sort of like when you claim your arguments are rational?......
Your attempts to be clever make me wince. Please stop.
sort of like when you claim your arguments are rational?......
one might actually say that if its been falsified, it isn't actually a supernatural event......thus the only events which ARE supernatural are those that can't be falsified.....
You are trying to act Christian with this argument.
I know that there are human remains that date long before Adam and Eve.
The Irony is that today, the non-Christians seem to be making the positive difference in society.
Tell me about this Falsified term you speak of.
. Why the fuck would someone need a deity to make a difference in society?sad if true, even sadder if it's false and you think its true.....
. Why the fuck would someone need a deity to make a difference in society?
Your attempts to be clever make me wince. Please stop.
Exactly. I would like to know if some of the posters here were taught the outrageously rude behavior as part of their churches evangelistic outreach. Really now....would these people act like this if the person they sit next to in Sunday school was looking over there shoulders while they were posting...?I was raised in a religion and have doubts all the time. Especially after reading some of the stuff here.
???....is that supposed to be pertinent to the conversation?......if so, you've fucked up again.....
So your intellectually conceding the point in post 622 that non Christians are often doing the good in society and that there is nothing wrong with that....THANKS!
Exactly. I would like to know if some of the posters here were taught the outrageously rude behavior as part of their churches evangelistic outreach. Really now....would these people act like this if the person they sit next to in Sunday school was looking over there shoulders while they were posting...?
so your defense is, you get a free pass on rudeness because you don't go to church?......
He could believe whatever he wanted as long as it didn't bias his work.
It's not that Intelligent Design Creationism shouldn't be taught as a science it's that it can't be taught as a science. Literally. How can you teach something as science when you can't apply the scientific method to it?Intelligent design shouldn't be taught as a science.
That doesn't make them scientifically valid ideas.Ideas exist outside of your personal definitions.
No we cannot use science to disprove a supernatural explanation. again, don't believe me? Go ahead and try it!We CAN use science to disprove a supernatural explanation because we can use science to explain that some phenomena has a natural explanation. Your statements are contradictory. For instance, James Randi proved the claims of supernatural causation/explanation by Uri Geller and other psychics to be false by simply showing how they could be achieved naturally and setting up tests that falsified their abilities. We could have tested Oral Roberts claims of a supernatural healing power. It's only when they fail to make falsifiable claims that the supernatural cannot be disproven.
Yes. That the chicken I just ate was delicious.Oookay. Does staring at chicken bones tell you things that science does not?
or maybe when the scientifically illiterate don't know what the ground rules of science are?When free thinkers question.