why hand the evidence over to the Perp?

christiefan915 said:
Pay attention to the 3rd paragraph. The quote is from MOORE'S lawyer asking to have MOORE's forensic document examiner look at the writing. Not Allred's expert, not an independent expert, MOORE'S expert.
Click to expand...

give it up you stupid fuck....everyone but you has agreed to an independent expert.......
 
NOVA said:
The Senate don't have the authority to question him at all....he ain't a Senator and has been charged with anything because there is no verifiable proof of any crime.

If the yearbook writing is legitimate why won't Alread let it be verified
Click to expand...

obviously she knows its not authentic and doesn't want word to get out before the election.....
 
christiefan915 said:
If he's so sure it's a forgery why won't he testify under oath? Nelson will.
Click to expand...

because when he says he didn't do it under oath, just as when he said it while not under oath, you aren't going to believe him.......on the other hand, if an expert says the document is forged even you might suspect you've been duped......(but probably not)........
 
NOVA said:
No one EVER said she HAD TO hand over anything....she don't have to, and discovery is irrelevant....its public knowledge it exists....
He's asking her to have it verified by handwriting experts....if she is so sure its authentic, whats the problem.....
Click to expand...

lol

Discovery has nothing to do with whether it’s public knowledge or not. It’s the mechanism by which one party obtains evidence from the other. When it comes time, after charges are filed, he can get his own expert, as well as obtain any results of theirs. Until then, pally boy, it’s private property and she isn’t compelled to honor ANY request.

Comprende, pally boy?
 
NOVA said:
Because the Senate Judiciary Committee has nothing to do with this....why won't she allow 3rd party experts to examine the evidence ?
The Senate has no right to interfere in a State election because of rumors....
And don't give a stupid answer like Desh's "why should she turn the yearbook over to Moore"....no one suggested that in the first place....
Click to expand...

Watch it suddenly "disappear", during an alleged burglary.

:evilnod:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
because when he says he didn't do it under oath, just as when he said it while not under oath, you aren't going to believe him.......on the other hand, if an expert says the document is forged even you might suspect you've been duped......(but probably not)........
Click to expand...

The Senate Committee crap is just a diversionary tactic by Allred. She's know that will never happen and is a blatant attempt to stop analysis by a third party.
 
NOVA said:
The Senate don't have the authority to question him at all....he ain't a Senator and has been charged with anything because there is no verifiable proof of any crime.

If the yearbook writing is legitimate why won't Alread let it be verified
Click to expand...

Even if you are uncomfortable with the yearbook, there are 8 other women who have come forward. There are co workers who can testify that he enjoyed going to the mall and chasing teen age girls. Then there is the mall itself that banned him from entering, just because of the young girl issue.
 
I recall there were a number of women accusing Trump before the election as well.......once the election was over and they failed in their intent, they all melted away.......
 
christiefan915 said:
LOL. You so desperately want to believe that. You're truly pitiful.

"He called on Allred to release the yearbook so experts hired by Moore can analyze the handwriting."

"[Jauregui] said the Moore campaign has contracted a handwriting expert to examine the authenticity of the signature appended to the yearbook note."

…As part of the request for preservation of evidence the Moores request: (i) immediate and professional preservation of the yearbook and all other evidence as described above, (ii) reasonable but immediate efforts to create and maintain evidence regarding a chain of custody pertaining to all potential evidence, and (iii) that the yearbook be released to the custody of our expert forensic document examiner within two (2) business days of your receipt of this correspondence.
Click to expand...
you can repeat that claim as many times as you want, all it does is increase the number of lies you've told.......
 
floridafan said:
Even if you are uncomfortable with the yearbook, there are 8 other women who have come forward. There are co workers who can testify that he enjoyed going to the mall and chasing teen age girls. Then there is the mall itself that banned him from entering, just because of the young girl issue.
Click to expand...

Did 8 women acccuse him of sexual assault? In my mind they are the only accusations that matter.

There are only two of those and one is falling apart. Stop conflating issues
 
Whataboutism said:
Did 8 women acccuse him of sexual assault? In my mind they are the only accusations that matter.

There are only two of those and one is falling apart. Stop conflating issues
Click to expand...

Nothing is falling apart, in fact it gets worse each day. Read my post on Alabama newspapers.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Discovery has nothing to do with whether it’s public knowledge or not. It’s the mechanism by which one party obtains evidence from the other. When it comes time, after charges are filed, he can get his own expert, as well as obtain any results of theirs. Until then, pally boy, it’s private property and she isn’t compelled to honor ANY request.

Comprende, pally boy?
Click to expand...

Thats what I just said....idiot

No one EVER said she HAD TO hand over anything....she don't have to, and discovery is irrelevant....its public knowledge it exists....
He's asking her to have it verified by handwriting experts....if she is so sure its authentic, whats the problem.....

Are you seriously implying there are gonna be charges made over allegations with no proof of a crime ?
 
floridafan said:
Even if you are uncomfortable with the yearbook, there are 8 other women who have come forward. There are co workers who can testify that he enjoyed going to the mall and chasing teen age girls. Then there is the mall itself that banned him from entering, just because of the young girl issue.
Click to expand...

Now you're trying to say going to a mall and ogling girls is a crime...? seriously ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top