GOP Platform: Women Not Human

ZappasGuitar said:
So the guy who set the bar for this discussion with 6 pages of non-stop partisan hyperbole is now going to whine because someone decided to use his own tricks against him?

Cry me a hyperbolic river.
Click to expand...

Is this you idea of a debate? Again, it is a statement of fact that it is a child. Genetics prove it. No matter how much you wish to deny this simple fact, it will not change.
 
Superfreak said:
Is this you idea of a debate? Again, it is a statement of fact that it is a child. Genetics prove it. No matter how much you wish to deny this simple fact, it will not change.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. And it is a child when it is the product of rape and then aborted, too. So what is your point with this?
 
blackascoal said:
Nope. Abortion is not slavery .. and its legal.
Click to expand...

Slavery was legal at a time too. That didn't make it right. and yes, I am aware the two are not the same, it is the dehumanization and the treatement of unique human beings as 'property' to do with as one pleases that is the same.

Quite admirable my friend.
Click to expand...

That said, I a have not adopted nor raised a kid on my own.

No, I never tell them that. Why would I?
Click to expand...

Because that is the opposite of what you are suggesting to me. You are saying that if I have not adopted them, then I should be ok with their mothers having aborted them instead.

Have you looked them in the face and adopted them? No?
Click to expand...

No. Because I choose not to be a parent. I choose to actually use protection when I have sex. I choose to have sex with women who also are on the pill as a safeguard. If after all of that I become a father, then I will raise that child and not shirk my responsibilities.

Then you have no standing.
Click to expand...

That is absurd. That is like saying you don't believe in firefighters because you have never fought fires. It is like my saying to you 'have you ever told kids in an adoption agency they would have been better off if their mothers had aborted them' and then to proclaim that if you haven't you have no standing in this discussion.

It's just that simple
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yes, so I still have standing....I don't know what an "unwanted" child is......the waiting list for adoptions is years long.....
Click to expand...



You're a fucking fool. Go back and read some of my posts on this.

There's only a waiting list for pretty newborn healthy white babies. All the rest are "unwanted". WHY AREN'T YOU PUSHING FOR THEIR ADOPTION? Why are you allowing them to sit languishing in group homes?
 
let's see...darla's logic is that if you don't support abortion, you hate women.....following that convoluted logic, darla hates human life.
 
Howey said:
You're a fucking fool. Go back and read some of my posts on this.

There's only a waiting list for pretty newborn healthy white babies. All the rest are "unwanted". WHY AREN'T YOU PUSHING FOR THEIR ADOPTION? Why are you allowing them to sit languishing in group homes?
Click to expand...

why don't you?
 
enough said:
let's see...darla's logic is that if you don't support abortion, you hate women.....following that convoluted logic, darla hates human life.
Click to expand...

No, her assertion is that if you don't support a woman's right to CHOOSE abortion, you hate women. And that's accurate.
 
Superfreak said:
Is this you idea of a debate? Again, it is a statement of fact that it is a child. Genetics prove it. No matter how much you wish to deny this simple fact, it will not change.
Click to expand...


No it's not...but for the past 6+ pages YOUR idea of "debate" has been one hyperbolic partisan post after another. I merely engaged you on the level you spent 6 pages establishing.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No it's not...but for the past 6+ pages YOUR idea of "debate" has been one hyperbolic partisan post after another. I merely engaged you on the level you spent 6 pages establishing.
Click to expand...

it is always someone else's fault that you engage in stupidity....lmao....you completely ignore darla's maniac posting and simply go after SF
 
enough said:
it is always someone else's fault that you engage in stupidity....lmao....you completely ignore darla's maniac posting and simply go after SF
Click to expand...


What did I tell everyone?


So much for Yurt's vaunted "you're ignored".

As it turns out...it was just another YURT LIE.
 
 
 
Darla said:
That's not what I said. I specifically said I was referring to supporting the Republican party which now embraces the personhood amendment as its platform. You need to read that language because it's what you'll be voting for. If you cannot understand what i write, sit in the dunce corner with SF.
Click to expand...

I vote for a party platform? Really? that's news to me.
 
blackascoal said:
Humans have been aborting unwanted babies since the invention of babies .. and no, I do not believe that any woman should be forced to have any child that she does not want. I do think there should be some consideration of the father .. and perhaps she can have the child and turn it over to the father. Men can raise children by themselves if necessary. I've done it twice.

That being said, I do not agree with you brother. Have you ever looked into the faces of unwanted children? I have.

Have you felt their pain? I have.

More importantly, are you willing to adopt unwanted children?

If not, then you have no standing .. nor does anyone else who doesn't have to care for them.
Click to expand...

At least one male on the left stands up for men's considerations on this issue and he's not even a Democrat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top