Leading academic shafted by gender studies professor for innocuous joke

Yet it was reported in WaPo and the Daily Mail.
Meh it's frivilous as hell. It's also niave on her part. Lebow is right. This sort of hypersenstivity is counter productive and distracts from more important issues. There are two times you have to accept being made uncomfortable, when some one is being humorous or when they are seeking the truth.

Which, speak of the devil, I'm surprised you haven't posted the debate between Jordan Peterson vs. Ch. 4 Cathy Newman where Peterson (A Canadian psychologist and hardly a right wing ideologue) hands Newman her ass in the debate. Though Newman was a very capable opponent and would probably have unnerved most people and I was impressed with her preparation and her constant attacks and attempts to keep Peterson on the defensive, good debate tactics, I was remarkably unimpressed with Ms. Newman's reasoning, one strawman argument after the other, and was really impressed with how easily Peterson refuted her arguments till he literally left her speechless.

If you haven't seen this debate, and given your hostility towards feminist, you should love this.

 
Meh it's frivilous as hell. It's also niave on her part. Lebow is right. This sort of hypersenstivity is counter productive and distracts from more important issues. There are two times you have to accept being made uncomfortable, when some one is being humorous or when they are seeking the truth.

Which, speak of the devil, I'm surprised you haven't posted the debate between Jordan Peterson vs. Ch. 4 Cathy Newman debate where Peterson (A Canadian psychologist and hardly a right wing ideologue) hands Newman her ass in the debate. Though Newman was a very capable opponent and would probably have unnerved most people and I was impressed with her preparation and her constant attacks and attempts to keep Peterson on the defensive, good debate tactics, I was remarkably unimpressed with Ms. Newman's reasoning, one strawman argument after the other, and how easily Peterson refuted her arguments till he literally left her speechless.

If you haven't seen this debate and given your hostility towards feminist you should love this debate. She was pathetic, he forensically verbally dissected her, she was totally eviscerated.


I posted that on here months back!!

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-gap-and-the-patriarchy&p=2185526#post2185526
 
I obviously missed it.

The irony is how Peterson was villified as a right wing hate monger when he was simply being objective.

But I've had more than one feminist give me a earful cause I had the bad taste to introduce things like, scientific facts of biology, into the discussion. LOL
 
And yet there are certain people here who make indignation over any curtailment whatsoever of their god given right to act like Andrew Dice Clay at a stag show
a preoccupation. Probably the same sort who get caught beating off in public libraries. Republicans to a man.
 
I obviously missed it.

The irony is how Peterson was villified as a right wing hate monger when he was simply being objective.

But I've had more than one feminist give me a earful cause I had the bad taste to introduce things like, scientific facts of biology, into the discussion. LOL

I am not anti-feminist, I am anti gender feminism as opposed to equity feminism.
 
Huh? It's not PC, it's bad science, not science. Make up your mind dude.

You know I used to hate writing but Political Correctness has made it fun again.

You know why? Because I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, to inhibit clarity and with a little practice writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog.

Want to see the title of my next Forum Thread?

The dynamics of interbeing and monological imperatives in Harold and Maude: A study in psychic transgenerational gender modes. (Academia here I come!!!) :)
 
Back
Top