Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana.

are you saying the case I linked to did not increase the power of the Commerce Clause via court precedent?

Sure it increased it but it didn't put it in the Constitution. It's been there since 1787.

If you read the why from those supporting prohibition being done as an amendment rather than a law passed by Congress, you may understand, although put in as an amendment, it didn't have to be done that way. If you understood the difference in the process of amending/repealing an amendment vs. that of a law passed by Congress, it would go a long way in helping you see why, although not necessary, the push was for an amendment.
 
If YOU believe their claims ... then what's your issue with legalizing it?

Did I say I believe their claims?

I haven’t taken a position one way or the other with regards to legalizing pot

I am merely shredding bogus arguments.

If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.
 
That's an unsubstantiated contradiction, a dismissal, not a refutation.

If your assertion were true you'd be able to cite one factual error, and correct it.

We both know you won't.

The remainder of your spew is self-righteous ignorance, premised on falsehoods.

The fact that you think one can control the dose of inhaling marijuana more than what is in Marinol is steeped in ignorance. I stand by my statement

Just admit all ya wanna do is get high. I won’t judge you
 
Did I say I believe their claims?

I haven’t taken a position one way or the other with regards to legalizing pot

I am merely shredding bogus arguments.

If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.

Medical applications is how they got the foot in the door, so to speak.

It's been legalized for recreational use, so any "pretense" is gone.
 
Sure it increased it but it didn't put it in the Constitution. It's been there since 1787.

If you read the why from those supporting prohibition being done as an amendment rather than a law passed by Congress, you may understand, although put in as an amendment, it didn't have to be done that way. If you understood the difference in the process of amending/repealing an amendment vs. that of a law passed by Congress, it would go a long way in helping you see why, although not necessary, the push was for an amendment.

yes, the why is without, they would of had to go to each of the 50 states and passed legislation at the state level. That would of been very long and time consuming. (and probably impossible)

And now? interstate commerce includes activity that is neither cross state lines, nor commerce. And you support that Orwellian bullshit because you truly are an asshole
 
If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.

Agreed. While I don't agree with what they're doing, at least they would be honest about it.

With my work, I am quite often approached by people asking for money to buy (fill in the blank). While I will try to meet their need, mostly food requests, I don't give them money because I can smell on them what they've been "eating". However, a few weeks ago was different. I saw the guy coming toward me knowing, or at least in this case, thinking what he was going to ask. To my surprise, he was honest. He said he wasn't going to ask for money to buy food, provide for his kids, etc. His actual request was something to the effect of "I'm not going to bullshit you. I want some money to buy me a beer". Had I had cash on me, I would have given it to him for being honest.
 
yes, the why is without, they would of had to go to each of the 50 states and passed legislation at the state level. That would of been very long and time consuming. (and probably impossible)

And now? interstate commerce includes activity that is neither cross state lines, nor commerce. And you support that Orwellian bullshit because you truly are an asshole

I expected a stupid answer and got one.

The asshole and liar is you, son. You say it isn't about you which makes you a liar. That you lie about it makes you an asshole.
 
Medical applications is how they got the foot in the door, so to speak.

It's been legalized for recreational use, so any "pretense" is gone.

In other words, the potheads lied about it. So sad you support liars. In essence, it makes you one.

Can we classify it as a miracle because all of those that said they were doing it for medicinal reasons are suddenly cured of their illnesses?
 
The fact that you think one can control the dose of inhaling marijuana more than what is in Marinol is steeped in ignorance. I stand by my statement

Just admit all ya wanna do is get high. I won’t judge you


Wonder how many that claimed using it was for medicinal purposes were "cured" of their illness when it because legal for recreational use?
 
Medical applications is how they got the foot in the door, so to speak.

It's been legalized for recreational use, so any "pretense" is gone.

As I accurately pointed out, the entire medical marijuana thing was a scam to move toward legalization
 
I expected a stupid answer and got one.

The asshole and liar is you, son. You say it isn't about you which makes you a liar. That you lie about it makes you an asshole.

blablabla. liar and a pussy. if only there was a god. power brokers such as yourself would certainly find a special place in hell
 
As I accurately pointed out, the entire medical marijuana thing was a scam to move toward legalization

"Reefer Madness" was the scam. Hemp was a great cash crop.

I can't wait to see all the money and jobs created once American entrepreneurs are allowed access to the markets.
 
Did I say I believe their claims?

I haven’t taken a position one way or the other with regards to legalizing pot

I am merely shredding bogus arguments.

If people would just be honest and claim they just wanna get high, I could respect their position. But as such they hide behind bogus claims of medicinal properties.

I don't want to get high. I strongly believe in the medicinal properties of pot. I am for responsible personal choices. I am not hiding behind anything or anyone.
 
Interesting how YOU show up right after being referenced in a post to someone else.

Everyone can conclude from your statements that you have no problem with people driving drunk.

if they don't kill or injure anyone. but then fucktards like you clamor for personal responsibility of actions, then proceed to enact prohibitions on anything that would prohibit that.........just like a dictator. just admit, you're a police state activist. the nazi's would have loved you.
 
here's proof that you either have zero clue about the constitution or just don't give a fuck about it.

I don't give a fuck about a piece of shit like you. As for the Constitution, you don't have a clue because you say you do and that's all you've done, say so.
 
Back
Top