What that crazy moonbat Palin is saying today!

[Jarod]

I am from Birmingham, but I lived in Montgomery for a while. Very familiar with Old Cloverdale, almost bought a house there.



Again, what you and the left are attempting to do, is convince people you're only talking about strong communities, and no one in their right mind is opposed to strong communities, never have been. I get the trick! I'm not opposed to you sending your kids to Synagogues or Churches, or to summer camps. I have never suggested we do away with these programs or aspects of the village. But that's NOT WHAT THE MOONBAT ON MSNBC WAS TALKING ABOUT! Why in logics name, would she have to tell us what we need, if it's stuff that you admit is already happening? Is she saying we need more Christian summer camps or Vacation Bible Schools? I didn't hear that. Is she saying Jewish Synagogues and Buddhist Monasteries should be funded and endorsed by the government so we can have more of them, helping the village? Nope... she didn't say that either. My guess is, if Sarah Palin came up with such an idea, you'd all be ready to burn her at the stake for it.



It doesn't matter why. The argument presented, was that Sarah Palin is sucking all the oxygen out of the room, and other conservative women can't find the spotlight because of her. But she wasn't even a speaker at the convention, while I named off a list of fine conservative women who were. So how is she stealing their spotlight? What else could the RNC do to take the spotlight off Palin, besides not invite her to speak? Should they have had someone to get up there and bash Sarah? Seems like the RNC did everything short of that, to avoid giving Palin any attention at all, but Rana says she is stealing the spotlight, I don't see it.

You are assuming what the MSNBC person was saying. Just as Palin was suggesting you do.

 

[Jarod]

Lovely! Then let's enact Bush's Faith-based Initiatives idea, so Churches and Synagogues can have a stronger influence on young people? You're all for that, right? After all, what better source for the village help than those committed to helping others through their faith? Of course you won't have a problem with this, because you realize the tremendous importance of community, and how it takes a village!

And while we're at it, let's tackle this problem where 70% of black children are born into families with no father around. Maybe the Churches in the Village can offer some guidance there as well? Maybe they can begin to instill some moral values in society? You're all for that, right? Of course you are! You said as much! That's what this is ALL ABOUT!

So you belive that the Government shall make laws that would respect the establishment of religen.

 

[Phantasmal]

So you belive that the Government shall make laws that would respect the establishment of religen.

Dixie has his own brand of the Taliban!

 

[zappasguitar]

Well, team dinosaur didn't ask you, did they? Neither did team genius or team pothead. Yes.... it's an "outdated" belief that parents are responsible for raising their children. That's what the thread is about, not how good her daughter dances, or whether honey boo boo should be SoS. Let's stick to the meat of the topic, and not wander off into whateverness?

Palin is wacky and out of touch, because she believes things like, parents are responsible for raising their children, and the children do not belong to the government. That's the kind of dinosaur thinking we need to rid ourselves of, according to Libs.


You know, I was thinking that Sarah Palin probably wouldn't be a very good choice for president, maybe she's just not worthy of the office, perhaps all the ridicule and complaint has merit, and she lacks the depth to pull it off.... but the more I read stupidity like what you posted, the more I start to think... why the fuck not? Let's ELECT Sarah President, and let her prove you wrong? It would be worth electing her, just to watch your pinhead explode! And hey... after the Moron who's currently in the office, there isn't much more "damage" Palin could do. Fuck it... give her a shot, I say!

Agreed. And idiots like the pseudo libertarian mods on this site just don't get it. Maybe one day they will grow up and realize there is more to life than puffing away on their bong

You sure wrote a whole lot in response to me talking about pot. Did you even read what I wrote or did you run out of Imodium and now have a severe case of diarrhea of the keyboard? Fucking douche nozzle

Ahhh but you weren't just talking about pot...but hey, what's one more lie from a guy who wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on the ass.

See the bold portion, that's you agreeing with Dixie and continuing to put forth the lie he's been spreading about Melissa Harris-Perry and the comments she made.

So let's clarify once again, NO...it doesn't look at all like you were talking ONLY about pot...of course this is the spot where you'll respond by claiming you never said you were talking "only" about pot

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

You are assuming what the MSNBC person was saying. Just as Palin was suggesting you do.

Well, people do often make assumptions based on logic. I admit that.

We can presume she didn't mean we need Synagogues and Churches to provide community outreach programs, because they already do that. We can't assume that she meant we should do more of this or fund it at the Federal level, because it flies in the face of what every godless liberal socialist has ever supported or advocated, and have been staunchly opposed to in the past.

