ITs happening again...!

Again... yet she called me out and stated I was exaggerating... then when I proved her wrong, she tried to blame the media. If you don't see how fucking stupid that is... then you are in the same boat as her. MY ENTIRE POINT IS THAT YOU, RANA AND SO MANY OTHER LIBERALS ARE SO QUICK TO BELIEVE WHATEVER THE MEDIA TELLS YOU. STOP IT. Learn to think for yourselves. Learn to wait for facts to actually come out. If they state something that is so very easy to fact check... CHECK IT OUT before you start telling others they are wrong.

For fucks sake you people are lemmings.

You should have seen Rachael Madcow when she found out about the Planned Part.hood building being near the CA shooting....she got so wet she was sliding off
her seat....then they said the shooting was at some gov. building, the speculation said it might be a white supremacist group attacking the gov....that gave
her an actual orgasm.......then her head exploded when the facts proved it was Muslim terrorism....
 
Again... yet she called me out and stated I was exaggerating... then when I proved her wrong, she tried to blame the media. If you don't see how fucking stupid that is... then you are in the same boat as her. MY ENTIRE POINT IS THAT YOU, RANA AND SO MANY OTHER LIBERALS ARE SO QUICK TO BELIEVE WHATEVER THE MEDIA TELLS YOU. STOP IT. Learn to think for yourselves. Learn to wait for facts to actually come out. If they state something that is so very easy to fact check... CHECK IT OUT before you start telling others they are wrong.

For fucks sake you people are lemmings.

:D Are you so OUT OF THE LOOP you've forgotten how this FORUM thing works? We all posted on San Bernardino in REAL TIME and corrected our INFO as it was REPORTED. You HAVE NOT called out any CONS who also jumped in with THEIR OPINIONS.

This was NO DIFFERENT from the way we've posted on ELECTION DAYS or DEBATE nights. Get over yourself, YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS OF THIS BOARD! :rofl2:
 
You should have seen Rachael Madcow when she found out about the Planned Part.hood building being near the CA shooting....she got so wet she was sliding off
her seat....then they said the shooting was at some gov. building, the speculation said it might be a white supremacist group attacking the gov....that gave
her an actual orgasm.......then her head exploded when the facts proved it was Muslim terrorism....

Your wetness is because your depends are full! Get your home care provider to change them!
 
2. Police using computers
More police officers on the beat

Additional manpower helps police departments respond to and prevent violence. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed a major crime bill that set aside enough federal funding for law enforcement agencies nationally to add 100,000 officers, though the ranks of the country's police forces had already been expanding as local governments dedicated more resources to their departments to control increasing rates of crime.
It wasn't just that police departments hired more people. They also started using computers to collect data on crime and to direct their officers' efforts more efficiently. When they have accurate, current information on where crime is happening, they can identify the neighborhoods where they are needed most.

As Zimring notes, police in New York were among the first to realize the potential for computers to aid in fighting crime. Departments nationwide are now using versions of New York's CompStat system, short for Comparative Statistics. A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice suggests that similar systems across the country reduced homicide by about 11 percent.

3. Less booze

A gradual decline in the amount of alcohol that Americans drink is another explanation for the decline in violence. About four in 10 prisoners convicted of murder were using alcohol at the time of the offense, according to a federal report. Americans drank 21 percent less alcohol in 2000 than in 1980, though consumption has increased since then, data from the National Institutes of Health shows. The authors of the report from the Brennan Center believe that this decline can account for 5 percent to 10 percent of the overall decline in crime.


Total U.S. alcohol consumption per person declined sharply beginning three decades ago, but has recently increased. (National Institutes of Health)

4. Less lead

Besides alcohol, lead is another substance that has been shown to make humans more aggressive. Lead is toxic, and it can affect the behavior of children who are exposed to the metal while their brains are still developing. After the passage of the Clean Air Act in 1970, refiners were required to sell unleaded gasoline. Jessica Reyes, an economist at Amherst College, has argued that the children born after that law took effect breathed in less lead from car exhaust and that their brains were healthier as a result. She has estimated that the removal of lead reduced violent crime by no less than 56 percent. Other researchers are skeptical that lead could have caused such a large decline in U.S. violence, but many agree that the Clean Air Act had some effect on crime.

this is what your article said wacko
 
:D Are you so OUT OF THE LOOP you've forgotten how this FORUM thing works? We all posted on San Bernardino in REAL TIME and corrected our INFO as it was REPORTED. You HAVE NOT called out any CONS who also jumped in with THEIR OPINIONS.

