Obama, Asleep at the Switch?

Sudan offered to turn him over to the US and Clinton declined. He could have easily been charged for the bombings of two American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, a base in Saudi Arabia, the attack on the USS Cole, or the 1993 WTC attack. I would say this puts Osama in a bit of a different category than whatever nameless persons were implicated in the memo Bush received.

But this isn't about Clinton's failures, or Bush's... it's about Obama not being held to the same standard by liberals. You see, Obama is Liberal and Black, and by golly, if there is a such thing as reincarnation, I want to come back as a black liberal! Because you can apparently get away with anything, you can't be held accountable, can't be criticized, and never are responsible for your actions.

And the racist bullshit starts. Who has said Obama has done nothing wrong?

It just feels that way to you because guys like you want his head on a pike on a weekly basis because of some article you read on the blaze, something you heard on AM, or for you? Probably off of stormfront
 
Clinton didn't get that memo. Bush DID, and it's documented - and he did nothing about it. Except to say that his staff had "covered their asses."

We should rename this thread "The Bush apologism thread." Anytime you've got Dix AND bravs, it's a party.

You must have skipped this part, Thingy......

The first hijackers to arrive in the United States were Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, who settled in the San Diego area in January 2000.
followed by three hijacker-pilots, Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ziad Jarrah early in the summer of 2000
The fourth hijacker-pilot, Hani Hanjour, arrived in San Diego in December 2000.


Bush wasn't even president when the first hijackers came into the country in 2000.....and by the time he received this 'memo' you're so hot about....ALL THE HIJACKERS
WERE ALREADY IN COUNTRY......
and you also claim Clinton didn't get 'the memo'.....so you saying that Aug. 2001 was the first time anyone worried about AQ.....?.....thats not what Clinton claims....

Memo or no memo, Clinton says he was well aware of the threat....after all, he just had a US Navy ship bombed ....
yet
the first group of the wtc attackers came into the US in 2000.....January thru December, the ENTIRE YEAR, ... the hijackers were slipping through Clintons fingers...and
you have the balls to put all the blame on Bush because of a memo that came to him after the terrorists were already here, 3 weeks before the attack.....


you're a complete partisan asshole that just sucks up whatever your handlers tell you......you can't think for yourself...
 
Clinton didn't get that memo. Bush DID, and it's documented - and he did nothing about it. Except to say that his staff had "covered their asses."

We should rename this thread "The Bush apologism thread." Anytime you've got Dix AND bravs, it's a party.

What should Bush have done? Round up all suspicious looking young middle eastern men? Did the memo specify a crime that had been committed by someone? We can't arrest people without charging them, can we? Clinton got the same kinds of memos Bush got, but we didn't hear anything about it, because terrorists hadn't flown planes into buildings yet, and because we were busy watching Clinton do the Slick Willie around the latest Bimbo Eruption.

As for the thread, it would be nice if we could keep it confined to the topic at hand, and not try and turn it into a Bush/Iraq bashing thread like always. We should just rename about 90% of the threads at JPP... "Another Thread to Bash Bush In!"

I don't know why you keep repeating "covered your asses" ...was this something you saw in a Michael Moore documentary? Bush certainly never said such a thing in the context you keep presenting it, like a lying piece of dog shit. I know you think this is clever and cute, but it's really annoying more than anything.
 
You're high. We always love it when you bring up Bush. It proves you lying cowards have no where else to run.

Who gives a shit anymore? The only beef I have with Bush are the following...

1. He gave most favored nation status to China...which.
A. They didn't deserve because of their human rights record....and
B. Ushered in the massive job exodus that helped to fuck our economy.

2. Fought a war in two fronts AND cut taxes AND left those wars off the books to let the next president to deal with.

3. Bailed Wall Street out. Even though the American Public didn't want it, and Congress voted against it the first time around.... then he did his Billy Graham speech saying "if we don't give them $800B, we will all die(well...that last part was an exaggeration, but you get the idea)

That's about it. Other than those things, he wasn't that bad....no worse than any other.
 
And the racist bullshit starts. Who has said Obama has done nothing wrong?

It just feels that way to you because guys like you want his head on a pike on a weekly basis because of some article you read on the blaze, something you heard on AM, or for you? Probably off of stormfront

There was nothing "racist" about my comment. I rarely ever visit any other political site or blog. I may go read an article, if it's a subject of interest, but I am very leary about what websites I frequent. left OR right.

No one has suggested Obama's head on a pike. I merely made the argument many of you made for Bush & Co. back in the day, that Obama was apparently "asleep at the switch" while these Boston Bombers plotted their evil scheme. Bush had a memo... Obama had one of the two in custody, being questioned by the FBI for ties to radical Islam. If the standards for "asleep at the switch" apply in Bush's case, they certainly have to apply in Obama's as well, that's all I was saying.
 
There was nothing "racist" about my comment. I rarely ever visit any other political site or blog. I may go read an article, if it's a subject of interest, but I am very leary about what websites I frequent. left OR right.

