Subject of "All Up In My Snatch" thinks The Hildebeast is swell

maineman said:
your opinion bravs.... I certainly am not surprised that you would attack a military hero simply because he doesn't hate democrats as virulently as you do.
Click to expand...

I attacked him ?.....Really ?....where ?

I stated no opinion about him, only Obama...Obama pulled him out of Afghanistan in short order, I surmise it was because he thought he made a less than satisfactory choice,
THAT is my opinion about Obama's actions.........and his resignation from the DCI was under the cloud of a scandal....just the plain truth is hardly an attack on the man or his service to the country...

Either you can't comprehend what you read, or
Facts are hard for you to accept.
 
NOVA said:
I attacked him ?.....Really ?....where ?

I stated no opinion about him, only Obama...Obama pulled him out of Afghanistan in short order, I surmise it was because he thought he made a less than satisfactory choice,
THAT is my opinion about Obama's actions.........and his resignation from the DCI was under the cloud of a scandal....just the plain truth is hardly an attack the man or his service to the country...

Either you can't comprehend what you read, or
Facts are hard for you to accept.
Click to expand...

given his history of heroism and leadership, do you value his opinion?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
neither do you. you ARE effective at helping an established side take this country somewhere though, so congrats.
Click to expand...

I take a very active role... I am in constant email communication with fellow democrats in Maine and in Illinois and share my thoughts with them always... that's what we can do.... that, and stuff envelopes and knock on doors and give voters rides to the polls and help informed people vote absentee... and I did all those things for years and years before retiring.

and we can put our money where our beliefs are... I contribute extensively to democratic candidates and to liberal PACs.
 
Big Money said:
Vague. You said she was effective. Why can't you name specific accomplishments, Commander?
Click to expand...

can't or won't? I won't because discussing Clinton's qualifications and accomplishments with someone who continues to refer to her as "The Hildebeast" seems like a huge waste of my time. Sorry.
 
maineman said:
given his history of heroism and leadership, do you value his opinion?
Click to expand...

I give everyone's opinion the value I think it merits and deserves. As a military officer in wartime, I would give his opinions on military operations considerably more weight than, say...Obama's opinions, or my own, or yours. On personal matters, considering his own adventures, considerably less than my own opinion. Get the picture?....like your opinions on
political matters would get just about zero consideration from me......so there is not a 'yes or no' answer to your question.
 
maineman said:
I take a very active role... I am in constant email communication with fellow democrats in Maine and in Illinois and share my thoughts with them always... that's what we can do.... that, and stuff envelopes and knock on doors and give voters rides to the polls and help informed people vote absentee... and I did all those things for years and years before retiring.

and we can put our money where our beliefs are... I contribute extensively to democratic candidates and to liberal PACs.
Click to expand...

you take a very active role in letting people lie to you about what they plan to do, then turn a blind eye to what they do, all while paying them to do it.
 
NOVA said:
You make it so obvious when you have no ammunition to debate with.
Click to expand...

False dichotomy.
Click to expand...

STY: "who's a better American, someone who stands on principle or someone who has no spine?"

Explain how these are the only two ways to describe a "better American."

Circular argument.
Click to expand...

STY: "so incompetence and mistruths are qualifications for Democrats?"

CF: "Incompetence and mistruths as defined by whom? Conservatives?"

Bravs: "Incompetence ?.....[1]the dead bodies in Benghazi proves the first, and [2]the truth proves the other."

[1]The dead bodies don't automatically prove incompetence.

[2]Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.[SUP][2][/SUP] The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. However, the argument is useless because the conclusion is one of the premises. Circular logic cannot prove a conclusion because, if the conclusion is doubted, the premise which leads to it will also be doubted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top