Same-sex couples begin marrying

I don't care if you like the answer or not, but it was still an answer.

Your turn to answer now, actually long overdo.
you keep trying to get me to talk dirty with you, Ive already told you I have no intention of doing so. This forum is about discussing politics, go to a gay sex chat for what you are seeking.
 
you keep trying to get me to talk dirty with you, Ive already told you I have no intention of doing so. This forum is about discussing politics, go to a gay sex chat for what you are seeking.
You already opened the door. And as I said earlier, this proves your instability, which is directly responsible for your political positions.
 
Sol, I'm sure I've answered your question long ago. A one-man, one-woman married couple is the best way to raise children, and therefore not just a benefit but vital for a civilized society. Any other alternative arrangement is simply less desirable.

I was once told by a much younger college that she did not intend to get married, but she wanted children and so would raise them herself. I knew both her parents, and told her that I was quite sure that she had received substantial benefits in the form of examples and advice from not just her mother but her father as well. Then I asked her why would she intentionally give her own children such a distinct disadvantage when she had a boyfriend willing to give her children, marry her as well as help raise them?

She had never been confronted like that and couldn't think of anything at all to counter the point. A year later she got married.
 
James chapter 1

12 Blessed is the man who endures temptation; for when he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him. 13 Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires and enticed. 15 Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death.

lead me not into temptation...i can find it all by myself

oh well
 
Sol, I'm sure I've answered your question long ago. A one-man, one-woman married couple is the best way to raise children, and therefore not just a benefit but vital for a civilized society. Any other alternative arrangement is simply less desirable.

I was once told by a much younger college that she did not intend to get married, but she wanted children and so would raise them herself. I knew both her parents, and told her that I was quite sure that she had received substantial benefits in the form of examples and advice from not just her mother but her father as well. Then I asked her why would she intentionally give her own children such a distinct disadvantage when she had a boyfriend willing to give her children, marry her as well as help raise them?

She had never been confronted like that and couldn't think of anything at all to counter the point. A year later she got married.

What evidence do you have about what is the best way to raise children?
 
So I get an email.


Since you're an ignorant young man with little worldly experience you don't understand that people change. They evolve. Their opinions change.

When I was your age I was a conservative military man. Look at me now.

See ya in thirty years at the tea room.
 
Since you're an ignorant young man with little worldly experience you don't understand that people change. They evolve. Their opinions change.

When I was your age I was a conservative military man. Look at me now.

See ya in thirty years at the tea room.

Yes look at the sexually deviant you are, so when your partner is done humpin your hiney do to lick the crap off his dick?, because their is a lot of bacteria in human excrement, wouldn't want you to catch cold.
 
My actual position:A one-man, one-woman married couple is the best way to raise children, and therefore not just a benefit but vital for a civilized society. Any other alternative arrangement is simply less desirable.

Less desireable for whom? For straight conservatives who think using the logical fallacy of Appeal to Tradition is acceptable?

It is certainly not acceptable for kids who will not have two parents at all, because your antiquated ideas will not allow their two parents to marry.

It is certainly not desireable based on studies that showed no negative effects on most kids raised by gay couples.

It appears it is less desireable because of a few religious fundamentalists, and because of some "Ick Factor" in which you feel allowing gay marriage would increase the number of gay people.
 
"The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position." http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html

"Appeal to Tradition is a fallacy that occurs when it is assumed that something is better or correct simply because it is older, traditional, or "always has been done." "

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-tradition.html


Yeah, I was sarcastic in my reply because you have offered nothing more than a claim to have 5000 years of history as proof.

The simple fact is that you have no evidence that a gay couple is less desireable.
 
Back
Top