No one has suggested Obama's head on a pike. I merely made the argument many of you made for Bush & Co. back in the day, that Obama was apparently "asleep at the switch" while these Boston Bombers plotted their evil scheme. Bush had a memo... Obama had one of the two in custody, being questioned by the FBI for ties to radical Islam. If the standards for "asleep at the switch" apply in Bush's case, they certainly have to apply in Obama's as well, that's all I was saying.

And what does that have to do with "black liberal"? STFU, David Duke.
 
Is there something racist about the term "black liberal" now? Is that some kind of dog whistle?

Yeah....especially when you assume that he gets special treatment because of it....just admit it dude...you have a prejudice. We all do to one extent or another.
 
Yeah....especially when you assume that he gets special treatment because of it....just admit it dude...you have a prejudice. We all do to one extent or another.

I have no prejudice toward Obama because he is black, none whatsoever. YOU fuckwits are the ones who are prejudiced. Every criticism that has ever been raised of this man, has been met with accusations of "racism" because he happens to be black, and you can exploit that characteristic for political gain. I have cast NO disparaging remarks on him for being black or being a black liberal, as I said, if there is reincarnation, I hope to come back as a black liberal myself! It's a pretty sweet fucking gig, you can do or say whatever you please, you don't have to account for your actions, you don't have to answer questions, you don't have to take responsibility, everything is someone else's fault, you can't be criticized, and white liberals will defend virtually anything you do.

Hell... being that Obama is only half black, I wonder if my 1/16 Creole heritage would "qualify" as black to liberals, I might just change stripes and become a black liberal!
 
I have no prejudice toward Obama because he is black, none whatsoever. YOU fuckwits are the ones who are prejudiced. Every criticism that has ever been raised of this man, has been met with accusations of "racism" because he happens to be black, and you can exploit that characteristic for political gain. I have cast NO disparaging remarks on him for being black or being a black liberal, as I said, if there is reincarnation, I hope to come back as a black liberal myself! It's a pretty sweet fucking gig, you can do or say whatever you please, you don't have to account for your actions, you don't have to answer questions, you don't have to take responsibility, everything is someone else's fault, you can't be criticized, and white liberals will defend virtually anything you do.

Hell... being that Obama is only half black, I wonder if my 1/16 Creole heritage would "qualify" as black to liberals, I might just change stripes and become a black liberal!

Then why did you bring it up? This is the only time I've brought up racism thus far....and your post deserved a mention
 
Hell... being that Obama is only half black, I wonder if my 1/16 Creole heritage would "qualify" as black to liberals, I might just change stripes and become a black liberal!


This is just getting better and better...

Indian....check

Black Dutch.....check

Japanese royalty....check

Creole.....check

And that's only 4/16ths!

I can't wait to hear the rest. Any guesses?
 
This is just getting better and better...

Indian....check

Black Dutch.....check

Japanese royalty....check

Creole.....check

And that's only 4/16ths!

I can't wait to hear the rest. Any guesses?

From the pictures, everyone knows you've got a little black in you; or should that be a "little black" in you. :)
 
:rolleyes: The point is that it's possible he didn't have a record or terrorist ties when the FBI vetted him two years ago, and got his terrorist marching orders last year instead.



If he was crazy enough that even the Russians requested that we check him out, he should have been on the top of any list to watch for the next 25 years.....
he and everyone that associated with him.....especially when he goes back to Russia for 6 months and we don't suspect anything about it ?

Haaah...somebody kinda dropped the ball here....there were enough red flags to see if you were looking....
 
You must have skipped this part, Thingy......

The first hijackers to arrive in the United States were Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, who settled in the San Diego area in January 2000.
followed by three hijacker-pilots, Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ziad Jarrah early in the summer of 2000
The fourth hijacker-pilot, Hani Hanjour, arrived in San Diego in December 2000.


Bush wasn't even president when the first hijackers came into the country in 2000.....and by the time he received this 'memo' you're so hot about....ALL THE HIJACKERS
WERE ALREADY IN COUNTRY......
and you also claim Clinton didn't get 'the memo'.....so you saying that Aug. 2001 was the first time anyone worried about AQ.....?.....thats not what Clinton claims....

Memo or no memo, Clinton says he was well aware of the threat....after all, he just had a US Navy ship bombed ....
yet
the first group of the wtc attackers came into the US in 2000.....January thru December, the ENTIRE YEAR, ... the hijackers were slipping through Clintons fingers...and
you have the balls to put all the blame on Bush because of a memo that came to him after the terrorists were already here, 3 weeks before the attack.....


you're a complete partisan asshole that just sucks up whatever your handlers tell you......you can't think for yourself...

Oh, gee- they were already in the country? How could they possibly be stopped or apprehended if they were already here?

What an excuse-maker you are. Bush dismissed the threat, and was casual about it. And it was over a month before the attacks.

It's great when you & Dixie get going on the Bush apologism.
 
Back
Top