New Seal Book: Bin Laden Unarmed .. and Already Dead

224a27dede9416345606074fe9ecaf7a.jpg
 
The fact that no US soldiers were killed in Libya doesn't make it any less an atrocity. No US soldiers were killed because we used AL QUEDA to do the fighting .. just as we are using them in Syria .. many of the same AL QUEDA fighters who admittedly killed US soldiers in Iraq.All true, all provable.Not sending troops to Iran won't make that any less an act of state-terrorism. And, given the world participation in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Summit in Tehran this past weekend, I would suggest that any attack of Iran will be seen globally as an act of state-terrorism. Iran has a right to develop its nuclear program just as Israel and everybody else does .. and NAM agrees.
So, if we send in troops we are waging war, and if we don't send in troops we are committing terrorism? What happens is we throw a parade - elevated threat levels?
 
So, if we send in troops we are waging war, and if we don't send in troops we are committing terrorism? What happens is we throw a parade - elevated threat levels?

If we kill somebody its murder, if we pay/arm somebody to kill it's murder by proxy.

Full marks for failing to understand.
 
"winding down" interesting how that took four years, after bush left office, and we're not even done yet. Obama is hardly a peacemaker, he's been carrying on drone terrorism with Pakistan(our theoretical ally) bombing Libya, making threats against Iran and taking a small eternity to get out of Afghanistan. His claim to fame is taking out bin laden(who was in neither Afghanistan, Libya or Iraq) and killing thousands just to be sure he got the right guy.

For some perspective please look at the threads about the NY shooting and the attacks on cops who wounded 9 bystanders trying to stop an active shooter. Obama was killing people who weren't even on the same continent. That's some collateral damage there.

WTF are you talking about? He is pulling out on the schedule which Bush established.
 
Back
Top