Renewable Energy Sets Record in USA

From 7% to 10% and you're all getting hysterical about it ?

Thats like getting crazy because we have a storm in January and then another in June and claiming its amazing that storms have doubled in the just half a year....

Big deal ?....I don't think so.....
 
Enough. You're being willfully ignorant, or just trolling.

Fossil fuels - based on how they are consumed, and how they are produced - are a finite resource. Period.

Wind, solar, tidal & the rest are considered sustainable, because they are not finite.

Just stop. Your trolling on this is lacking intelligence & is counterproductive. As far as I'm concerned, you can drill as much as you want - here, there & everywhere. And that will be fine for awhile, but not for more than another generation.


You don't have proof of the first claim. You just "think" you know because it is what you want to believe with your whole heart.

You also have this childlike belief that despite hundreds of years of research that someone is going to suddenly overcome the limitations of physics and make wind and solar "sustainable". I guess you think that Bill Nye the Science Guy is going to overcome lack of windy days? Or cloud cover? Or somehow make the energy easily transportable?

Yeah, really sustainable

You just want these words to mean what you want them to mean.
 
Enough. You're being willfully ignorant, or just trolling.

Fossil fuels - based on how they are consumed, and how they are produced - are a finite resource. Period.

Wind, solar, tidal & the rest are considered sustainable, because they are not finite.

Just stop. Your trolling on this is lacking intelligence & is counterproductive. As far as I'm concerned, you can drill as much as you want - here, there & everywhere. And that will be fine for awhile, but not for more than another generation.

Bullshit there is enough shale oil and gas for at least another 100 years and more is being found all the time!

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Last edited:
There really isn't a reason to be intellectually dishonest about it, unless you're just trying to troll.

You definitely know what 'renewable' means when it comes to alternatives vs. fossil fuels.

This is another one of those times where IHA is wrong and I am right.

Since he's physically incapable of admitting as much, he resorts to his infantile word games.
 
well to be fair, none of us agree with you.....I think we've all pretty much agreed with each other that its based on whether the source is renewable.......

Well, TECHNICALLY oil is "renewable".

All IHA has to do is come up with a viable alternative fuel source to supply our needs for the TENS OF MILLIONS OF YEARS it will take to "renew" our supplies of oil.
 
Doubt itt as Trump wants to remove the huge Obama subsidies, surely you would approve that?

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo

This is where the rubber meets the road with alternatives. If the subsidies are removed, will people pay extra for their energy? That is where one will find out how serious people are about this or not. The pocketbook. That being said, why does alternative energy cost more? There is not reason it should. Less maintenance, no fuel costs, no pollution regulations to adhere too, etc. Nowhere near the cost to operate a conventional power plant. So why the electricity cost more? That is what people need to be asking their politicians. And demanding some changes.
 
This is where the rubber meets the road with alternatives. If the subsidies are removed, will people pay extra for their energy? That is where one will find out how serious people are about this or not. The pocketbook. That being said, why does alternative energy cost more? There is not reason it should. Less maintenance, no fuel costs, no pollution regulations to adhere too, etc. Nowhere near the cost to operate a conventional power plant. So why the electricity cost more? That is what people need to be asking their politicians. And demanding some changes.

Already it is cheaper to install solar and batteries if one needs even one power pole because of a long driveway.
 
Doubt itt as Trump wants to remove the huge Obama subsidies, surely you would approve that?

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo

we can take a look after we balance the budget.....I would probably prefer energy subsidies over bolstering California's pension deficits........
 
What people are truly incapable of understanding is just how much pressure there would be on electricity generation if electric cars really took off. Even a million cars would bring cause serious on the transmission grids and power stations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...lear-power-stations-needed-electric-cars.html

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
I am calling total bullshit on that article.
The majority of charging will always be done at night, especially during the wee hours when most gen plants are idle.
If anything a vast increase in EVs will enable plants to run around the clock with a much more balanced load.
Furthermore each EV makes the grid smarter, acting as capacitors. Hybrids can also generate electricity providing additional buffering.
Finaly the premise of "all" vehicles becoming electric is implausible.
Such will never be the case.
 
Back
Top