Pagan Roots? 5 Surprising Facts About Christmas

http://www.thehistoryofchristmas.com/ch/before_christ.htm

History of Christmas - Before Christ?

The middle of winter has long been a time of celebration around the world. Centuries before the arrival of the man called Jesus, early Europeans celebrated light and birth in the darkest days of winter. Many peoples rejoiced during the winter solstice, when the worst of the winter was behind them and they could look forward to longer days and extended hours of sunlight. In Scandinavia, the Norse celebrated Yule from December 21, the winter solstice, through January. In recognition of the return of the sun, fathers and sons would bring home large logs, which they would set on fire. The people would feast until the log burned out, which could take as many as 12 days. The Norse believed that each spark from the fire represented a new pig or calf that would be born during the coming year.

The end of December was a perfect time for celebration in most areas of Europe. At that time of year, most cattle were slaughtered so they would not have to be fed during the winter. For many, it was the only time of year when they had a supply of fresh meat. In addition, most wine and beer made during the year was finally fermented and ready for drinking.

In Germany, people honored the pagan god Oden during the mid-winter holiday. Germans were terrified of Oden, as they believed he made nocturnal flights through the sky to observe his people, and then decide who would prosper or perish. Because of his presence, many people chose to stay inside.

Saturnalia - In Rome, where winters were not as harsh as those in the far north, Saturnalia—a holiday in honor of Saturn, the god of agriculture—was celebrated. Beginning in the week leading up to the winter solstice and continuing for a full month, Saturnalia was a hedonistic time, when food and drink were plentiful and the normal Roman social order was turned upside down. For a month, slaves would become masters. Peasants were in command of the city. Business and schools were closed so that everyone could join in the fun.

Also around the time of the winter solstice, Romans observed Juvenalia, a feast honoring the children of Rome. In addition, members of the upper classes often celebrated the birthday of Mithra, the god of the unconquerable sun, on December 25. It was believed that Mithra, an infant god, was born of a rock. For some Romans, Mithra’s birthday was the most sacred day of the year. In the early years of Christianity, Easter was the main holiday; the birth of Jesus was not celebrated.
 
unless you count places like Asia, Africa and South America......when you come right down to it, the only place religion is fading is Western Europe......

You are, as you well know, wrong. However we could make it right by simply changing the word religion to superstition. There are populations where there is little sign of religion fading, The Philipines for example. Even Muslim societies are seeing their youth questioning their teaching.
One symptom of this is the rabid fundementalism, both Islamic and Christian.
How a nation so bent on violence, arrogance and selfishness and on denying proper health care to its people ever call themselves religious, is beyond me. Evidence, of course, of a poorly educated, frightened and gullible people.
 
You are, as you well know, wrong. However we could make it right by simply changing the word religion to superstition. There are populations where there is little sign of religion fading, The Philipines for example. Even Muslim societies are seeing their youth questioning their teaching.
One symptom of this is the rabid fundementalism, both Islamic and Christian.
How a nation so bent on violence, arrogance and selfishness and on denying proper health care to its people ever call themselves religious, is beyond me. Evidence, of course, of a poorly educated, frightened and gullible people.

Amen brother!
 
look dimwit.....nobody is denying that the secular tradition of "Christmas" comes from earlier traditions......I simply pointed out in my first post that it was wrong to claim that what the Christians celebrate on the 25th was borrowed from the pagans......its not my fault he was stupid enough to try to argue that point......

And again your observation is wrong. Christians DO in fact celebrate the pagan rituals. What ritual is uniquely Christian other than holding mass? The majority of Christians probably don't bother with that.

What Christians call Christmas is almost entirely based on pagan rituals.
 
What historical, anecdotal and eye witness evidence?

I tend to believe that some character known as Christ existed, but there is no hard evidence. The Gospels were written 30-35 after his death. Josephus wrote of him 65-70 years after his death and some of that is questioned by historians.

josephus is the historical. history is always questioned, nonetheless, there exists mention of jesus outside of the bible.

anecdotal and eye witness are of course 3 of the 4 gospels.
 
and as I said before.....to claim that what Christians celebrate on Christmas is borrowed from the pagans is simply stupid......fortunately, your source is smarter than you....

i don't know how many times i need to make myself clear on this, but you clearly are not understanding what i'm saying. so here it is again:

and where did christmas from....yuletide and other rituals, they merely adopted pagen rituals, slapped on some christian stuff, wrapped it up in a nice bow and called it christmas. this way the pagens would not be offended and would not see a big difference in celebrating christmas. to claim that christmas is purely a christian holiday is naive in the extreme.

- i never said 'everything' christians celebrate christmas for was adopted from pagans. they took an already popular pagan holiday, some pagen rituals, and turned it into a christian holiday by adding the remembrance of christ's birth. quoting the source that there was nothing intrinsically christian about saturnalia................does not..............mean there is nothing intrinsically pagan about christmas.
 
And the gospels disagree to some extent on key things.

i wouldn't say disagreement and i definitely wouldn't say "key" things. if they all said exactly the same thing, you would claim they would made up and that they each agreed on the same story. the fact they differ actually lends more credibility to the accounts.
 
And how many were written by the same guy as best as the scholors can figure out?

the last book was written by a crazy guy in prison.
 
josephus is the historical. history is always questioned, nonetheless, there exists mention of jesus outside of the bible.

anecdotal and eye witness are of course 3 of the 4 gospels.

Josephus' account amounts to a couple sentences and he was not a contemporary.

It is not that the history is questioned but the source.

The gospels are not believed to be eye witness acounts. Just because they carry the name of an apostle does nit mean they were written by one.
 
I was thinking today about the disconnect of idiot conservatives that complain about the commercialization/secularization of Christmas while they villify workers that objected to working on Thanksgiving. The cognitive dissonance of conservative thought even leaves many of them so ditzy they don't know they are believers.
 
Last edited:
Josephus' account amounts to a couple sentences and he was not a contemporary.

It is not that the history is questioned but the source.

The gospels are not believed to be eye witness acounts. Just because they carry the name of an apostle does nit mean they were written by one.

actually, it is believed that 3 of 4 were written by the eye witness. some of course do not. but to simply claim they are not believed is not accurate.

doesn't matter if it is only a couple of sentences, he wrote about the man, jesus. you can question the source all you like, but the fact remains, he was mentioned in a secular setting.
 
actually, it is believed that 3 of 4 were written by the eye witness. some of course do not. but to simply claim they are not believed is not accurate.

doesn't matter if it is only a couple of sentences, he wrote about the man, jesus. you can question the source all you like, but the fact remains, he was mentioned in a secular setting.

By who, is it believed they were written by the eye witness?

You are not understanding and becoming defensive.

Josephus was not a cotemporary of Christ. He wrote about someome else's account of Christ. He did not provide any support for his existence. Further, it is disputed whether the brief mention came from him or was inserted after the fact by the church.
 
Back
Top