SO you tell me what she meant? She said "we need to stop thinking of kids as our own, and start thinking of them as belonging to the community." Those are her words, and I take that to mean that she advocates community parenting, and assuming some kind of authority over traditional parenting. I'm with Palin on this, "Unflippingbelievable!"

 

[zappasguitar]

Do you think we are fools?

Why yes...as a matter of fact we do.

You are all fools.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

So you belive that the Government shall make laws that would respect the establishment of religen.

No, that's not what I said, I just agreed with your argument that we need "the village" to help raise our kids, and the churches are part of "the village" and you even admitted you find them beneficial in helping raise your children. We don't have to endorse anything, in order to let religious people freely exercise their religious beliefs, and provide outreach.

 

[zappasguitar]

What group is 'collective' code word for ?

A church group?

 

[maineman]

Lovely! Then let's enact Bush's Faith-based Initiatives idea, so Churches and Synagogues can have a stronger influence on young people? You're all for that, right? After all, what better source for the village help than those committed to helping others through their faith? Of course you won't have a problem with this, because you realize the tremendous importance of community, and how it takes a village!

And while we're at it, let's tackle this problem where 70% of black children are born into families with no father around. Maybe the Churches in the Village can offer some guidance there as well? Maybe they can begin to instill some moral values in society? You're all for that, right? Of course you are! You said as much! That's what this is ALL ABOUT!

As a former man of the cloth, I am all for the involvement of church based programs as part of the village's aproach to assisting in rearing the children of its citizenry. But I see churches and religious organizations as pieces of the puzzle, not the entirety of any possible solution. Wouldn't you agree? Schools, sports organizations, Big Brother/Big Sister programs, to name a few, also need to be a part of the solution as well, imho.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Why yes...as a matter of fact we do.

You are all fools.

I'll tell you what... whenever I see a bunch of you liberals send a couple bus loads of your degenerate punk kids up to Alaska to hunt caribou with Sarah Palin for the Summer, I will believe you are sincere about wanting to have the "community" more involved in our child rearing. You have NO such intentions, you don't give a shit about children, you don't give a shit about society. You want a godless liberal society, devoid of any morality judgements or personal responsibility. Your sudden curious interest in "wholesome community values" is fucking hilarious to me. You really must think we are all that stupid, there is no other rationale to explain it.

 

[Jarod]

No, that's not what I said, I just agreed with your argument that we need "the village" to help raise our kids, and the churches are part of "the village" and you even admitted you find them beneficial in helping raise your children. We don't have to endorse anything, in order to let religious people freely exercise their religious beliefs, and provide outreach.

If you are going to fund programs based on the requirement that they be "faith based", you are respecting the establishment of religen.

Dix, do you realize that things can exist even if they are not funded by government?

 

[maineman]

I'll tell you what... whenever I see a bunch of you liberals send a couple bus loads of your degenerate punk kids up to Alaska to hunt caribou with Sarah Palin for the Summer, I will believe you are sincere about wanting to have the "community" more involved in our child rearing. You have NO such intentions, you don't give a shit about children, you don't give a shit about society. You want a godless liberal society, devoid of any morality judgements or personal responsibility. Your sudden curious interest in "wholesome community values" is fucking hilarious to me. You really must think we are all that stupid, there is no other rationale to explain it.

Hunting caribou with Barbie is now your litmus test for wanting community involvement in the lives of our village's children? How about wanting to see a strong T-Ball and little league baseball program?

 

[Jarod]

Having your neighbors over for dinner is a good way to divelope community involbement in the lives of our villages children, so are T-Ball, and festivals.....

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

As a former man of the cloth, I am all for the involvement of church based programs as part of the village's aproach to assisting in rearing the children of its citizenry. But I see churches and religious organizations as pieces of the puzzle, not the entirety of any possible solution. Wouldn't you agree? Schools, sports organizations, Big Brother/Big Sister programs, to name a few, also need to be a part of the solution as well, imho.

Oh, there are all kinds of ways we can "help the community" but that's not what this is about. That's the SPIN! That's what you want to try and convince everyone is being talked about here, when it's just not. We can all agree, community outreach programs, regardless of who does them, are a positive thing. No one has been opposed to people helping their neighbors, we all pretty much agree this is a good thing and we should encourage it. That's why it's so fucking amazing to me, the left is trying to SPIN what was said, into some innocent plea for us to do what we've been doing and pretty much have always agreed with. Does that make sense to any retards out there? Fuck, Yurt is gone, he could probably rationalize why someone would make such an argument.

