congress says Russia helped Trumpy

Grugore said:
In order to take any of this seriously, you would have to produce at least one voter who would admit to being influenced into voting for Trump. I've never met one. Have you? Has anyone?
Click to expand...

Correct; and so far, all we have is conjecture, allegations and hearsay. I guess Trump has made everyone forget what facts are and evidence is too. :rofl2:
 
Grugore said:
In order to take any of this seriously, you would have to produce at least one voter who would admit to being influenced into voting for Trump. I've never met one. Have you? Has anyone?
Click to expand...

YOU FUCKTARD

YOU BELIEVED THE LIES ABOUT HILARY
 
evince said:
YOU FUCKTARD

YOU BELIEVED THE LIES ABOUT HILARY
Click to expand...

What lies were those? The FACT that she improperly used a private e-mail server to conduct the people's business so as to avoid scrutiny? The FACT that while using a PRIVATE e-mail server to conduct the people's business, she received and sent out classified information? The FACT that while using a PRIVATE e-mail server to conduct the people's business, she destroyed evidence?

Help me out here.
 
evince said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-intel-agrees-with-assessment-that-russia-meddled-to-help-trump/
Click to expand...

Even if this is true, I don't see a problem. Russia can do whatever it wants. It's a sovereign nation. There was no collusian. Even if there was, it's not a crime. You can't indict Trump. You can only try to impeach him. And we've seen how well that worked. LOLOL! Hillary lost because she was a bad candidate. That's the truth. She actually cheated and she still lost in a landslide. You want to know how to win elections? Pick a good candidate. Now, quit your crying and get on with your pathetic existence.
 
Truth Detector said:
What lies were those? The FACT that she improperly used a private e-mail server to conduct the people's business so as to avoid scrutiny? The FACT that while using a PRIVATE e-mail server to conduct the people's business, she received and sent out classified information? The FACT that while using a PRIVATE e-mail server to conduct the people's business, she destroyed evidence?

Help me out here.
Click to expand...

But...but...the RUSSIANS!
 
Grugore said:
Even if this is true, I don't see a problem. Russia can do whatever it wants. It's a sovereign nation. There was no collusian. Even if there was, it's not a crime. You can't indict Trump. You can only try to impeach him. And we've seen how well that worked. LOLOL! Hillary lost because she was a bad candidate. That's the truth. She actually cheated and she still lost in a landslide. You want to know how to win elections? Pick a good candidate. Now, quit your crying and get on with your pathetic existence.
Click to expand...
see



no American would say its ok for Russia to ruin our elections
 
evince said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-intel-agrees-with-assessment-that-russia-meddled-to-help-trump/
Click to expand...

Senate Intel agrees with assessment that Russia meddled to help Trump


The Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that found Russia interfered in the 2016 election in an effort to help President Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton is "a sound intelligence product." The newly released, unclassified 7-page report -- whose conclusions the Republican-led committee previewed in May -- put to rest some questions that had arisen about the integrity of the assessment and the political agenda of the agencies that authored it.
"The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions," said Chairman Richard Burr, R-North Carolina, in a statement accompanying the report's release. "The Committee continues its investigation and I am hopeful that this installment of the Committee's work will soon be followed by additional summaries providing the American people with clarity around Russia's activities regarding U.S. elections."
In its report, the committee said it had conducted numerous interviews with senior intelligence officials and reviewed the analytic procedures that informed the ICA, which was commissioned by former President Barack Obama in late 2016. The committee's report stated unequivocally that it concurred with the ICA's assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign aimed at the election, and that he and the Russian government had developed "a clear preference for President-elect Trump."
It also said that further details have come to light that "bolster" the ICA's findings about the extent of Russia's efforts to undermine the U.S.-led liberal international order and hinted at new findings by the committee that have "exposed a far more extensive Russian effort to manipulate social media outlets to sow discord."



the republican base now places putin over country
 
evince said:
Senate Intel agrees with assessment that Russia meddled to help Trump


The Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that found Russia interfered in the 2016 election in an effort to help President Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton is "a sound intelligence product." The newly released, unclassified 7-page report -- whose conclusions the Republican-led committee previewed in May -- put to rest some questions that had arisen about the integrity of the assessment and the political agenda of the agencies that authored it.
"The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions," said Chairman Richard Burr, R-North Carolina, in a statement accompanying the report's release. "The Committee continues its investigation and I am hopeful that this installment of the Committee's work will soon be followed by additional summaries providing the American people with clarity around Russia's activities regarding U.S. elections."
In its report, the committee said it had conducted numerous interviews with senior intelligence officials and reviewed the analytic procedures that informed the ICA, which was commissioned by former President Barack Obama in late 2016. The committee's report stated unequivocally that it concurred with the ICA's assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign aimed at the election, and that he and the Russian government had developed "a clear preference for President-elect Trump."
It also said that further details have come to light that "bolster" the ICA's findings about the extent of Russia's efforts to undermine the U.S.-led liberal international order and hinted at new findings by the committee that have "exposed a far more extensive Russian effort to manipulate social media outlets to sow discord."



the republican base now places putin over country
Click to expand...

Time to face the truth. Hillary lost because she was a crooked piece of shit. I did not vote for Trump because of the Russians. I voted for him because I would honestly put a bullet in my head rather than vote for that bitch.
 
SHUT UP, YOU SMELLY LYING MULE TURD COCK BALLS DINGLE BERRY RUSSIAN BOT TRAITOR TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUTIN LOVE SLAVE WHORE BASKET
 
Grugore said:
Time to face the truth. Hillary lost because she was a crooked piece of shit. I did not vote for Trump because of the Russians. I voted for him because I would honestly put a bullet in my head rather than vote for that bitch.
Click to expand...

how Russian of you
 
Grugore said:
Time to face the truth. Hillary lost because she was a crooked piece of shit. I did not vote for Trump because of the Russians. I voted for him because I would honestly put a bullet in my head rather than vote for that bitch.
Click to expand...


You know bullets are still fairly cheap
 
Yaya said:
It is a huge distinction. The fact you don't think so says a lot about you.
Click to expand...

It's a distinction without a difference. The fact that it's the only objection you can come up with, yet you cling to it tooth and nail, says a lot about you.

"Your honor, witnesses have claimed that my client tried to break into the bank, but we don't know for sure that he succeeded because nobody saw him inside stuffing cash into his swag sack. The fact that some money happens to have gone missing could have any number of causes. I move to dismiss."
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
It's a distinction without a difference. The fact that it's the only objection you can come up with, yet you cling to it tooth and nail, says a lot about you.

"Your honor, witnesses have claimed that my client tried to break into the bank, but we don't know for sure that he succeeded because nobody saw him inside stuffing cash into his swag sack. The fact that some money happens to have gone missing could have any number of causes. I move to dismiss."
Click to expand...

Did I say it was the only objection?
 
evince said:
see



no American would say its ok for Russia to ruin our elections
Click to expand...

How did Russia ruin the election? Oh. I see. Hillary lost. That's why you're wigging out. Ahh...a bag of roasted peanuts, a cold beer, and a triggered liberal going ballistic. Doesn't get any better than this.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
It's a distinction without a difference. The fact that it's the only objection you can come up with, yet you cling to it tooth and nail, says a lot about you.

"Your honor, witnesses have claimed that my client tried to break into the bank, but we don't know for sure that he succeeded because nobody saw him inside stuffing cash into his swag sack. The fact that some money happens to have gone missing could have any number of causes. I move to dismiss."
Click to expand...

funny thing is Its right in the articles title


I proved it already


these are not real people

they are bots or Russians


No American would say the things these posters are saying now
 
Grugore said:
How did Russia ruin the election? Oh. I see. Hillary lost. That's why you're wigging out. Ahh...a bag of roasted peanuts, a cold beer, and a triggered liberal going ballistic. Doesn't get any better than this.
Click to expand...

you have been provided the evidence


you just keep pretending its not there
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top