Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
and no surprise kenneth does not actually discuss the topic, instead he posts some song.


just because it is not close, does not mean it was a landslide. obama won a few more states than romney. states with large electoral votes. big whooop.
obama received only 2% more of the popular vote. and you consider that a landslide?
and no surprise kenneth does not actually discuss the topic, instead he posts some song.
![]()
These people do YURT...
![]()
A Landslide Loss for Big Money
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/opinion/sunday/a-landslide-loss-for-big-money.html?_r=0
[h=1]Landslide victory in electoral college gives President Obama some leverage (Joey Kennedy)
[/h]
[url]http://blog.al.com/jkennedy//print.html
[/URL]
These people do YURT...
![]()
Nice ignoring slow ambulance chaser
LMFAO
The 2008 election wasn't a landslide and he won with 70% more votes then.can someone explain to me how the 2012 election is a landslide for obama?
thank you.
No, it would not be.If Romney had Obama's margin of victory, there would be no question - it would be an epic landslide & sweeping mandate, and a country-wide repudiation of liberalism.
.
popular vote
obama 50.1%
romney 48.4%
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/who-won-the-popular-vote-2012_n_2087038.html
not a landslide there either
2-3 million votes is duller than that when you think of other Presidents who won with close to 20 million votes, a 20 pt margin.300 to 200 man that's a dull razor
No, it would not be.
I'm enjoying the neocon meltdown way too much. Thanks hillbillies.