This was NO DIFFERENT from the way we've posted on ELECTION DAYS or DEBATE nights. Get over yourself, YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS OF THIS BOARD! :rofl2:

He demanded that I "shut the fuck up" earlier.

Careful, or you're gonna trigger him in his safe space. :D
 
I know what the article said Desh. I read it and posted it. You didn't believe gun violence was down. I gave you an article showing it was. Are you going to refute their numbers?
 
:D Are you so OUT OF THE LOOP you've forgotten how this FORUM thing works? We all posted on San Bernardino in REAL TIME and corrected our INFO as it was REPORTED. You HAVE NOT called out any CONS who also jumped in with THEIR OPINIONS.

This was NO DIFFERENT from the way we've posted on ELECTION DAYS or DEBATE nights. Get over yourself, YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS OF THIS BOARD! :rofl2:

He is hilarious!

Type bigger Superduper, I can't hear you! lol
 
:D Are you so OUT OF THE LOOP you've forgotten how this FORUM thing works? We all posted on San Bernardino in REAL TIME and corrected our INFO as it was REPORTED. You HAVE NOT called out any CONS who also jumped in with THEIR OPINIONS.

This was NO DIFFERENT from the way we've posted on ELECTION DAYS or DEBATE nights. Get over yourself, YOU ARE NOT THE BOSS OF THIS BOARD! :rofl2:

No... you didn't... even the reporter didn't. It was bullshit from the start. Not even for a second was it 2-3 blocks away. Clearly it was easy to look up. Instead of doing that, Rana believed the spoon fed bullshit from the media and then proclaimed I was exaggerating. You are all fucking lemmings and have proven that in each of the cases I mentioned. You never fucking learn.

This was NOT a fucking OPINION. It was an easily verifiable FACT.

It is truly comical that you pretend you were posting in real time though. Fucking awesome. Idiots.
 
If NO LAW will prevent this, WHAT WILL?

Nothing in a free society. We can ban guns, have the government go across the country and collect all three hundred million (or whatever the number is) of existing guns and search every car, container, airline etc. coming into this country to make sure no guns exist in America (and if cops are still allowed to possess them to make sure they are never stolen as has happen recently). Then we can be pretty sure there will be no more shootings.

Outside of something that extreme we run the risk of shootings happening.
 
I know what the article said Desh. I read it and posted it. You didn't believe gun violence was down. I gave you an article showing it was. Are you going to refute their numbers?

I didn't see more guns as one of the reasons though. Another article I read also credits the crack epidemic being over as a reason, too.
 
No... you didn't... even the reporter didn't. It was bullshit from the start. Not even for a second was it 2-3 blocks away. Clearly it was easy to look up. Instead of doing that, Rana believed the spoon fed bullshit from the media and then proclaimed I was exaggerating. You are all fucking lemmings and have proven that in each of the cases I mentioned. You never fucking learn.

This was NOT a fucking OPINION. It was an easily verifiable FACT.

It is truly comical that you pretend you were posting in real time though. Fucking awesome. Idiots.

I LOVE when you rightie HACKS ignore the DEATH and DESTRUCTION to focus on the INCONSEQUENTIAL. Now tell us how FEWER GUNS wouldn't prevent this kind of TRAGEDY. ;)
 
Nothing in a free society. We can ban guns, have the government go across the country and collect all three hundred million (or whatever the number is) of existing guns and search every car, container, airline etc. coming into this country to make sure no guns exist in America (and if cops are still allowed to possess them to make sure they are never stolen as has happen recently). Then we can be pretty sure there will be no more shootings.

Outside of something that extreme we run the risk of shootings happening.

What is a solution to the problem, then?
 
Back
Top