Denmark passes controversial bill to seize assets and valuables from refugees

moon2012 said:
Let's review some of the comic aspects of xenophobia;

For starters, refugee children don't have any of the ' barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes ' that you believe you've identified.
Secondly, none of the refugee women look upon women as ' chattels '
In general terms that should permit you to accept roughly two-thirds of the refugees on the grounds that they don't fit your profile for rejection.
Thirdly, to attempt to claim that 100% of all the adult male refugees ' treat women like chattels ' and have ' barbaric and uncivilised cultural ...er... attributes [sic] ' would be plain silly just in mathematical terms, let alone allowing for the fact that you probably haven't met even one of them let alone 100%
Of course, it isn't really comic. It's pathetic. People shouldn't laugh at pathos.
Click to expand...

yes information sociopaths just cant seem to incorporate into their thinking.



they don't think of other people are the same as them ( you know real flesh and blood humans)they think of them as merely obstacles or objects tha migh have some use o themselves.



these sociopaths for some reason think they should run things.


they have broken brains



We only let fully functioning humans run things.



Otherwise the sociopaths will never value human life.


let them rule


people are going to be heaved on the recycle pile at the convienence of sociopaths
 
moon2012 said:
Get Google to fund them- if you can prise your despicable prime minister out of Google's arse.
Click to expand...

That's a completely different topic, looks like you're grasping at straws now.

So, regardless of Google, why should the UK taxpayer fund these fakeugees?
 
moon2012 said:
I don't have any of ' my own people '. I'm human.

However, if I were a doctor I'd be inclined towards treating a wounded elephant before a human fascist.
Click to expand...

If you were a doctor, I'm assuming you would prefer to have a reasonable salary and acceptable standard of living, yes or no?

So, what allows you to work in a modern hospital with staff, equipment, salary etc....something to do with having a robust nation state perhaps? And this will no longer exist if people like you choose to throw it away by giving the majority of the rest of the world a free ride.
 
evince said:
We only let fully functioning humans run things.

Otherwise the sociopaths will never value human life.
let them rule
people are going to be heaved on the recycle pile at the convienence of sociopaths
Click to expand...

Yet again, you come up with this incoherent drivel - but if this is the case, then why aren't all the 'nice' Western countries saving the poor around the World; why aren't we letting in all the poor of India, Bangladesh, Paraguay, Cambodia etc..?
 
Toby451 said:
That's a completely different topic, looks like you're grasping at straws now.

So, regardless of Google, why should the UK taxpayer fund these fakeugees?
Click to expand...

Are you trying to overlook the huge sum, possibly billions of dollars, that Google has avoided paying in the UK- to the detriment of the very tax-payers you now claim would be burdened by taking in refugees ? That's the standpoint of your Tory boss. Your position is that you would rather allow multi-national companies to avoid paying their taxes than rescue refugees from exploitation or drowning ?
 
Toby451 said:
If you were a doctor, I'm assuming you would prefer to have a reasonable salary and acceptable standard of living, yes or no?

So, what allows you to work in a modern hospital with staff, equipment, salary etc....something to do with having a robust nation state perhaps? And this will no longer exist if people like you choose to throw it away by giving the majority of the rest of the world a free ride.
Click to expand...


Again- if your Tory boss and his henchman desisted from protecting their donor companies and other tax avoiders then there would be sufficient funds to upgrade the free care system . Your government - and those who support its despicable policies- are parasites .

UK: Conservative MEP's lobby to protect Google's £30bn Bermuda island tax haven

The British government has been lobbying the EU to remove Bermuda, used by Google to avoid paying high rates of tax, from an official tax haven blacklist. A memo allegedly circulated among Tory Treasury ministers described measures against the Island nation as "unhelpful".

The former British colony was added to the blacklist, drawn up last year, as companies are not liable to pay corporation tax there - thus multinationals like Google use Bermuda to avoid paying higher rates of tax. The 30-nation list has been drawn up by member states who are concerned about tax revenues being funnelled offshore.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/uk-conserv...googles-30bn-bermuda-island-tax-haven-1541093
Click to expand...

They have no excuse- and neither do their scurrilous fan-boys, such as yourself. They- and you- prefer to strip refugees of their valuables.
 
