Team Zimmerman, Broke

DamnYankee said:
What legitimate business would that be? Looking for his next spleef?

Or perhaps looking for something to steal to pay for it.
Click to expand...

Bump. This is one of your comments in this thread that brought about the charge of racism, which i already explained in this thread.
 
DamnYankee said:
Calm down you racist. Martin's race or that he was, as you stated, a "boy", is irrelevant. And "stalking" means that you are trailing someone going about legitimate business at their residence or on public property, not sneaking through backyards in someone else's neighborhood.
Click to expand...

Bump.
 
Incredibly lame response from you, PB. Yet I've made thousands of posts, and you have an advanced search engine at your disposal. Try again?
 
There is no proof that he was peeking into anyone's house or in anyone's backyard. He cut through an open space, which was common to do in the community and you will find similiar behavior is common in many such communities, and was walking through a common area.

The intent of your use of spleef (sic) is pretty clear.

You are race baiting.
 
I'm not arguing the Zimmy case here, PB. And a case could be made likewise that you're the one doing the race baiting.

Come on man, is that all you got? Over 13,000 posts of mine at your disposal and the best you can come up with is some bullshit about "baiting" because I used the word "spleef"? We called pot all kinds of words in college: spleef, joint, roach, bone.... Are there specific terms listed that can be used by white folks?

I patiently await your grovelling public apology to me in the "calling out" thread.
 
DamnYankee said:
Incredibly lame response from you, PB. Yet I've made thousands of posts, and you have an advanced search engine at your disposal. Try again?
Click to expand...

Explain your repeated, unfounded accusation of racism.
Click to expand...

No need to search any further. This is it, dumbass. This is the reason I called you a racist. You can certainly argue that I do not have sufficient support to validate the assertions, but it is my support for the accusation and in order to move the discussion forward you must necessarily take my word for that. You can either challenge my support or ignore it. Whatever... just stfu or move forward.

The other quote in your warzone thread is based on my opinion that you and ila sound a lot alike, which you clearly picked up on.
 
Professor Baxter said:
No need to search any further. This is it, dumbass. This is the reason I called you a racist. You can certainly argue that I do not have sufficient support to validate the assertions, but it is my support for the accusation and in order to move the discussion forward you must necessarily take my word for that. You can either challenge my support or ignore it. Whatever... just stfu or move forward.

The other quote in your warzone thread is based on my opinion that you and ila sound a lot alike, which you clearly picked up on.
Click to expand...

OK professor maineman
 
DamnYankee said:
I'm not arguing the Zimmy case here, PB. And a case could be made likewise that you're the one doing the race baiting.

Come on man, is that all you got? Over 13,000 posts of mine at your disposal and the best you can come up with is some bullshit about "baiting" because I used the word "spleef"? We called pot all kinds of words in college: spleef, joint, roach, bone.... Are there specific terms listed that can be used by white folks?

I patiently await your grovelling public apology to me in the "calling out" thread.
Click to expand...

You ignored the other point. I primarily called you out on your continued repetition of the unfounded accusation that Martin was engaged in illegal acts, for which there is absolutely no support. Your spleef (chosen over joint or bone for pretty obvious reasons) comment, was part of it, but mostly a bad joke.

You won't be getting any apology. Maybe if you repent then I will see that deep down it was not in your heart or you can try the shortcut and record a tearful explanation of you "is what you is" for all of us.
 
Professor Baxter said:
No need to search any further. This is it, dumbass. This is the reason I called you a racist. You can certainly argue that I do not have sufficient support to validate the assertions, but it is my support for the accusation and in order to move the discussion forward you must necessarily take my word for that. You can either challenge my support or ignore it. Whatever... just stfu or move forward.

The other quote in your warzone thread is based on my opinion that you and ila sound a lot alike, which you clearly picked up on.
Click to expand...

So in actuality you have nothing, so sorry there is no moving forward. Now you level a second accusation that I and another poster are one in the same.

And yet you call me a "dumbass". Is the irony lost on you?

Your antics here support my long-held assertion, that liberals call conservatives racists because they have no facts and therefore wish to quash debate.
 
Professor Baxter said:
You ignored the other point. I primarily called you out on your continued repetition of the unfounded accusation that Martin was engaged in illegal acts, for which there is absolutely no support. Your spleef (chosen over joint or bone for pretty obvious reasons) comment, was part of it, but mostly a bad joke.

