Why I don’t believe Fords story

Mason Margot said:
You weren't there,if it was a Democrat,you would say the opposite.
Click to expand...

8SWqij0.gif
 
Thing1 said:
Do you think it's that easy for an alleged victim who was extremely reluctant to even report this to begin with?

No emotional or life considerations there? From what I heard, her family already had to move.
Click to expand...
absolutely not easy=emotional and life considerations for both people
...but this was her choice. She knew what could possibly happen....Now it's her responsibility to follow through....*
I'm sure she spoke with others before she sent the info...she was ill advised by‘ those who told her to proceed...especially with the story she's given.... and how it was "leaked".‘
It would be impossible not to feel very sorry for her....*
 
TOP said:
absolutely not easy=emotional and life considerations for both people
...but this was her choice. She knew what could possibly happen....Now it's her responsibility to follow through....*
I'm sure she spoke with others before she sent the info...she was ill advised by‘ those who told her to proceed...especially with the story she's given.... and how it was "leaked".‘
It would be impossible not to feel very sorry for her....*
Click to expand...

It's as easy as it happened or it didn't happened.
If it did happen.He isn't qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice
 
Grumpy said:
Funny how you want to delay the conformation until after the mid term elections. Hoping you will win God you people are so fucking transparent.
Click to expand...

Why is there a rush to get Bretty seated?

Shouldn't the American people have a say in 7 weeks?

There's no need to rush Bretty through. SCOTUS will still be there in January.
 
LV426 said:
Why is there a rush to get Bretty seated?

Shouldn't the American people have a say in 7 weeks?

There's no need to rush Bretty through. SCOTUS will still be there in January.
Click to expand...

There is no rush this is the normal conformation time it takes. Why delay something because some bimbo comes out of the woodwork makes claims she isn't sure of. Don't like it get the rules changed.
 
LV426 said:
How so?

Teenagers were sexually assaulted by Catholic priests 40 years ago, the FBI investigates. According to you, it's not necessary to investigate that because it happened 40 years ago.

But you're saying these are apples-to-oranges, but how? In both cases, the victims were teenagers; in both cases, the incidents happened 40 years ago. Yet you say these aren't similar? How so? Both involve teenage victims of sexual assault 40 years ago.

So you don't think the victims of Catholic priests were really victims, do you? It's OK to admit that you don't.
Click to expand...

They are collectively supporting the accusations.

Ford, not so much. :D
 
Phantasmal said:
Fantasy? She remembers she was assaulted. She told others about the assault. People like you are the reason women don’t come forward with their stories.
Click to expand...

the odd part is that there was a party with only four boys present, yet she wasn't able to identify the person who did it until he was named to the SC thirty five years later.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top