New Seal Book: Bin Laden Unarmed .. and Already Dead

first, as for pakistan, pakistan has been both unwilling and unable to police its own country and as such has allowed nato enemies to use pakistan's territory to stage attacks on nato personnel

second, no us military have been injured in either libya or iran + any action against iran would not be comprised of troops invading iran

third, what does the ny shooting have to do with obama

fourth, i have already said that i would like to see our troops removed from afghanistan as soon as physically possible

fifth, please provide a cite for the 'thousands' of innocents killed by the us and nato and a more precise number other than 'thousands' which can range from over 1000 to under 1 million or if you prefer under 10,000

The fact that no US soldiers were killed in Libya doesn't make it any less an atrocity. No US soldiers were killed because we used AL QUEDA to do the fighting .. just as we are using them in Syria .. many of the same AL QUEDA fighters who admittedly killed US soldiers in Iraq.

All true, all provable.

Not sending troops to Iran won't make that any less an act of state-terrorism. And, given the world participation in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Summit in Tehran this past weekend, I would suggest that any attack of Iran will be seen globally as an act of state-terrorism. Iran has a right to develop its nuclear program just as Israel and everybody else does .. and NAM agrees.
 
first, as for pakistan, pakistan has been both unwilling and unable to police its own country and as such has allowed nato enemies to use pakistan's territory to stage attacks on nato personnel

second, no us military have been injured in either libya or iran + any action against iran would not be comprised of troops invading iran

third, what does the ny shooting have to do with obama

fourth, i have already said that i would like to see our troops removed from afghanistan as soon as physically possible

fifth, please provide a cite for the 'thousands' of innocents killed by the us and nato and a more precise number other than 'thousands' which can range from over 1000 to under 1 million or if you prefer under 10,000
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
Which gives the civilian deaths in Iraq as over 100,000.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf
Gives the Afghan civilian deaths as 11,864 since 2006 when they started collecting data.

Oh and we're past 2,000 american soldiers dead in afghanistan, do we have to wait until as many are dead there as died on 9/11? It Would give it a nice symmetry. But obama has accomplished his mission, nobody can say he hasn't carried on the imperialist state of the US exactly like a white president would have.
 
The fact that no US soldiers were killed in Libya doesn't make it any less an atrocity. No US soldiers were killed because we used AL QUEDA to do the fighting .. just as we are using them in Syria .. many of the same AL QUEDA fighters who admittedly killed US soldiers in Iraq.

All true, all provable.

Not sending troops to Iran won't make that any less an act of state-terrorism. And, given the world participation in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Summit in Tehran this past weekend, I would suggest that any attack of Iran will be seen globally as an act of state-terrorism. Iran has a right to develop its nuclear program just as Israel and everybody else does .. and NAM agrees.

maybe the nam (who are not as non-aligned as some would think) would think so, but what about the arab league?

i think that the arab league would be relieved to have iran's nuclear program destroyed

perhaps iran would not be foolish enough to attack israel with nuclear tipped missiles

also, if iran develops nuclear weapons, others in the me will want nuclear weapons, especially the saudis

do we want a nuclear standoff or war in the me

iran has declared that israel should be destroyed

where do you stand on the likely nuclear problem in the me...should we just stand on the sidelines or act in our own interests
 
maybe the nam (who are not as non-aligned as some would think) would think so, but what about the arab league?

i think that the arab league would be relieved to have iran's nuclear program destroyed

perhaps iran would not be foolish enough to attack israel with nuclear tipped missiles

also, if iran develops nuclear weapons, others in the me will want nuclear weapons, especially the saudis

do we want a nuclear standoff or war in the me

iran has declared that israel should be destroyed

where do you stand on the likely nuclear problem in the me...should we just stand on the sidelines or act in our own interests

I believe it would be unlikely that Iran would fire the first shot unless backed into a corner. They have too much to lose. On the other hand, they must be dealing with foreign aggression or they would not feel the need to defend themselves. Ever since The Iranian revolution overthrew the western puppet the Shaw? And Nationalized the oil companies? Iran has been a target of the west. The question remains. Why does Iran hate Israel? What do the Israelis(Jews) have to do with BP oil? I think things are happening behind the scenes that the masses are not aware of.
 
