A question for federal agency integrity buffs

LittleThingy said:
Re: the bolded - he did not do that for MONTHS. And I'm sure there was internal pressure on that.

You are cherrypicking his statements. He has sought to undermine and discredit the FBI and our entire intel community from his 1st day in office. This is not disputable, and you should not be making excuses for it.
Click to expand...

The bolded is another moronic lie. What is it with you liberal liars? Can't stand the truth or facts? But we get it......it's all about....

Trump Derangement Syndrome. :rofl2:
 
Thing1 said:
Re: the bolded - he did not do that for MONTHS. And I'm sure there was internal pressure on that.

You are cherrypicking his statements. He has sought to undermine and discredit the FBI and our entire intel community from his 1st day in office. This is not disputable, and you should not be making excuses for it.
Click to expand...

Your problem is the FBI has been shown to be corrupt at the top. If they were squeaky clean you’d have an argument.

Sorry, but you don’t.
 
katzbrains said:
absolutely the decision to fire him was willy nilly, the internal process is incomplete.
Click to expand...

There you go again; making bullshit up. You really are a true to form lying leftist dumbfuck. But we get it....you have a serious case of Trump Derangement Syndrome BOY. :rofl2:
 
Thing1 said:
There is no systemic corruption.

And it's really lame to thank the board lunatic, btw.
Click to expand...

He hits the occasional shot deep into left and he’s funny lol. You birds shouldn’t hang so many curve balls in the strike zone for him.

You realize Strzok was head of counterintelligence, right? Did you think he worked in the mail room? McCabe was deputy director or whatever his title was. Not sure about Page but she wasn’t hired on for her clerical skills. All three are gone.

I’m probably missing someone and it’s likely the corruption [at the top] is more extensive than we know. Hence the need for another SP.

What would systemic corruption look like to you?
 
Darth Omar said:
He hits the ocassional shot deep into left and he’s funny lol. You birds shouldn’t hang so many curve balls in the strike zone for him.

You realize Strzok was head of counterintelligence, right? Did you think he worked in the mail room? McCabe was deputy director or whatever his title was. Not sure about Page but she wasn’t hired on for her clerical skills. All three are gone.

I’m probably missing someone and it’s likely the corruption [at the top] is more extensive than we know. Hence the need for another SP.

What would systemic corruption look like to you?
Click to expand...

He reacts the same way to every post. No one is hanging curve balls in the zone; that's lame partisanship on your part. Telling.

"It's likely the corruption at the top is more extensive than we know" is wholly unsupportable. A wild & reckless exaggeration. The parties you mentioned were all dealt with, and that's what a good organization does. There is no way to prevent individual unethical actions, but it's how an agency deals with it that lets us know if it's systemic.

There is absolutely nothing to indicate that it IS systemic, or that there is any conspiracy at all, or attempt to cover up individual actions or protect individuals who have acted inappropriately. Do you have any proof of that whatsoever? Or just reckless, uninformed statements like "It's likely the corruption is more extensive than we know."

Why is that likely? What do you know that we don't?
 
Thing1 said:
He reacts the same way to every post. No one is hanging curve balls in the zone; that's lame partisanship on your part. Telling.

"It's likely the corruption at the top is more extensive than we know" is wholly unsupportable. A wild & reckless exaggeration. The parties you mentioned were all dealt with, and that's what a good organization does. There is no way to prevent individual unethical actions, but it's how an agency deals with it that lets us know if it's systemic.

There is absolutely nothing to indicate that it IS systemic, or that there is any conspiracy at all, or attempt to cover up individual actions or protect individuals who have acted inappropriately. Do you have any proof of that whatsoever? Or just reckless, uninformed statements like "It's likely the corruption is more extensive than we know."

What is that likely? What do you know that we don't?
Click to expand...

What level of players would be involved in systemic corruption?
 
Darth Omar said:
What level of players would be involved in systemic corruption?
Click to expand...

Avoid all of the questions. That's cool.

Level isn't important. It could be the top guy and still not be "systemic." As I said, there is no way to prevent individual unethical actions, but it's how an agency deals with it that lets us know if it's systemic.

We'd need to see an attempt at cover-up, or evidence that there was an attempt to protect guilty parties, or coordinate efforts at different levels of the organization. Your accusations are reckless and completely unsupportable. You know nothing.
 
Thing1 said:
Avoid all of the questions. That's cool.

Level isn't important. It could be the top guy and still not be "systemic." As I said, there is no way to prevent individual unethical actions, but it's how an agency deals with it that lets us know if it's systemic.

We'd need to see an attempt at cover-up, or evidence that there was an attempt to protect guilty parties, or coordinate efforts at different levels of the organization. Your accusations are reckless and completely unsupportable. You know nothing.
Click to expand...

You avoided my question so I avoided yours.

There is plenty of evidence when three very high up individuals are shown the door on account of corruption. If that happened in a major brokerage firm the SEC would give them an anal exam.

But not here? Why not?
 
Thing1 said:
Re: the bolded - he did not do that for MONTHS. And I'm sure there was internal pressure on that.

You are cherrypicking his statements. He has sought to undermine and discredit the FBI and our entire intel community from his 1st day in office. This is not disputable, and you should not be making excuses for it.
Click to expand...
no.
he has always taken the time to mention he is not criticizing "the thousands of FBI agents who go about their job"
Further he went to an FBI graduation for new agents.

Does that sound like he's trashing the FBI? he's going after the LEADERSHIP as he should
 
anatta said:
no.
he has always taken the time to mention he is not criticizing "the thousands of FBI agents who go about their job"
Further he went to an FBI graduation for new agents.

Does that sound like he's trashing the FBI? he's going after the LEADERSHIP as he should
Click to expand...

Here is one of dozens where he didn't mention the rank & file:

"After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters - worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness"

So, no anatta - he does not "always" take the time to do that...
 
Thing1 said:
There is no systemic corruption.

And it's really lame to thank the board lunatic, btw.
Click to expand...

What would it take for you to believe there was systemic corruption?

Do you think it is mere coincidence that in the major things the FBI is involved with from a political nature Strzok was in the middle of it?

Do you think it is insignificant that the decision to exonerate Hillary was made long before they interviewed her contrary to Comey’s claims?
 
Darth Omar said:
You avoided my question so I avoided yours.

There is plenty of evidence when three very high up individuals are shown the door on account of corruption. If that happened in a major brokerage firm the SEC would give them an anal exam.

But not here? Why not?
Click to expand...

The bolded completely undermines the rest of your statement.
 
Thing1 said:
Here is one of dozens where he didn't mention the rank & file:

"After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters - worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness"

So, no anatta - he does not "always" take the time to do that...
Click to expand...

But he does it enough that anyone who follows his Twitter thread knows Trump respects the rank and file.

Unless they cherry pick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top