Loser Libertarian Compares Obama to Aurora Shooter

[Cancel 2018. 3]

I'm much smarter than you, Yurtsie.

Of course you didn't ask about both sides; because you are only concerned about Bush. Just look at your response to this thread in general.

It's exceedingly telling.

interesting...you're still running away from two simple questions i asked you.

says a lot about you onceler.

go ahead....we both know you will keep running, then snipe from cover. you lack the courage to answer the hard questions. i dare you....put up my questions....answer them and then i will reply. until then....you are showing your usual cowardice. this is really embarrassing because my questions were actually very, very easy. why you chose to run..........well....

all you have to do to is answer two simple questions; for your convenience:

so that is the only double standard that applied to bush? that singular instance you referred to?

 

[Onceler]

interesting...you're still running away from two simple questions i asked you.

says a lot about you onceler.

go ahead....we both know you will keep running, then snipe from cover. you lack the courage to answer the hard questions. i dare you....put up my questions....answer them and then i will reply. until then....you are showing your usual cowardice. this is really embarrassing because my questions were actually very, very easy. why you chose to run..........well....

all you have to do to is answer two simple questions; for your convenience:

so that is the only double standard that applied to bush? that singular instance you referred to?

No - that's why I said people on both sides have double-standards. I never said there were "no" double-standards about Bush. There were lots of people who had double-standards regarding Bush, and then Obama.

But you're only obsessed with the ones about Bush; it's interesting. And apparently, my pointing out the occasional one someone has about Bush means I agree with you whole-heartedly in your monolithic, one-sided and hackish view that there are widespread double-standards about Bush, but very few on Obama.

And this thread is a great display of your wonderfully hypocritical view on this matter. If the billboard was about Bush, you'd have 2-3 threads on it already, demanding that we 'call them out.'

And you haven't said a thing about it. Oooooooops.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

No - that's why I said people on both sides have double-standards. I never said there were "no" double-standards about Bush. There were lots of people who had double-standards regarding Bush, and then Obama.

But you're only obsessed with the ones about Bush; it's interesting. And apparently, my pointing out the occasional one someone has about Bush means I agree with you whole-heartedly in your monolithic, one-sided and hackish view that there are widespread double-standards about Bush, but very few on Obama.

And this thread is a great display of your wonderfully hypocritical view on this matter. If the billboard was about Bush, you'd have 2-3 threads on it already, demanding that we 'call them out.'

And you haven't said a thing about it. Oooooooops.

seriously....you actually think you're smarter than me.....yet...you can't answer two simple questions.

spin away hackster. spin away.

you won't answer my questions because you know to do so shreds your entire position.

yea....you're so smart. you're an idiot that gets trapped with simple questions. and then you mumble and jumble and try to get your way out....but you can't. you can't answer my two questions.

if it makes you feel you better that you smarter than me....go for it. i would have tried to answer your questions. you didn't even try. and we know why.

 

[Onceler]

Yurt - did you miss the 1st word of my reply? It was "no"...that was an answer to your questions.

LOL LOL LOL

You're really such a stupid poster....

 

[Onceler]

And how does that "shred" my position?

You're really a fool.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

1. "no" was not a direct response to my question...it was in response to another post. "no" could have been to my first portion of that post. you could have manned up and said "no" in the first place.

2. thanks for admitting you didn't answer the second question.

that said. you admit you're a bush lover by your own standards. by answering no - you admit - you're a bush lover.

awesome. you're really too easy onceler.

 

[Minister of Truth]

This is pretty standard anti-war/anti-violence rhetoric. Accuse the President of being a serial killer, a baby killer, etc. It was commonplace in 1968, and remains so today...

 

[Onceler]

1. "no" was not a direct response to my question...it was in response to another post. "no" could have been to my first portion of that post. you could have manned up and said "no" in the first place.

2. thanks for admitting you didn't answer the second question.

that said. you admit you're a bush lover by your own standards. by answering no - you admit - you're a bush lover.

awesome. you're really too easy onceler.

The 2 questions were basically the same. If you want a formality, "no" and "no". LOL

And no, I'm not a Bush lover. The only way answering no "shreds" my position is if I argued that only one person had a double-standard about Bush, ever.

Do you remember me arguing that?

Yurt, you really have to try to grow a brain one of these days. LOL

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

you're hilarious onceler....you really are. the "one person" thing is 1. a lie; 2 nonsense.

face the facts little buddy, you got busted in your own hypocrisy and are doing your darn best to spin your way out. your position wasn't about one person, it was about an idea of that person did. don't be such a dishonest hack. sheeesh. i know you are smarter than that, i hope.

you made a position, the very same position, that you accused others of being hacks and loving bush. and when shown that, you have been desperately, painfully, trying to pull yourself out of that position. one person? really?

your words:

And you're certainly right about the double-standard; Bush had stuff like the billboard in the OP thrown at him every week.

still want to stick to that one person defense onceler?