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
Which gives the civilian deaths in Iraq as over 100,000.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf
Gives the Afghan civilian deaths as 11,864 since 2006 when they started collecting data.

Oh and we're past 2,000 american soldiers dead in afghanistan, do we have to wait until as many are dead there as died on 9/11? It Would give it a nice symmetry. But obama has accomplished his mission, nobody can say he hasn't carried on the imperialist state of the US exactly like a white president would have.

you did not answer all of my questions also, do the statistics include civilians killed by enemy (taliban and others) actions

also, from the article you cited

Because the estimates of Afghan casualties contained in this report are based on varying time
periods and have been created using different methodologies, readers should exercise caution
when using them and should look to them as guideposts rather than as statements of fact.
 
maybe the nam (who are not as non-aligned as some would think) would think so, but what about the arab league?

i think that the arab league would be relieved to have iran's nuclear program destroyed

perhaps iran would not be foolish enough to attack israel with nuclear tipped missiles

also, if iran develops nuclear weapons, others in the me will want nuclear weapons, especially the saudis

do we want a nuclear standoff or war in the me

iran has declared that israel should be destroyed

where do you stand on the likely nuclear problem in the me...should we just stand on the sidelines or act in our own interests

If we have nothing to say about Israel's nukes, then we should have nothing to say of any relevance about the nuclear program in Iran. We won't even force Israel to declare what nukes they have.

Obviously we believe that we have the right to do and declare whatever we want .. but the world does not agree.

The good news is that the world is re-aligning because they see the US and Israel as the greatest threats to peace. Who else travels thousands of miles from their shores to attack and destroy small nations that pose no threat to them?

The world is re-aligning and a counter-balance to NATO has formed in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

The US/NATO attack and destruction of Libya using Al Queda was a line in the sand for much of the world. It was a vivid demonstration that the US cannot be trusted and that we are indeed a terrorist nation. SEE: Pakistan
 
If she did she was told to do so. Or he shot himself. Either way, it cost us intell, but at least he is no longer a factor.

I personally do not believe they wanted to capture him alive. The circus that would have been his trial would not have likely been worth the intel we might have gotten from him.
 
I personally do not believe they wanted to capture him alive. The circus that would have been his trial would not have likely been worth the intel we might have gotten from him.

Bin Laden was a US created bogeyman who left the plantation.

Bin Laden was NOT involved in 9/11 .. was never charged with it.

That's just the bullshit they told the American people.

And, Al Queda .. they're our friends now .. working directly with the CIA.

.. amazing how well mindfuck works. :0)
 
Bin Laden was a US created bogeyman who left the plantation.

Bin Laden was NOT involved in 9/11 .. was never charged with it.

That's just the bullshit they told the American people.

And, Al Queda .. they're our friends now .. working directly with the CIA.

.. amazing how well mindfuck works. :0)

so you support dictators that siphon money from their subjects/slaves and kill and torture them

also, please provide links to support your claims

also, it was not just the us that attacked libya

ps obl claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attack along with other attacks on peoples that he felt were his enemies...other arabs that did not share his religious and political beliefs

cite?
 
Bin Laden was a US created bogeyman who left the plantation.

He did not leave the plantation, we abandoned Bin Laden and other Afghan fighters after they kicked the Soviets out. We left the power vacuum that was filled by the Taliban.

Bin Laden was NOT involved in 9/11 .. was never charged with it.

LOL... ok.

That's just the bullshit they told the American people.

despite all evidence to the contrary... yeah... sorry, but this conspiracy theory of yours does not hold up under scrutiny.

