Why do I lie so often?
Wow... Jughead is actually allowing his mind to think this might be a real possibility? That's a change!
What we see here is Jughead's typical 'gesturing' ...it's usually in the form of 'condemning' something that his side has said or done that he knows can't be defended. Somehow, it makes it alright for him to continue to support these maggots because he "strongly condemns" something on a message board... but what does that really mean? It's just words, followed by no actions. Same thing with this, Jughead claims he won't be hostile toward Romney, he'll support him going forward... (but he'll oppose basically everything Romney does.) Nice little caveat he gives himself there, isn't it?
I know of NO ONE who wished for Obama to fail. Most of us knew his policies would fail, and they did. I know of NO ONE who dislikes Obama because of his race, but that is constantly the charge against ANY who oppose his ideas. I guess I should take a page out of Jughead's playbook here and say that I "strongly condemn" anyone who doesn't like Obama because he is black, but frankly, I don't know of anyone who has stated such a thing. If they do exist, I strongly condemn them! There! Now I can oppose Obama and everything he does, because I have "strongly condemned" those who don't like Obama because he is a black man. Something tells me I will still be accused of being racist.
Let me ask a question here to the liberals... How many right-wing Fox News types have been out there referring to the president as "Mr. Obama" instead of "the president" or "President Obama?" During the Bush years, liberal media literally refused to call Bush the president! They constantly referred to him in their stories as "Mr. Bush!" I don't think I've heard Obama referred to as "Mr. Obama" once.
Don't bother wasting your money on a stamp.
If any republican gets in you'll be too busy looking for somewhere to hide 'cos you are going to be one hated nation.
And you are a bit underwhelming yourself. A self fulfilling prophecy would have been if Obama had said "my presidency is going to SUCK big time!" And then taken active steps HIMSELF(hence the SELF in SELF fulfilling prophecy)to make that prediction come true. I wasn't predicting ANYTHING, based on the facts at my disposal, I KNEW he was going to suck big time and I didn't lift a finger to make it happen. Go ahead and ask him, I'll bet Obama will tell you that everything is going just peachy right now thanks to his outstanding leadership.I understood fine just like I uinderstand this post fine.
It's called a self fulfilling prophecy. Putting the defeat of one politician ahead of the needs of the country is not what most people elect congressmen for.
Your world is a fantasy world to me. Defending the present congress is idiotic at best. Your stupity underwhelms me.
Dixie is a lying idiot.
I have a question.
If Obama is such a failure .. and he is on many levels .. why isn't your candidate running away with this election?
Why hasn't your candidate topped the national polls even once?
Do you have an honest, non-partisan, non I hate Obama answer for that?
And you are a bit underwhelming yourself. A self fulfilling prophecy would have been if Obama had said "my presidency is going to SUCK big time!" And then taken active steps HIMSELF(hence the SELF in SELF fulfilling prophecy)to make that prediction come true. I wasn't predicting ANYTHING, based on the facts at my disposal, I KNEW he was going to suck big time and I didn't lift a finger to make it happen. Go ahead and ask him, I'll bet Obama will tell you that everything is going just peachy right now thanks to his outstanding leadership.
And you think I'm living in a fantasy world? You don't recall this little gem, do you?:
Really? Because you just posted several video clips of Republicans referring to Obama as "President Obama" and not "Mr. Obama" as your side often referred to Bush. This proves what I said to be true. Now, apparently, you think that Republicans should have some other priority besides defeating Obama's bid for re-election, and I never have claimed that Republicans don't want to deny him a second term. In fact, it is about as stupid as it gets, to think that should or would be the case.
I know of NO ONE who wished for Obama to fail. QUOTE]
If you don't know what the leaders of your own party want, you are either a liar or an idiot. You tell me which.
No, because I posted several videos of republicans stating they wanted Obama to fail. Not just any republicans either, but party leadership, and THAT makes youy a liar.
I know of NO ONE who wished for Obama to fail.
If you don't know what the leaders of your own party want, you are either a liar or an idiot. You tell me which.
Sorry, I watched every clip again, not once did anyone say they hoped Obama would fail. They repeatedly say they hope to defeat Obama and hope he fails at being re-elected, but what should Republicans hope for, an Obama win? lol... are you that idiotic and stupid?
You are a real dipshit. And a stupid one to boot!
What is a faked video of an idiot supposed to prove?
You are severely pwned and too stupid to know it.
Sorry, I watched every clip again, not once did anyone say they hoped Obama would fail.
As I said in another thread, we have a weird political paradigm going on. For whatever reasons, 48% of this country is going to support Obama no matter what happens or what he says or does. They are not voting for the Republican, it doesn't matter what he says or who he/she is, that's never been an option. When you have this kind of devoted solidarity, regardless of anything else, it's hard to overcome.
I said all along, the Republicans should have acknowledged this fact, and nominated a real firebrand, like Newt or Bachmann, who would have taken the gloves off and gone after Obama relentlessly. The passive nature of Romney scares me, and Ryan isn't much better. They have great attributes and are very level headed, but they don't know how to fight Chicago-style gutter thug politics. We'll have to see how it plays out on election day, much depends on turnout. But it's absolutely stunning to me, this election will be decided by people who currently can't decided between Conservative and Liberal.
Polls don't mean a whole lot to me, unless they are showing some dramatic difference, they aren't generally reliable. Most of the polls I have seen, have both candidates within the margin of error. Most interesting is this analysis, from the University of Colorado:
http://www.colorado.edu/news/releas...nts-romney-win-university-colorado-study-says
For the last 8 presidential elections, this model has correctly predicted the winner of the presidential race. According to their analysis, President Barack Obama will win 218 votes in the Electoral College, short of the 270 he needs. And though they chiefly focus on the Electoral College, the political scientists predict Romney will win 52.9 percent of the popular vote to Obama’s 47.1 percent, when considering only the two major political parties.
But again... we have a paradigm we've never seen in American politics. Never before has a man garnered so much solidarity of support, regardless of all other factors, so the UC model may have met it's match with this election... it remains to be seen.
I think Romney just needs to re-run all of Obama's "Hope and Change" promises, from 2008. That alone should be enough to remind everyone of Obama's failure to do anything.
And then when they try to blame it on Congress and the Senate, all he has to do is show the numbers of Democrats vs Republicans during his first two years.