment draw the line about "arms"? that is the issue. the issue is not protection. the issue is - right to bear arms.

you really think that is not making a point?

Second amendment is not problem. government has the right and have curb the second amendment to suit modern times. That is why people can't own weapons of mass destruction.
 
yort since you want to go there with me, I'm in my 30s. There is no sound argument you could make where you need AK-147 to defend yourself in public in the United States. Like I said before Stupid Classless people the gun owner and NRA are. I stand by that statement.

So all gun owners are stupid and classless? That is total ignorance on your part.
 
yort since you want to go there with me, I'm in my 30s. There is no sound argument you could make where you need AK-147 to defend yourself in public in the United States. Like I said before Stupid Classless people the gun owner and NRA are. I stand by that statement.

what did the founders have in mind when they wrote the 2nd Amendment?
 
yort, yart, dork or whatever, you've failed to make a sound argument in any of your post today. You think its ok to carry a AK-47 in public because you protection from innocent people watching a movie. Right....................like I said Classless.

you sound pretty classless to me. jus sayin
 
This latest tragedy doesn't make your case any stronger. Point is this scumbag had access to weapons and gear to carry out mass murder. The gear and weapons this scumbag was carrying go beyond the argument of self defense.

yay, someone with no clue about history, the constitution, or the reason why the revolution was fought. no wonder this country is fucked up with idiots like you.
 
Maybe the Colorado shooter got his guns from Oblablah through fast and furious. Since he an Smolder wont release the documents, we just don't know
 
Back
Top