Last edited:
moon2012 said:
Let's review some of the comic aspects of xenophobia;

For starters, refugee children don't have any of the ' barbaric and uncivilized cultural attributes ' that you believe you've identified.
Secondly, none of the refugee women look upon women as ' chattels '
In general terms that should permit you to accept roughly two-thirds of the refugees on the grounds that they don't fit your profile for rejection.
Thirdly, to attempt to claim that 100% of all the adult male refugees ' treat women like chattels ' and have ' barbaric and uncivilised cultural ...er... attributes [sic] ' would be plain silly just in mathematical terms, let alone allowing for the fact that you probably haven't met even one of them let alone 100%
Of course, it isn't really comic. It's pathetic. People shouldn't laugh at pathos.
Click to expand...

What a pathetic straw-man. Who said anything about 100%?

The fact is, many of these refugees/freeloaders/terrorists come from a part of the world where women are looked upon as human property. And when they see them out alone and unaccompanied by a male, they are free game. You should forget bleating about 'neoZionism' and the Palestinians and condemn the way women are treated in Muslim lands. And now, parts of Europe because of insane immigration policy.

But you won't do that, because it doesn't fit your agenda.
 
moon2012 said:
Are you trying to overlook the huge sum, possibly billions of dollars, that Google has avoided paying in the UK- to the detriment of the very tax-payers you now claim would be burdened by taking in refugees ? That's the standpoint of your Tory boss. Your position is that you would rather allow multi-national companies to avoid paying their taxes than rescue refugees from exploitation or drowning ?
Click to expand...

Even if the govt were to sort out the tax system there's no reason they should hand the revenue over to a bunch of filthy sponging illegal immigrants - would be best spent on helping the local white British people with all manner of things - you do realise that some Brit families are also poor. Alternatively the money could be spent on infrastructure, defence etc..
 
moon2012 said:
Your position is that you would rather allow multi-national companies to avoid paying their taxes than rescue refugees from exploitation or drowning ?
Click to expand...
Let enough of those fuckers drown and they'll stop getting onto the boats! - it's not rocket science. And of course, the parents putting their kids onto these unsafe boats should be arrested for manslaughter.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
What a pathetic straw-man. Who said anything about 100%?

The fact is, many of these refugees/freeloaders/terrorists come from a part of the world where women are looked upon as human property. And when they see them out alone and unaccompanied by a male, they are free game. You should forget bleating about 'neoZionism' and the Palestinians and condemn the way women are treated in Muslim lands. And now, parts of Europe because of insane immigration policy.

But you won't do that, because it doesn't fit your agenda.
Click to expand...

The fact that you've avoided addressing my rebuttal of your over-simplified objections to helping refugees indicates that my rebuttal is valid. It's your own agenda that you are trying to defend.

Further, mysogyny is a world-wide problem, including in Israel- so that hound won't run as part of your anti-refugee case.
 
moon2012 said:
They have no excuse- and neither do their scurrilous fan-boys, such as yourself. They- and you- prefer to strip refugees of their valuables.
Click to expand...

Of course, because if the fakeugess have reasonable sums of money on them, they should be made to contribute, just like everyone else. Otherwise why don't they just fly off to a cheaper country, I hear 1000US goes a long way in Thailand - yet they choose to come to Northern Europe, one of the most expensive regions in the World....go figure, these cockroaches just want to infest and breed at our expense - no thanks!
 
Toby451 said:
Even if the govt were to sort out the tax system there's no reason they should hand the revenue over to a bunch of filthy sponging illegal immigrants - would be best spent on helping the local white British people with all manner of things - you do realise that some Brit families are also poor. Alternatively the money could be spent on infrastructure, defence etc..
Click to expand...

So hold a referendum and ask Brits where they'd like their taxes spent- instead of leaving it to your Tory collaborators to feather their nests.
I notice that you don't mention ' local black British people '. I suspect you're a white nationalist- probably also a racist and an ethnic cleansing buff.
 
Toby451 said:
Of course, because if the fakeugess have reasonable sums of money on them, they should be made to contribute, just like everyone else. Otherwise why don't they just fly off to a cheaper country, I hear 1000US goes a long way in Thailand - yet they choose to come to Northern Europe, one of the most expensive regions in the World....go figure, these cockroaches just want to infest and breed at our expense - no thanks!
Click to expand...

There are- doubtless- a great many Brits who would rather have them than you. Do you stay off the streets ?
 
moon2012 said:
So hold a referendum and ask Brits where they'd like their taxes spent- instead of leaving it to your Tory collaborators to feather their nests.
Click to expand...
referendum, referendum, referendum....what is it with you lib types? huh, leaders are elected to lead not dither around with student room style raising of hands - and WTF do you keep going on about the Tories anyway, like do you think I actually voted for them or something?? lol.

Anyway, I've answered the tax topic, the revenue if gleaned back from Google should not go to the refugees.

And do you have something against helping white people?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top