A question for federal agency integrity buffs

Here is one of dozens where he didn't mention the rank & file:

"After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters - worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness"

So, no anatta - he does not "always" take the time to do that...
did you see the tweet i posted?
He's gone out of his way to discriminate between the rank and file and "leadership" (BTW Comey is leadership)

See if you can find just ONE statement where he criticizes the rank and file in particular -you can't
 
did you see the tweet i posted?
He's gone out of his way to discriminate between the rank and file and "leadership" (BTW Comey is leadership)

See if you can find just ONE statement where he criticizes the rank and file in particular -you can't

That's not merely a goalpost move. That is a goalpost flip.

Here is what you said: "he has always taken the time to mention he is not criticizing "the thousands of FBI agents who go about their job"

He has not always done that. Period.
 
That's not merely a goalpost move. That is a goalpost flip.

Here is what you said: "he has always taken the time to mention he is not criticizing "the thousands of FBI agents who go about their job"

He has not always done that. Period.
JFC Thing..you are going after semantics?
CLEARLY he differentiates between the rank and file ( look at the tweet I posted which is more representative then not of his sentiments) and the leadership.
perhaps not ALWAYS, but on the other hand he's never attacked the rank and file specifically.
 
When individuals have been caught, they have been dealt with.

I don't you think you understand what the term "systemic corruption" means, or entails.

Strzok was exposed by the IG.

Mueller kicked him off the team but didn’t tell anyone until after it was found out.

Do you get tired of defending this stuff?
 
JFC Thing..you are going after semantics?
CLEARLY he differentiates between the rank and file ( look at the tweet I posted which is more representative then not of his sentiments) and the leadership.
perhaps not ALWAYS, but on the other hand he's never attacked the rank and file specifically.

LOL @ "semantics."

It took him months to start differentiating the rank & file. It was actually a story when he finally did. Good on him for finally doing that, but there were literally months of negative, discrediting tweets where he didn't, and I'd be somewhat surprised if he didn't get pressure internally to finally start commenting that he was just talking about leadership.

And even after he started that, it was only sporadic. It is really not disputable that he has sought to discredit and undermine these vital organizations.
 
Strzok was exposed by the IG.

Mueller kicked him off the team but didn’t tell anyone until after it was found out.

Do you get tired of defending this stuff?

And that's what you have for ""It's likely the corruption at the top is more extensive than we know"?

Thanks. I appreciate how honest you've been here.
 
LOL @ "semantics."

It took him months to start differentiating the rank & file. It was actually a story when he finally did. Good on him for finally doing that, but there were literally months of negative, discrediting tweets where he didn't, and I'd be somewhat surprised if he didn't get pressure internally to finally start commenting that he was just talking about leadership.

And even after he started that, it was only sporadic. It is really not disputable that he has sought to discredit and undermine these vital organizations.
this is why you are SUCH a waste of time to deal with.

Semantics..meaning I said "always" when it should have been "mostly". that is NOT moving the goalposts!

No he's always done so, or if he hasn't he's never explicitly attacked the rank and file.
That's a Democratic meme just like " he's trying to discredit Mueller" when he goes after the FBI's email investigation, or the FISA abuse..

When he goes after Mueller, he does it by name.and given the fact this baby was stillborn over collusion,
i'd be doing the same.
It's an illegitimate investigation based on Russian collusion without evidence
 
And that's what you have for ""It's likely the corruption at the top is more extensive than we know"?

Thanks. I appreciate how honest you've been here.
you are in for a rude awakening when the IG report comes out. it has gone over 2.2million documents,and unlike Mueller's follies ,it doesn't require probable cause to do so
 
this is why you are SUCH a waste of time to deal with.

Semantics..meaning I said "always" when it should have been "mostly". that is NOT moving the goalposts!

No he's always done so, or if he hasn't he's never explicitly attacked the rank and file.
That's a Democratic meme just like " he's trying to discredit Mueller" when he goes after the FBI's email investigation, or the FISA abuse..

When he goes after Mueller, he does it by name.and given the fact this baby was stillborn over collusion,
i'd be doing the same.
It's an illegitimate investigation based on Russian collusion without evidence

Hate to be the one to break it to you, but it's not even mostly.

You really have your eyes closed to a lot of what Trump does & says. The spell will break eventually.
 
Over the past months JPP liberals have been hyperventilating about the abuse the FBI and DOJ have taken at the hands of Trump’s twitter account.

Though in each instance it’s not like Trump was making crap up. Rank partisan hacks caught conspiring in text
messages against a sitting president; the failure to prevent the FL school shooting and etc.

At any rate, when the FBI itself, recommended that McCabe be fired as a matter of self-policing—to preserve the integrity of the agency, liberals did everything but applaud the action.

Why?

Vast majority of FBI agents and those actually involved in Trumps cases are Republicans. Rank right wing news has backed every single Trump statement as fact. This is not a partisan investigation , but a legal one.
 
Hate to be the one to break it to you, but it's not even mostly.

You really have your eyes closed to a lot of what Trump does & says. The spell will break eventually.
"a mind is a terrible thing to waste". at one time you were reasonable and able to debate.
Now you hang onto semantics and ignore the larger point such as he's never criticized the rank and file..

Truly you have succumbed to TDS
 
LOL @ "semantics."

It took him months to start differentiating the rank & file. It was actually a story when he finally did. Good on him for finally doing that, but there were literally months of negative, discrediting tweets where he didn't, and I'd be somewhat surprised if he didn't get pressure internally to finally start commenting that he was just talking about leadership.

And even after he started that, it was only sporadic. It is really not disputable that he has sought to discredit and undermine these vital organizations.

It really is funny when the tighty righties use multi-syllable words.
You would think they might look at the definitions first, but then they wouldn't be retards.

Their misuse of hypocrite iseven funnier
 
"a mind is a terrible thing to waste". at one time you were reasonable and able to debate.
Now you hang onto semantics and ignore the larger point such as he's never criticized the rank and file..

Truly you have succumbed to TDS

Seriously, shit fer brains, look up semantic in a dictionary...it doesn't mean what you think.
 
this is why you are SUCH a waste of time to deal with.

Semantics..meaning I said "always" when it should have been "mostly". that is NOT moving the goalposts!

No he's always done so, or if he hasn't he's never explicitly attacked the rank and file.
That's a Democratic meme just like " he's trying to discredit Mueller" when he goes after the FBI's email investigation, or the FISA abuse..

When he goes after Mueller, he does it by name.and given the fact this baby was stillborn over collusion,
i'd be doing the same.
It's an illegitimate investigation based on Russian collusion without evidence

Keep digging the hole. idiot.
 
Strzok was exposed by the IG.

Mueller kicked him off the team but didn’t tell anyone until after it was found out.

Do you get tired of defending this stuff?

Did you see the part about
Mueller kicked him off his team?
Nothing matters after that.

Sorry, not corrupt, the only issue is your selfrighteous indignation.
 
Did you see the part about
Mueller kicked him off his team?
Nothing matters after that.

Sorry, not corrupt, the only issue is your selfrighteous indignation.

If Mueller was the choir boy you claim he is would have been transparent and made an announcement *before* word got out that he was forced to ditch Strzok. To do so would tamp down the criticism his inquisition is a witch hunt.

Don’t waste your time spinning an apology for him.
 
Back
Top