 

[Onceler]

you're hilarious onceler....you really are. the "one person" thing is 1. a lie; 2 nonsense.

face the facts little buddy, you got busted in your own hypocrisy and are doing your darn best to spin your way out. your position wasn't about one person, it was about an idea of that person did. don't be such a dishonest hack. sheeesh. i know you are smarter than that, i hope.

you made a position, the very same position, that you accused others of being hacks and loving bush. and when shown that, you have been desperately, painfully, trying to pull yourself out of that position. one person? really?

your words:



still want to stick to that one person defense onceler?

Not a defense. Are you confusing "double standard" with actual actions? Not surprising. I was just agreeing w/ WB that the poster in question on this thread shouldn't have 2 views on the ACTION taken against Obama here, and any of those taken against Bush when he was Prez.

You are a junkie for false equivalencies. Truly.

 

[Onceler]

And this thread is a great display of your wonderfully hypocritical view on this matter. If the billboard was about Bush, you'd have 2-3 threads on it already, demanding that we 'call them out.'

And you haven't said a thing about it. Oooooooops.

By the way - did you miss this?

Now, THAT is hypocrisy, Yurts.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Not a defense. Are you confusing "double standard" with actual actions? Not surprising. I was just agreeing w/ WB that the poster in question on this thread shouldn't have 2 views on the ACTION taken against Obama here, and any of those taken against Bush when he was Prez.

You are a junkie for false equivalencies. Truly.

still can't answer question 2. not surprising.

spin away onceler. you're not very good at even spinning, but....you have a grand floor here at JPP

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

By the way - did you miss this?

Now, THAT is hypocrisy, Yurts.

i ignored it because it is nothing more than your futile deflections.

this isn't about me..............it is about YOUR statement.

i don't understand why you just don't admit you agree with me. what is it with you?

 

[Onceler]

still can't answer question 2. not surprising.

spin away onceler. you're not very good at even spinning, but....you have a grand floor here at JPP

Question #2? I already said "no & no." My goodness.

You just realized that you confused the actions (things like this billboard, and the actions against Bush I referred to), with the double-standards that some have about them, didn't you?

At least you realized it. A world of entertainment watching your thought process work, as always...

 

[Onceler]

i ignored it because it is nothing more than your futile deflections.

this isn't about me..............it is about YOUR statement.

i don't understand why you just don't admit you agree with me. what is it with you?

But if it WAS about you, on this thread - and your reaction to it....it would be a pretty hypocritical tale, right?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

so now it is two no's? lol...before it was only one.

onceler. we should have been brothers.....the fights would have been awesome.

good night onceler. btw.....i like you.

 

[Onceler]

The 2 questions were basically the same. If you want a formality, "no" and "no".

Guess you missed this.

Now, why not try answering some of my questions, Yurtsie? I've asked a few over the past few responses.

Are you afraid? LOL

Run away, Yurt. Run, run away....

 

[Granule]

This is why Libertarians are twinge-worthy fringe scum. The billboard, btw, is mantained by the Idaho Freedom Foundation, an avowed racist militia group

What's the problem, Howey? Both have zero respect for life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. Get over yourself.

 

[wanderingbear]

I think you ment to say liberals not libertarians.I totally agree with that sign. Obama hasnt stoped the war in Afganistan. He should have ended bouth wars as soon as he entered office. He hasnt done that so Im voteing for Jill Stine.

 

[ekg]

So how many sons and daughters have died so Obama didn't anger the right wing? He campaigned on a promise to bring our soldiers home. .

no he didn't.. he campaigned on ending Iraq..he eyes were always on Afghanistan..

In what is being billed as a major policy speech, Obama declared this morning that if elected president, he would redirect attention and US forces to Afghanistan
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/07/obama_afghanist.html

If you are blaming the NRA for the deaths at the hands of lunatocs, do you credit them with some of the times ordinary civilians used guns to stop crimes?

the NRA gets blame because they are religious in their approach.. after Columbine, they didn't stop and say "Ya know what, some crazy people get guns and we don't condone that in anyway"... nawp.. instead, they had their rally across the way from the school and Heston gave his 'waaa they don't want us here' speech....

I mean c'mon.. there is a time and place for everything.. the NRA, otoh, sees this type of tragedy as way to stand up and say "my cold dead hands motherfucker" to anyone who says "Hey wait, maybe nut-cases shouldn't have guns"..

the're kinda shitty and they deserve the disdain because of it..