U.N. Force to disarm America

Would you welcome a U.N. force to occupy the U.S.?

  • Yes- I would welcome a U.N. occupying force

    Votes: 3 23.1%

  • No- I would not welcome a U.N. occupying force

    Votes: 10 76.9%
  • Total voters
    13
Anti-Party said:
Ok political brain.

Say our passion to change our Government lead to 1 person shooting at the Government. Say the Government shoots 3 more who were shooting at them to protect that person. Math goes on and the people are shooting at Government. The Government decides to use it's force on it's people. The force kills many.

Then the UN decides the USA shouldn't be killing it's own people and there are MANY nations that attack us for trying to strong arm them for too long, and see this as a window to strong arm back......

I know most of you don't know about Foreign Policy but this is accurate. Or maybe you can explain our moves to help rebels in other Countries and even bombing leaders that were never proven guilty.

Russia and the UN decide that we shouldn't be killing our Citizens.
Click to expand...

Another dimwitted leftist who thinks AmeriKa is already a third world country; not to worry, once Obama's term ends we can get back to being first world again. Obama's desperate attempt to drag us down to third world status has been noted however.

:rolleyes:

P.S. US troops will not fire on their own families and citizens; that is the most moronic assumption one can imagine but par for someone who is epically stupid.
 
I'm surprised the sob sisters of JPP aren't decrying this, seeing as how UN Personnel have been involved in numerous rapes over the years.
 
Watermark the Red said:
Why do you think American aggression against Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam went unpunished?
Click to expand...

So you don't think Iraq was run by a megalomaniac who was aggressively threatening his neighbors and our allies?

You think the Taliban were not run by Islamic thugs who gave comfort to Al Qaeda before and after 9-11?

You think the Communist Vietcong dictatorship was not aggressive in forcing its Southern neighbor into capitulation before and after it has signed a treaty with them?

It's official; you really are THAT stupid. But then you are a Communist sympathizer; they don't have a brain. They are trained little monkeys parroting the party line.

You're not JUST a moron, but a repugnantly ignorant one.
 
AssHatZombie said:
So the ultimate justice would be for the table to turn and for the U.N. to occupy america then?
Click to expand...

How could the UN occupy anything? Because you are a dimwit, you cannot possibly know that the only enforcement mechanism the feckless UN has is using the US military.

Europe and Asia have basically demobilized their militaries and stripped them down to pay for the Socialist nirvana. They don't have the might or the money to fight anything except to argue pointlessly and forever in the UN among themselves.

You really are THAT stupid.
 
Truth Detector said:
Anyone making such a claim or thanking this post needs a brain enema. Just plain stupid and ignorant; but that is par for Communists.
Click to expand...

If an individual had an unconditional veto over the decision of any judge or jury in the nation, how would they still effectively be bound by the law? Application of international law is subject to the arbitrary caprice of America, no claim can be pressed against America because they'll just veto it! International law doesn't apply to America. You're a naive dumbass if you think otherwise.
 
Watermark the Red said:
If an individual had an unconditional veto over the decision of any judge or jury in the nation, how would they still effectively be bound by the law? Application of international law is subject to the arbitrary caprice of America, no claim can be pressed against America because they'll just veto it! International law doesn't apply to America. You're a naive dumbass if you think otherwise.
Click to expand...

You're just a dumbass. Do you even know what this moronic gobbledygook you just typed means? No, you talk through your ass with your moronic nonsense so that you can remove all doubt what a small minded nitwit you really are.

You don’t think which is why you’re a Communist loving repugnant dumbass and you think AmeriKa is the problem which illustrates you have zero intelligence or factual historical knowledge.

Again, you're a repugnant dumbass. Spare me more of your goofy diarrhea.
 
Watermark the Red said:
Truth detector should be stripped of American citizenship and deported to Somalia. Fascists like this are unworthy of American citizenship.
Click to expand...

Not only are you a repugnant ignoramus; but you don't have a clue what Fascist is. But you’re a Communist dimwit; and Communist dimwits have no brains. They are little monkeys who are programmed to spew brain dead propaganda.

Yes, you really are that stupid and a repugnant dumbass.
 
Watermark the Red said:
Communism has a proud history, and one day the red flag will fly over this great land.
Click to expand...

Wrong again repugnant dumbass; Communism has a repugnant despotic history of failure, murder and mayhem that only brain dead little monkeys like you can proudly align yourself with.

The red flag will never fly over this great nation because even the dumbest American can comprehend what a repugnant ideology Communism is. But alas, you're a brain dead programmed little monkey; how could you even begin to comprehend things like reality, the facts or the truth.

Run along little repugnant monkey; your ideologues have some new talking points for you to parrot.

Yes, you really are THAT repugnant and THAT stupid.
 
annata said:
add in Libya. (regime change)

I think the UN gave some kind of cover, some resolution,, not that it matters to the US
Click to expand...

So you don't think Kaddafi was a megalomaniac dictator that funded global terrorism and murdered his own?

Don't get me wrong; I didn't support the Nato efforts to assist the terrorists now in charge. But to pretend this was an American issue is moronic, stupid and dimwitted at best.

Dimwit.
 
I havent read the thread yet but it would never happen.

The gun-owners and anyone else who objected would just destroy the economy first. It wouldnt be worth it.

And it wouldnt take guns to do it...blow up some bridges near the cities, plant a few domestic terror bombs in malls, and the entire already-weakened economy would finish its swirl down the toilet.

It wouldnt take much....scare folks a little and they'll just stop going out and shopping. And wont be able to get to work or transport goods in big metro areas. People will be afraid to drive over a bridge.

That's why it's also silly when people say, "oh, you dont need an assault rifle....the govt has tanks and granades! Do you want those too?" Nope, dont need 'em. Just need 'em to protect ourselves while the country goes down the crapper. See: Argentina.
 
Truth Detector said:
So you don't think Kaddafi was a megalomaniac dictator that funded global terrorism and murdered his own?

Don't get me wrong; I didn't support the Nato efforts to assist the terrorists now in charge. But to pretend this was an American issue is moronic, stupid and dimwitted at best.

Dimwit.
Click to expand...
no you dimwit..lol.. the UN did the authorization for no fly zone -the US decided to assassinate Qaddafi -regime change, and assassination is supposed to be against our "American Values" ..lol... (not that we have any)..

Look at Libya today; warlord, militia rule, Abu Anas living out in the open... we created a terrorist state. deal with ait..Bengazi...oh and BTW Obam shook Qaddafis hand at the 2009 G-8

gaddafi-obama.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top