What a landslide looks like

just because it is not close, does not mean it was a landslide. obama won a few more states than romney. states with large electoral votes. big whooop.

obama received only 2% more of the popular vote. and you consider that a landslide?

These people do YURT...

121108-landslide.jpg
 
These people do YURT...

121108-landslide.jpg

You got that right. I remember Republicans lecturing us about their mandate when Bush won FL by 500 votes & lost the popular vote, and when Bush beat Kerry by 1 state.

If Romney had Obama's margin of victory, there would be no question - it would be an epic landslide & sweeping mandate, and a country-wide repudiation of liberalism.

What a crock. Democrats won, and they won BIG.
 
A Landslide Loss for Big Money

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/opinion/sunday/a-landslide-loss-for-big-money.html?_r=0


[h=1]Landslide victory in electoral college gives President Obama some leverage (Joey Kennedy)
[/h]
[url]http://blog.al.com/jkennedy//print.html

[/URL]


still can't explain how this election is a landslide....wow...i knew you were just a boring troll ken...but i honestly thought you could actually give some input and debate a point.

my mistake.
 
can someone explain to me how the 2012 election is a landslide for obama?

thank you.
The 2008 election wasn't a landslide and he won with 70% more votes then.

This eerily (did I spell that right? lol) mirrors the 2004 election and no, not a landslide.

A landslide is winning by 16-20 million votes. This is razor thin.
 
liberal translation:

there is no landslide or mandate, so will say butt hurt over and over, because really, we are the butt hurt
 
Back
Top