why hand the evidence over to the Perp?

PraiseKek said:
Yes yes, you people are so laughably transparent that it's funny, they were invited to provide a 2nd hand writing analyst of their own choosing you fucking faggot.
Click to expand...

Big fucking deal, prick. Right now, it’s private property. Moore, his attorney and you can go fuck yourselves. Moore, of course, would prefer that he was an underage girl if he wished to fuck himself.
 
floridafan said:
To be banned from the mall must have been caused by something serious. You know so well that he did much more than that.
Click to expand...


But, as President Ronald Reagan used to say, facts are stubborn things, and the fact is Roy Moore was not banned from the Gadsden Mall for predatory activities:


Remember the mall worker who so convincingly said Roy Moore was banned for harassing young girls decades ago? Well the mall manager from 1981-1996 came out and said Moore was never banned so far as he knows. The time frame isn’t exact, but it would seem that something like that would be common knowledge for some time.

The media reported the mall worker’s interview as if it were fact over all the major networks, but it was hearsay

Barnes Boyle, who was manager of the Gadsden Mall from 1981 to 1996, told WBRC News in Alabama to his knowledge Moore was not banned.

“To my knowledge, he was not banned from the mall,” Boyle told the news station.

“We did have written reports and things. But to my knowledge, he was not banned from the mall,” Boyle told WBRC in Birmingham, Ala.

Most of the accusations were in the 1970s but Moore was prominent and if he was banned in the ’70s, he would likely have still known.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/11/mall_never_banned_moore_and_other_lies.html
 
domer76 said:
Big fucking deal, prick. Right now, it’s private property. Moore, his attorney and you can go fuck yourselves. Moore, of course, would prefer that he was an underage girl if he wished to fuck himself.
Click to expand...

The fact that the ugly lying whores won't hand it over for analysis is all the evidence any human with a functioning brain needs, it speaks volumes and proves exactly how fucking retarded nigger dick taking faggots like you really are.
 
PraiseKek said:
The fact that the ugly lying whores won't hand it over for analysis is all the evidence any human with a functioning brain needs, it speaks volumes and proves exactly how fucking retarded nigger dick taking faggots like you really are.
Click to expand...

Poor little taintstain. Still got that tit in a wringer, don’t you, pussy?

sarah-penn-ink.jpg
 
christiefan915 said:
Do you understand that without any supporting FACTS, Moore's refutation is just him flapping HIS gums?
Click to expand...

Without PROVING what your claims are facts, Moore's refutation is no worse that Allreds nor any better than her accusations....
 
Last edited:
NOVA said:
Without PROVING what you claim are facts, Moore's refutation is no worse that Allreds nor any better than her accusations....
Click to expand...

Did you ask for supporting facts from the women who accused Clinton or did you accept their comments at face value? Broaddrick never went to the cops and she denied the assault in court but you guys still bring it up.

Now before the wack jobs here accuse me of being an enabler, I believe that something happened with Broaddrick but just don't know if it was rape.

"Broaddrick did not initially report the alleged assault to law enforcement, but she did make the claim in interviews with the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and The New York Times. Years later, she was subpoenaed to testify in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. As part of her testimony, she signed an affidavit denying that Clinton sexually assaulted her.

She later recanted that denial when interviewed by investigators from Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's office. But, House managers chose not to call her as a witness in the case to impeach President Bill Clinton.

In a February 1999 NBC interview, correspondent Lisa Myers asked Broaddrick, "did Bill Clinton or anyone near him ever threaten you, try to intimidate you, do anything to keep you silent?"

Broaddrick answered: "no."
 
christiefan915 said:
Did you ask for supporting facts from the women who accused Clinton or did you accept their comments at face value? Broaddrick never went to the cops and she denied the assault in court but you guys still bring it up.

Now before the wack jobs here accuse me of being an enabler, I believe that something happened with Broaddrick but just don't know if it was rape.

"Broaddrick did not initially report the alleged assault to law enforcement, but she did make the claim in interviews with the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and The New York Times. Years later, she was subpoenaed to testify in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. As part of her testimony, she signed an affidavit denying that Clinton sexually assaulted her.

She later recanted that denial when interviewed by investigators from Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's office. But, House managers chose not to call her as a witness in the case to impeach President Bill Clinton.

In a February 1999 NBC interview, correspondent Lisa Myers asked Broaddrick, "did Bill Clinton or anyone near him ever threaten you, try to intimidate you, do anything to keep you silent?"

Broaddrick answered: "no."
Click to expand...
Always changing the subject at hand aren't you....
Clinton was impeached for perjury and I absolutely believe he was guilty....
Paula Jones took him to court and was paid a tidy sum...
Broaddrick had no conclusive proof of rape...except telling a friend about it right after it happened..it was nothing more than a accusation and still is.....
Lisa Myers should have asked that question to Kathleen Willey....she made that claim of being threatened....
 
domer76 said:
lol

If you wish to split hairs on your verbiage:

“Moores lawyers had a right to ask for the handwriting...”

I’ll repeat. They don’t have a right. Period.

Comprende, pally boy?
Click to expand...
They don’t have a right. Period.

Thats about as stupid and ignorant a statement as I've heard in awhile.... worthy of desh.....
and of course you dumer....
 
NOVA said:
Always changing the subject at hand aren't you....
Clinton was impeached for perjury and I absolutely believe he was guilty....
Paula Jones took him to court and was paid a tidy sum...
Broaddrick had no conclusive proof of rape...except telling a friend about it right after it happened..it was nothing more than a accusation and still is.....
Lisa Myers should have asked that question to Kathleen Willey....she made that claim of being threatened....
Click to expand...

The subject applies because so many here have criticized Moore's women for not reporting their assaults.
 
christiefan915 said:
The subject applies because so many here have criticized Moore's women for not reporting their assaults.
Click to expand...
Seems a few have forward since he's running for the Senate...

All it takes is one women coming forward with verifiable proof....as in filthy Franken's case....he certainly couldn't deny photographic proof....
thats better than 10 with unfounded accusations to me....there used to be a list on the net of about 2 dozen complaints against Bill Clinton dating back to his
school days in England, rape included....they went nowhere and only had 'smear' value....none could be proven....all I need is one is actually proven....
Like I said several times I suspect Moore's accusers are telling the truth because his denials were lame and not credible....but I can't hang him on my opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top