"The obvious" being a lack of corroboration for a claim...![]()
So you say, BM.
"The obvious" being a lack of corroboration for a claim...![]()
I'm stating that feminists like yourself conveniently toss feminists like her for political expediency, and your defense of BJ Clinton proves that.Are you suggesting Lewinsky was lying about herself?

Let the record state that Jarod considers his opinion as justification for his opinion.Its the underlying belief of Randall Paul made clear by his comments about Monica Lewinsky being a victim of Bill Clinton.
I'm stating that feminists like yourself conveniently toss feminists like her for political expediency, and your defense of BJ Clinton proves that.![]()
Let the record also show that Christiekins of Pittsburgh denies knowing who Nina Burleigh is...![]()
Your fantasy of being a lawyer is entertaining to me!Let the record also show that Christiekins of Pittsburgh denies knowing who Nina Burleigh is...![]()
Now I do, I googled her. What was the relevance again?
Was it this?
Did I say I'm an attorney, Counselor?
I do? Cite.
Bill Clinton is not the victim, as I have already said, there is no victim here except possibly Hillary Clinton.
Good point!Chelsea
Like the Woody Allen thing?![]()
Is their some connection?
Her career has thrived because of her parents notoriety, so no.Chelsea
Again, your own post 63, where you defend Clinton by claiming that Lewinsky did not consider him a sexual predator.Again, cite my defense of Clinton or admit you're a big fat liar.
Her career has thrived because of her parents notoriety, so no.
Again, your own post 63, where you defend Clinton by claiming that Lewinsky did not consider him a sexual predator.
How should I know, Counselor?
You posted your opinion that the frogs' statement that Chelsea Clinton is a victim was a good point, didn't you?
Her career has thrived because of her parents notoriety, so no.