You won't be getting any apology. Maybe if you repent then I will see that deep down it was not in your heart or you can try the shortcut and record a tearful explanation of you "is what you is" for all of us.
Click to expand...

This is hilarious. Is "spleef" now a code-word? Are "bones" smoked by whites and "spleefs" at the exclusivity of blacks? Are blacks the only ones who commit crimes in your world, so that calling an individual out on criminal acts makes one a racist?

Your excuses get more pitiful with each post.

Again, I patiently await your heartfelt, tearful, and humiliating apology. I use the word "patient" because I know that you, as a lib, despise personal responsibility and accountability that are required before you would even consider manning up to admit you fucked up.
 
DamnYankee said:
So in actuality you have nothing, so sorry there is no moving forward.
Click to expand...

Yes, please stfu and quit your pathetic whining. It is not as if I am calling you a racist in every post or response. I probably won't again until you say something racist, again.
 
DamnYankee said:
This is hilarious. Is "spleef" now a code-word? Are "bones" smoked by whites and "spleefs" at the exclusivity of blacks? Are blacks the only ones who commit crimes in your world, so that calling an individual out on criminal acts makes one a racist?

Your excuses get more pitiful with each post.

Again, I patiently await your heartfelt, tearful, and humiliating apology. I use the word "patient" because I know that you, as a lib, despise personal responsibility and accountability that are required before you would even consider manning up to admit you fucked up.
Click to expand...

:palm:

I thought you did not want to move this forward?

You were race baiting by accusing him of criminal acts for which there was no proof. You were not calling him out on any facts. Not even Zimmerman's defense has made such claims.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Yes, please stfu and quit your pathetic whining. It is not as if I am calling you a racist in every post or response. I probably won't again until you say something racist, again.
Click to expand...

You see whining I see me holding your feet to the fire, making you explain your baseless allegation.
 
Professor Baxter said:
:palm:

I thought you did not want to move this forward?

You were race baiting by accusing him of criminal acts for which there was no proof. You were not calling him out on any facts. Not even Zimmerman's defense has made such claims.
Click to expand...

So accusing one of criminal acts is now racist? Explain to me how that works. Because with that standard just about anyone who sees or hears about a crime that happens to be committed by a black and speaks their opinion of it is a racist.

Or maybe the truth is that it is you who are the racist for assuming that only blacks commit crimes.
 
DamnYankee said:
So accusing one of criminal acts is now racist? Explain to me how that works. Because with that standard just about anyone who sees or hears about a crime that happens to be committed by a black and speaks their opinion of it is a racist.

Or maybe the truth is that it is you who are the racist for assuming that only blacks commit crimes.
Click to expand...

You saw or heard something that inspired you to accuse him of those criminal acts?

Where did I claim or assume that only blacks commit crimes? Obviously, I do not believe any such thing, based on this very thread and those on the same topic.

You had no basis to repeatedly accuse him of a crime and yet you whine incessantly about the fact that I accused you of racism.
 
Bullshit. My basis is the stories that I've read in the media. You choose to believe other stories, that Martin was a 13 year old angel faced kid. I, however, recognized him for the pos that he was, based on the photos in his phone of him smoking pot, glorifying guns....

That along with similar incidences in my own HOA controlled 'hood (which includes several black families), where teens from outside (who just happen to be white) come through the 'hood and steal shit and vandalize property.
 
DamnYankee said:
Bullshit. My basis is the stories that I've read in the media. You choose to believe other stories, that Martin was a 13 year old angel faced kid. I, however, recognized him for the pos that he was, based on the photos in his phone of him smoking pot, glorifying guns....

That along with similar incidences in my own HOA controlled 'hood (which includes several black families), where teens from outside (who just happen to be white) come through the 'hood and steal shit and vandalize property.
Click to expand...

What story implied he was engaged in criminal acts? Even as late as you were claiming this? I was challenging / refuting your claims on this and you continued to repeat it.

When did I ever say he was 13 at the time of the crime?
 
Stories that I read alleged that Martin was suspected in criminal activity. This is about you accusing me of racism, nothing more.
 
DamnYankee said:
Stories that I read alleged that Martin was suspected in criminal activity. This is about you accusing me of racism, nothing more.
Click to expand...

Which ones? They were current as of the time you made the accusations? You had not heard any rebuttal of those claims?

You are a liar.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top