Is the Romney bounce fading?

Jughead...why do you say Ronmey numbers are fading.....hes come from -9's and -7's last month to +1 and +2 in most polls in October....

That's 'fading' to you ?
 
Haiku said:
Romney didn't get a bump...the polls are being used this election to influence the outcome. Rove is playing his games because 'he believes in democracy'.... he's another winger criminal but no matter...their peeps will vote for anyone as long as they aren't black, brown or liberul.
Click to expand...


Yeah....theres 15 or 20 different polls listed and Rove is in control of them all.................get real, fool
 
Jarod said:
I went to the link, looked at the right side and it says.... Romney is up by .1%.

I cannot find your mythical number anywhere.
Click to expand...

they update the site as new polls come in you colossal douche bag. Ditzie saw the numbers right before the latest update. It wasn't mythical in the least. What IS mythical is the 'fade' you referred to as well as the 'people changing their minds' that you stated occurred.
 
Amazing how I knew those numbers before they were updated... Wow, I'm even smarter than I thought.
 
Jarod said:
Amazing how I knew those numbers before they were updated... Wow, I'm even smarter than I thought.
Click to expand...

Let's run through it one more time for your pathetically stupid ass...

The RCP website had two different sets of numbers posted, you copied and pasted one, I copied and pasted the other. Yours was the current data, mine was the previous data that hadn't been updated yet. I pointed out that the site had two conflicting sets of data, and presumed it was because they hadn't updated. You continued to make a big deal out of this, calling me a "liar" and blustering over the variation. The site then updated the inaccurate table, and all the numbers now match. This isn't a sign of your telepathic ability, just a sign of slow-ass webmasters who failed to update all the tables at the same time.

Regardless of which set of numbers you use, the values are STILL within the margin of error. So all of you blustering and name-calling is meaningless with regard to your failed point. If it makes you feel better to have posted the current information while I posted outdated information, then more power to ya! I am happy for you, Jughead, really I am... so little for you to be optimistic about these days... so few things you can hang your hat on or victories you can claim. While you were bird-dogging the RCP for an update, I was talking to two undecided voters, and I believe I convinced them to vote for Romney.... of course, the RCP poll will not reflect this for a few more days, but oh fucking well.
 
Dixie said:
While you were bird-dogging the RCP for an update, I was talking to two undecided voters, and I believe I convinced them to vote for Romney....
Click to expand...

Another vein of comedy gold from The Dix...
 
Superfreak said:
they update the site as new polls come in you colossal douche bag. Ditzie saw the numbers right before the latest update. It wasn't mythical in the least. What IS mythical is the 'fade' you referred to as well as the 'people changing their minds' that you stated occurred.
Click to expand...
Amazing how I knew those numbers before they were updated... Wow, I'm even smarter than I thought.
 
Dixie said:
Let's run through it one more time for your pathetically stupid ass...

The RCP website had two different sets of numbers posted, you copied and pasted one, I copied and pasted the other. Yours was the current data, mine was the previous data that hadn't been updated yet. I pointed out that the site had two conflicting sets of data, and presumed it was because they hadn't updated. You continued to make a big deal out of this, calling me a "liar" and blustering over the variation. The site then updated the inaccurate table, and all the numbers now match. This isn't a sign of your telepathic ability, just a sign of slow-ass webmasters who failed to update all the tables at the same time.

Regardless of which set of numbers you use, the values are STILL within the margin of error. So all of you blustering and name-calling is meaningless with regard to your failed point. If it makes you feel better to have posted the current information while I posted outdated information, then more power to ya! I am happy for you, Jughead, really I am... so little for you to be optimistic about these days... so few things you can hang your hat on or victories you can claim. While you were bird-dogging the RCP for an update, I was talking to two undecided voters, and I believe I convinced them to vote for Romney.... of course, the RCP poll will not reflect this for a few more days, but oh fucking well.
Click to expand...

Dixie you are funny, I'll give you that.

Please note that I did not call you a liar and I did not say the bump was fading, I asked a question in both circumstances!
 
Jarod said:
Amazing how I knew those numbers before they were updated... Wow, I'm even smarter than I thought.
Click to expand...

You are an idiot. You continue to fail to back up your moronic claims. You continue to run away from the fact that none of the polls show what you are saying. You continue to think that RCP only has the numbers in one place on their website. They don't. You pulled from one location, he pulled from another. You are too fucking retarded to comprehend that.
 
Jarod said:
If the President does well tomorrow they will give him credit for this but it looks to me like the Romney debate bounce is already starting to fade...


realclearpolitics.com
Click to expand...

yeah Jarod, you did say you thought he was fading. Are you too stupid to remember what you posted?
 
Haiku said:
Romney didn't get a bump...the polls are being used this election to influence the outcome. Rove is playing his games because 'he believes in democracy'.... he's another winger criminal but no matter...their peeps will vote for anyone as long as they aren't black, brown or liberul.
Click to expand...

LOL. Dang. You sound very much like some of the conservatives sounded just a couple weeks ago. That's funny stuff. My point has been that the oversampling of certain groups affects the polls, the problem you have is showing that conservatives are the groups being oversampled.
 
Superfreak said:
So Jarod, apparently YOU are the liar.
Click to expand...

I was wrong you are correct... However I did not call Dixie a liar.

Now look at the charts, all of them they show a fading bump, that trend may not continue, especally after tonight if Romney wins again... but pre-debate, every groping of polls shows a fading bump. As Romney's numbers went up, Obama's went down. As Obama's began to climb, Romneys began to drop. Its as simple as that. I wanted to point it out before the debate because if the President does well tonight, the media will say it was all due to his performance, I will not belive so, I will belive that the trend had already begun. The presidents performance may help the trend to continue, but there is a natural resting point for these numbers and after events fade they seem to want to return to return to that point.
 
Jarod said:
I was wrong you are correct... However I did not call Dixie a liar.

Now look at the charts, all of them they show a fading bump, that trend may not continue, especally after tonight if Romney wins again... but pre-debate, every groping of polls shows a fading bump. As Romney's numbers went up, Obama's went down. As Obama's began to climb, Romneys began to drop. Its as simple as that. I wanted to point it out before the debate because if the President does well tonight, the media will say it was all due to his performance, I will not belive so, I will belive that the trend had already begun. The presidents performance may help the trend to continue, but there is a natural resting point for these numbers and after events fade they seem to want to return to return to that point.
Click to expand...

Again Jarod, the above is blatantly false. Look at any individual poll and compare it to the same polls previous numbers. There is not a fade. Not in any single one of them.
 
Superfreak said:
Again Jarod, the above is blatantly false. Look at any individual poll and compare it to the same polls previous numbers. There is not a fade. Not in any single one of them.
Click to expand...

I am not looking at individual polls, I am looking at the conglomeration of polls, I feel that is a more accurate indicator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top