This is about Liberal Socialists, (of which you are one) assuming some level of presumed 'responsibility' for the raising of our children. It is so that they can begin, at an early age, to instill Liberal Socialist values in the children, much the same way as Mao did in China. You raise these little socialists up, pumped full of this socialist crap, and when they grow up to be adult socialists, they outnumber everyone else. This is actually one aspect of Socialism and Socialist theory that DOES work and IS effective. This is why it took so many years for China to recover economically.

Now you want stupid people out there to believe that she was only talking about "people helping people" but that simply is a lie. Because we already have people helping people and no one has ever been opposed to that. In fact, Bush proposed we allow faith-based organizations to use federal monies to help their communities, and liberals had a cow while standing on their ears. You can still to this day, mention "faith based initiatives" and their eyes glaze over, and before you know it, there they are, standing on their ear again, with a heifer's head poking out of their twats!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

If you are going to fund programs based on the requirement that they be "faith based", you are respecting the establishment of religen.

Dix, do you realize that things can exist even if they are not funded by government?

I didn't "require" anything be only "faith based." We already fund many programs that aren't faith based, I just want to include them. They ARE part of the village, right?

Yes I realize things can exist without government funding, was that what the MSNBC moonbat was talking about you reckon?

 

[Damocles]

My children do not "belong" to me though they are my responsibility and not that of the "community".

Children belong to themselves, like each of us do. They are the responsibility of the parents, not the "community" and it is our job to raise healthy and productive adults capable of taking responsibility for themselves, not to raise "children" ready to be owned by a government or a community (same thing).

Both of these people are wrong (Sarah and the idiot MSDNC reporter), Children don't "belong" to the parents or to the community, only slaves would "belong" to somebody, even a parent, or "the community".

 

[Howey]

A church group?

No, silly.


A "collective" is the voices in Dixie's head!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

My children do not "belong" to me though they are my responsibility and not that of the "community".

Children belong to themselves, like each of us do. They are the responsibility of the parents, not the "community" and it is our job to raise healthy and productive adults capable of taking responsibility for themselves, not to raise "children" ready to be owned by a government or a community (same thing).

Both of these people are wrong (Sarah and the idiot MSDNC reporter), Children don't "belong" to the parents or to the community, only slaves would "belong" to somebody, even a parent, or "the community".

Uhm... Sarah Palin has never said that children "belong" to their parents.

THIS is more along the lines of what Palin said:
My children do not "belong" to me though they are my responsibility and not that of the "community".

So you are a moonbat like Palin, eh, Damo?

 

[Howey]

My children do not "belong" to me though they are my responsibility and not that of the "community".

Children belong to themselves, like each of us do. They are the responsibility of the parents, not the "community" and it is our job to raise healthy and productive adults capable of taking responsibility for themselves, not to raise "children" ready to be owned by a government or a community (same thing).

Both of these people are wrong (Sarah and the idiot MSDNC reporter), Children don't "belong" to the parents or to the community, only slaves would "belong" to somebody, even a parent, or "the community".

Looks like, by definition, we all "belong" to the community, unless of course, we're antisocial schizo's like STY.

be·long verb \bi-ˈlȯŋ, bē-\

Definition of BELONG

intransitive verb
1
a : to be suitable, appropriate, or advantageous <a dictionary belongs in every home>
b : to be in a proper situation <a man of his ability belongs in teaching>
2
a : to be the property of a person or thing —used with to <the book belongs to me>
b : to be attached or bound by birth, allegiance, or dependency —usually used with to <they belong to their homeland>
c : to be a member of a club, organization, or set —usually used with to <she belongs to a country club>
3
: to be an attribute, part, adjunct, or function of a person or thing <nuts and bolts belong to a car>
4
: to be properly classified

 

[zappasguitar]

Well, people do often make assumptions based on logic. I admit that.

We can presume she didn't mean we need Synagogues and Churches to provide community outreach programs, because they already do that. We can't assume that she meant we should do more of this or fund it at the Federal level, because it flies in the face of what every godless liberal socialist has ever supported or advocated, and have been staunchly opposed to in the past.

SO you tell me what she meant? She said "we need to stop thinking of kids as our own, and start thinking of them as belonging to the community." Those are her words, and I take that to mean that she advocates community parenting, and assuming some kind of authority over traditional parenting. I'm with Palin on this, "Unflippingbelievable!"

ASSume anything you like...it only further cements your standing as the board ASS.

You ASSume what you want because it allows you to further demonize Liberals.