Politics aside do folks on this board support our action in Syria?

blackascoal said:
With respect, there were very few liberals standing against the horrors that Obama brought to Libya. We bombed the hell out of Libya .. even bombed one of the only sources of water for millions of desert people. Liberals stood silent.

Obama took drone warfare way past what George Bush did. He droned children picking up wood, weddings, and funerals. More than that, Obama used double-tap strikes .. which are against international law. Drone a gathering of too often, innocent people .. and when the ambulances and first-responders arrive to help the victims .. drone them again. That's fucking evil.

No disrespect intended my friend.
Click to expand...
No disrespect taken. I'm simply confused by the outrage because of chemical weapons use, and not the issues you addressed....no matter where they occur.

Hell...why don't we see pictures of maimed children on the news after our attacks?


Again....this is going to be the perverbial chickens/roost scenario when others get ahold of drones.
 
Darth Omar said:
I would imagine they'd think twice before using chemical weapons again.
Click to expand...
You think? Syria knows that Russia will not stand by idly while tiny hands lobs more bombs into Syria. In fact, this might turn into a challenge to see exactly how stupid trump is.

Sure...beat your chest with your tiny hands, while your flaccid dick angers the shit out of you. Do something as stupid as launching an all out attack on Syria. See how that shakes out.
 
Sailor said:
No. Just pointing out quite clearly the hypocrisy of both side. Their side is in power and they do something fucked up, it is ok. The other side does it, oh....the horror. How about both sides wake up and take a look at reality to what is really occurring around the world objectively and without political agenda. It would be a real eye opener.
Click to expand...
We can both wait patiently.
 
17799906_10155764302704881_2819162755368939976_n.jpg
 
Althea said:
No disrespect taken. I'm simply confused by the outrage because of chemical weapons use, and not the issues you addressed....no matter where they occur.

Hell...why don't we see pictures of maimed children on the news after our attacks?


Again....this is going to be the perverbial chickens/roost scenario when others get ahold of drones.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Vietnam taught the warmongers to keep images of the dead off the TV. They're never going to let that happen again.

This opens a whole new side of warfare when you don't even know who your enemy is.
 
Althea said:
How was it meaningless, if there were no other instances of chemical weapons use until trump took office? Maybe Assad was empowered by the group of incompetents that trump has in his cabinet? I'm guessing that nice Jewish boy in the expensive suit doesn't scare anyone in the Mid East?
Click to expand...

Jewish boy lol? Can we say black boy or Muslim boy now?

Assad gassed 1500 people in a 'post-Red Line' chemical weapons attack. What's getting missed in the partisan bickering is that we scored some points with the Syrian people. That matters in diplomacy.

At the cost of zero American lives. I'll call it a win, for now at least.
 
Althea said:
I'm not sure how you strayed so far from the original topic? Should the U.S continue to kill innocents with drone bombings? Not just in Syria, but anywhere? Because once those crazy motherfuckers have drones capable of bombing us, it's going to get pretty freaky here.
Click to expand...

when did that become the original topic?
 
Althea said:
You think? Syria knows that Russia will not stand by idly while tiny hands lobs more bombs into Syria. In fact, this might turn into a challenge to see exactly how stupid trump is.

Sure...beat your chest with your tiny hands, while your flaccid dick angers the shit out of you. Do something as stupid as launching an all out attack on Syria. See how that shakes out.
Click to expand...

Would this be a good time to mention that North Korea is looking for a fight? They're going to test Trump's red line in the sand by launching an ICBM.

Will North Korea fire a missile capable of hitting the U.S. mainland? Probably.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...u-s-mainland-probably/?utm_term=.cabb84dcaf3d

Mr. Limp Dick claims that he will never allow that to happen.
 
Althea said:
I'm not sure how you strayed so far from the original topic? Should the U.S continue to kill innocents with drone bombings? Not just in Syria, but anywhere? Because once those crazy motherfuckers have drones capable of bombing us, it's going to get pretty freaky here.
Click to expand...

Yep..... They (who ever they may be) can carryout assassinations & extra judicial killings just like we do...... They will simply give themselves this right, as we have done & it's open season.......

Us doing it in Yemen or Somalia is one thing, but them doing it to us is a horrendous act of war........:mad:
 
cawacko said:
for those so inclined i'm curious why you do or don't support the bombing (leaving the political actors out of it)
Click to expand...

i honestly don't understand the syria situation much, it's never been something I have paid much attention to. On the matter of the cruise missiles, I am ambivalent given 0 casualties, it was an airbase that supposedly launch a chem attack (could have been a false flag).

But I wouldn't support putting troops on the ground. That's just what hawks like mccain and other neo-con globalists have been dying for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top