And, Al Queda .. they're our friends now .. working directly with the CIA.

Link..

.. amazing how well mindfuck works. :0)

yeah, the real question is who got to you? ;)
 
I believe it would be unlikely that Iran would fire the first shot unless backed into a corner. They have too much to lose. On the other hand, they must be dealing with foreign aggression or they would not feel the need to defend themselves. Ever since The Iranian revolution overthrew the western puppet the Shaw? And Nationalized the oil companies? Iran has been a target of the west. The question remains. Why does Iran hate Israel? What do the Israelis(Jews) have to do with BP oil? I think things are happening behind the scenes that the masses are not aware of.

do you have any facts to back up your beliefs

also, iran is run by religious fanatics, so who knows what they will do
 
Bin Laden was a US created bogeyman who left the plantation.

Bin Laden was NOT involved in 9/11 .. was never charged with it.

That's just the bullshit they told the American people.

And, Al Queda .. they're our friends now .. working directly with the CIA.

.. amazing how well mindfuck works. :0)

1)Bin Laden either worked with the Elites( He came from an Arabian Elite family with ties to the Saudi King and thus America(Especially the Bush Family), whom(The Bin Laden Family) have joint business ventures with the Bush family via the Carlyle group(who are right now facing some serious allegations in Kuwait).

OR it was a fallout between two elites and they went to war. I believe it was the first.

2) First Bin Laden congratulated those involved in 9/11 but never took responsibility. He denied it. When fingers started pointing at an inside job? He stepped up to claim responsibility(scapegoat).

Either they told him to be the scapegoat, or he tried to claim responsibility and ride the wave of popularity in the east. I believe it was the first.

3) Al-Qaeda never really existed. It is a fabrication of the CIA. The Taliban(Including Osama) were supported and trained by the US secret service(CIA), the Saudi and the Pakistan secret service. Since the CIA is a big player in trafficking narcotics? I wouldn't be surprised if this deal involved opium trafficking. Either for Heroin or Pharmaceutical production.

The Muslims perceived this as an attack on Islam and many rose up for Jihad. These people then became labelled terrorists and Al-Qaeda operatives. When they were only defending Islam. Sad how most of the people killed in this war on terror are SUSPECTED terrorists. DO you know why they are suspected? Because there are no terrorists!
 
so you support dictators that siphon money from their subjects/slaves and kill and torture them

also, please provide links to support your claims

also, it was not just the us that attacked libya

ps obl claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attack along with other attacks on peoples that he felt were his enemies...other arabs that did not share his religious and political beliefs

cite?

You are a victim of the mindfuck I spoke of brother.

A. Bin Laden NEVER claimed responsibility for 9/11. What you saw "confessing" was not Bin Laden.


Dick Cheney and Bush both have said very directly that Bin Laden was not directly involved in 9/11 .. and the FBI never charged him with it..


An admission of guilt is evidence. So if the fake Bin Laden tape had been credible, don't you think the FBI would have charged him with it?

So where did you get Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 from? .. You got it from the mindfuck. It was just made up bullshit .. like the Toppling of Saddam's statue or the "rescue" of Jessica Lynch.

B. With all due respect brother .. and I do respect you .. you don't know what you're talking about with regards to Libya.

Are you aware that Libyans enjoyed the highest standard of living throughout all of Africa, higher even than that of Russians and Brazilians?

Are you aware that Gaddaffi used his nations resources to build the Great Man-Made River .. the 9th Wonder of the World .. which provides water to millions of Africans?

Are you aware that Libyans, all Libyans, got a percentage of the OIl revenues deposited in their bank accounts every month?

I bet you aren't aware of any of this in this video .. all true, all provable ..


Did you know that the largest demonstration in world history happened in Libya as the Libyan people came out AGAINST NATO bombing and FOR Gaddafi? One third of the entire country came out WHILE their country was being bombed by Obama and NATO ..


You've been tricked and played brother.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top