why hand the evidence over to the Perp?

PostmodernProphet said:
give it up you stupid fuck....everyone but you has agreed to an independent expert.......
Click to expand...

You must be senile. I don't know how your brain screwed up a simple phrase like "(iii) that the yearbook be released to the custody of our expert forensic document examiner within two (2) business days of your receipt of this correspondence."

The letter doesn't demand that she have the writing analyzed within two business days but that she turn over the book to Moore.

Allred hasn't picked an expert or had the writing analyzed yet. She wants the SJC to pick the expert, that SJC that has more repubs than Dems on it.

And all your bloviating doesn't change that fact.
 
christiefan915 said:
I know that's what they started out saying but the letter shows they changed their mind. And just to make you feel better the letter was taken from Breitbart, not some left wing site.

"The letter to Allred was dated yesterday and obtained by Breitbart News."

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...lease-yearbook-demands-evidence-be-preserved/
Click to expand...

The letter changes nothing....she can have her experts present if and when the yearbook is examined....as stated in the video. That is the crux of our disagreement....

and its obvious that if any 'expert' damages or alters any evidence, Any “testing” performed on the evidence prior to its release to my clients and/or this firm which said “testing” results in alteration and/or destruction of the evidence, and/or any part of the evidence, will be considered spoliation.

You're wrong dear, just admit you made a false claim, its no big deal to make a mistake....
 
NOVA said:
Thats what I just said....idiot

No one EVER said she HAD TO hand over anything....she don't have to, and discovery is irrelevant....its public knowledge it exists....
He's asking her to have it verified by handwriting experts....if she is so sure its authentic, whats the problem.....

Are you seriously implying there are gonna be charges made over allegations with no proof of a crime ?
Click to expand...

My comment about discovery, if you can focus long enough, moron, was in response to Yaya’s post in #29. It doesn’t apply because there is no evidence to turn over using that mechasim. It has NOTHING to do with it being public knowledge or not.

You have your panties all in a knot and go on about the absurd demand by Moore’s attorney to turn it over in 48 hours. Laughably pathetic. He has no right to demand anything.

I doubt there will be charges. Until then, pull your tits out of the wringer on your desperate need for them to release the book to Moore.
 
NOVA said:
The letter changes nothing....she can have her experts present if and when the yearbook is examined....as stated in the video. That is the crux of our disagreement....

and its obvious that if any 'expert' damages or alters any evidence, Any “testing” performed on the evidence prior to its release to my clients and/or this firm which said “testing” results in alteration and/or destruction of the evidence, and/or any part of the evidence, will be considered spoliation.

You're wrong dear, just admit you made a false claim, its no big deal to make a mistake....
Click to expand...

Do you understand that since no charges have been filed Allred is under no obligation to hand over the book?
 
christiefan915 said:
Do you understand that since no charges have been filed Allred is under no obligation to hand over the book?
Click to expand...
Of course, and I've stated as such in several previous posts....

and as long as she is using it as proof of something, Moores lawyers had a right to ask for the handwriting to be verified.....meanwhile Moore will be
smeared with its implications....

I personally don't believe his denials, but fair is fair.....Allred should either put or shut up......verify the handwriting is his and hang him from the nearest tree....
 
Last edited:
floridafan said:
Even if you are uncomfortable with the yearbook, there are 8 other women who have come forward. There are co workers who can testify that he enjoyed going to the mall and chasing teen age girls. Then there is the mall itself that banned him from entering, just because of the young girl issue.
Click to expand...

You keep repeating this, even though it's well known that the owner of the mall has refuted the claim.
 
NOVA said:
Of course, and I've stated as such in several previous posts....

and as long as she is using it as proof of something, Moores lawyers had a right to ask for the handwriting to be verified.....meanwhile Moore will be
smeared with its implications....

I personally don't believe his denials, but fair is fair.....Alread should either put or shut up......verify the handwriting is his and hang him from the nearest tree....
Click to expand...

Wrong again. They have no right to demand anything.
 
NOVA said:
Of course, and I've stated as such in several previous posts....

and as long as she is using it as proof of something, Moores lawyers had a right to ask for the handwriting to be verified.....meanwhile Moore will be
smeared with its implications....

I personally don't believe his denials, but fair is fair.....Allred should either put or shut up......verify the handwriting is his and hang him from the nearest tree....
Click to expand...

domer76 said:
Wrong again. They have no right to demand anything.
Click to expand...

Now where did I claim "They have a right to demand something."

dumdum, you gotta learn to read what is written...not what you think is there....
 
Last edited:
NOVA said:
Now where did I claim "They have a right to demand something."

dumdum, you gotta learn to read what is written...not what you think is there....
Click to expand...

lol

If you wish to split hairs on your verbiage:

“Moores lawyers had a right to ask for the handwriting...”

I’ll repeat. They don’t have a right. Period.

Comprende, pally boy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top