Barry, just say you misspoke

According to about half the nation, if you are tried for perjury it means that they are attacking you because you had sex with a fat ugly young girl. Does Barry have sex with fat ugly young girls?
 
Watermark said:
He should buy a law that says he can lie under oath, RS.
Click to expand...

What are you competing with cypress and bac for stupidest responses?

Or he should become an agent of the state, then he could lie as much as he likes under oath or any other time. Cops lie all the time under oath and rarely if ever face repercussions. Martha was sent to prison for proclaiming her innocence.
 
RStringfield said:
What are you competing with cypress and bac for stupidest responses?

Or he should become an agent of the state, then he could lie as much as he likes under oath or any other time. Cops lie all the time under oath and rarely if ever face repercussions. Martha was sent to prison for proclaiming her innocence.
Click to expand...

...

Actually, she was sent to prison for insider trading.
 
I mean, if you want to attack anarcho capitalism, come up with some legitimate arguments instead of ignorant potshots.
 
Fucking George Bush sends young men to die using lies (not that he really needed it to get the warmongering Dems to go along, but he did use them to sway public opinion) and that passes without incident. Martha Stewart sells some stock goes to prison, Bonds, allegedly, took a drug that, MAYbe, helped him hit a few more homers and faces prison. It's ridiculous.
 
RStringfield said:
Fucking George Bush sends young men to die using lies (not that he really needed it to get the warmongering Dems to go along, but he did use them to sway public opinion) and that passes without incident. Martha Stewart sells some stock goes to prison, Bonds, allegedly, took a drug that, MAYbe, helped him hit a few more homers and faces prison. It's ridiculous.
Click to expand...

He's not going to prison for taking the drug, he's going to prison for perjury. If he just would have admitted that he took steroids he wouldn't have this problem. He didn't have to take the stand. You're never required to give evidence against yourself in America, unlike almost every other nation on Earth.
 
RStringfield said:
Fucking George Bush sends young men to die using lies (not that he really needed it to get the warmongering Dems to go along, but he did use them to sway public opinion) and that passes without incident. Martha Stewart sells some stock goes to prison, Bonds, allegedly, took a drug that, MAYbe, helped him hit a few more homers and faces prison. It's ridiculous.
Click to expand...
I don't think that having sex with George Bush sends anybody to die. That seems to be rather amorphous logic there...

;)
 
Watermark said:
He's not going to prison for taking the drug, he's going to prison for perjury. If he just would have admitted that he took steroids he wouldn't have this problem. He didn't have to take the stand. You're never required to give evidence against yourself in America, unlike almost every other nation on Earth.
Click to expand...
Um. The Fifth does not apply before a Grand Jury you can be forced to give testimony.
 
Watermark said:
He's not going to prison for taking the drug, he's going to prison for perjury. If he just would have admitted that he took steroids he wouldn't have this problem. He didn't have to take the stand. You're never required to give evidence against yourself in America, unlike almost every other nation on Earth.
Click to expand...

You don't know what you are talking about.

He may have perjured himself over the state trying to fucking shake him down for a non crime. They can't get him for the non crime, now they are going after some other bs.

I can't believe you support these envy based witch hunts and ever called yourself a libertarian.

They had no right to be bugging him about whether he took steroids in the first place.
 
No, people hate them because they make obscene amounts of money for doing absolutely nothing. Now, I admit, I am a huge fan of capitalism, so I would never support limiting the amount of money athletes earn....but still, is it any wonder people are a little pissed sometimes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top