Team Zimmerman, Broke

Darla said:
Are you going to say "welp I guess he's guility I agree with the jury's decision" if it goes the other way?
Click to expand...

fuck no. there is only one right answer for the jury to come back with and that is full acquittal.

but i'm not being like rana saying "welp, it's now up to the jury" while looking nobly to the heavens
 
DamnYankee said:
So riots can be justified?
Click to expand...

Apparently so, just depends on who's rioting. The race riots of Chicago in the 20's....the police rioting during peaceful marching
during the Civil Rights Movement, I'm sure would many whites would deem "justified". But you'd say a travesty of justice on behalf of minorities, resulting in rioting is not justified
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so it's no longer the rule of law or a justice system. you prefer mob lynching when it's color in reverse. got it.
Click to expand...
didn't say that at all, but do continue to twist my words. Where was the rule of law when hundreds if not thousands of black
men and boys, and even some women were either strung up and hung from a tree or set on fire and burned to death?
 
Grid said:
fuck no. there is only one right answer for the jury to come back with and that is full acquittal.

but i'm not being like rana saying "welp, it's now up to the jury" while looking nobly to the heavens
Click to expand...

True, you could never be as noble as I.
 
Professor Baxter said:
That's what Zimmerman said and may well have perceived. You are forming conjecture about Trayvon's thoughts and actions and you have absolutely no proof for it.
Click to expand...

You said I had no proof Zimmerman lost him. You said THAT was just conjecture. It is not. It is what was stated on the 911 call.
 
Superfreak said:
You said I had no proof Zimmerman lost him. You said THAT was just conjecture. It is not. It is what was stated on the 911 call.
Click to expand...

It's bad enough when you exaggerate now you are just lying. You said...

Superfreak said:
so this scared teenager who lost Zimmerman decided to go back and find Zimmerman instead of going on to the place he was staying?

Funny how racist people like yourself try to project your racist beliefs onto others.
Click to expand...

I said...

Professor Baxter said:
You have no proof that he went back or "lost" Zimmerman. It is nothing but conjecture.
Click to expand...

You and I were both talking about whether Martin lost Zimmerman, through his own eyes, not whether Zimmerman lost Martin. You are making up facts that you can not know and for which there is no evidence. It is conjecture.
 
poet said:
Apparently so, just depends on who's rioting. The race riots of Chicago in the 20's....the police rioting during peaceful marching
during the Civil Rights Movement, I'm sure would many whites would deem "justified". But you'd say a travesty of justice on behalf of minorities, resulting in rioting is not justified
Click to expand...
So if Zimmerman is innocent, riots are justified. Is this your position?
 
DamnYankee said:
Calm down you racist. Martin's race or that he was, as you stated, a "boy", is irrelevant. And "stalking" means that you are trailing someone going about legitimate business at their residence or on public property, not sneaking through backyards in someone else's neighborhood.
Click to expand...

I was referring to YOUR claim that "Justice was served" because Martin is dead. For all you know, his crime was walking while black.
 
Acknowledging that you don't know the whole truth does not establish a reasonable doubt. It is REASONABLE doubt. Not any possible doubt.

Zimmerman will have to create a reasonable doubt to establish a self defense defense. Certainly, he should have his opportunity. A wise jurist would always take the claims of the accused with a grain of salt and this is one we know is willing to commit perjury for much less. There are also several inconsistencies in his story and the evidence. By his actions, words and deeds so far I can't say I have a reasonable doubt, but I would want to give him an opportunity with competent defense.
 
poet said:
didn't say that at all, but do continue to twist my words. Where was the rule of law when hundreds if not thousands of black
men and boys, and even some women were either strung up and hung from a tree or set on fire and burned to death?
Click to expand...
there was no rule of law and I would have been fighting for them as well while being labeled an extremist nutbag, maybe even by you
 
DamnYankee said:
Calm down you racist. Martin's race or that he was, as you stated, a "boy", is irrelevant. And "stalking" means that you are trailing someone going about legitimate business at their residence or on public property, not sneaking through backyards in someone else's neighborhood.
Click to expand...

Martin was not sneaking through backyards in someone else's neighborhood. He was going about legitimate business.
 
Steelplate said:
I was referring to YOUR claim that "Justice was served" because Martin is dead. For all you know, his crime was walking while black.
Click to expand...
Justice was served because he was trying to kill Zimmerman. I'm not sure what "black" has to do with it, you racist.
 
poet said:
But, who, in their right mind, believes that he is innocent?
Martin is the one that is dead. Didn't you read my post? If Zimmerman is acquitted, I may riot.
Click to expand...
Many people, in their right minds, believe Zimmerman acted in self defense. "Dead" is what one gets when someone who is ready to defend themselves feels that their life is threatened.

Why the "may" riot? Why not decide now, and commit yourself. Start a web site.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top