Why I don’t believe Fords story

Shallon Margot said:
Not revenge,fair play.
Click to expand...

Bullshit; because fair play is a two way street and you, the DNC, and liberals already FEEL that she's telling the truth and Kavanaugh is guilty.

At least be honest; because if this wasn't about revenge, then liberals would keep bring up Garland, Hill, or others.

:truestory:
 
Bottom line right now is: One side is asking for an FBI investigation to find out if more can be found...and the other side is doing everything it can to prevent the FBI from investigating and finding more.

The charge was made by Ford who knew Kavanaugh...and knew Judge whom she identified as a witness and an enabler. One side wants Judge to testify and one side does not.

Which side is acting more like the party trying to hide something?
 
Frank Apisa said:
Bottom line right now is: One side is asking for an FBI investigation to find out if more can be found...and the other side is doing everything it can to prevent the FBI from investigating and finding more.

The charge was made by Ford who knew Kavanaugh...and knew Judge whom she identified as a witness and an enabler. One side wants Judge to testify and one side does not.

Which side is acting more like the party trying to hide something?
Click to expand...
Well, we already now that one of her former classmates already posted multiple lies about the situation....and then removed them all, when confronted....Said she just made things up because it empowered her....
How many more of ford's classmates are willing to lie for the "cause"‘?
makes you wonder how far people will stretch the truth for the "good of others"....doesn't it?
 
TOP said:
Well, we already now that one of her former classmates already posted multiple lies about the situation....and then removed them all, when confronted....Said she just made things up because it empowered her....
How many more of ford's classmates are willing to lie for the "cause"‘?
makes you wonder how far people will stretch the truth for the "good of others"....doesn't it?
Click to expand...

How many of those she said were there and saw something that she alleged happen don't remember the party ever occurring?

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.” - Patrick Smyth, former classmate of Brett Kavanaugh
 
jimmymccready said:
Hint: the Senate hearing is not a court.

Hint: the military uses polygraphs to help commanders decide if they want to push charges.

Hint: you don't know what you are talking about in this context.
Click to expand...

so you are in favor of a set of laws removing all protections we already enjoy?....
 
Last edited:
CFM said:
How many of those she said were there and saw something that she alleged happen don't remember the party ever occurring?

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.” - Patrick Smyth, former classmate of Brett Kavanaugh
Click to expand...
No one remembers the party....she remembers some "incident"....which could have happened any time in high school. anywhere. with anyone.
She found someone to blame all these years later...when she felt she needed to feel "empowered" during therapy.......
Strangest situation Ever....
 
TOP said:
No one remembers the party....she remembers some "incident"....which could have happened any time in high school. anywhere. with anyone.
She found someone to blame all these years later...when she felt she needed to feel "empowered" during therapy.......
Strangest situation Ever....
Click to expand...

From what I've heard, she was known to be a boozer. My State's laws, something those automatically believing this ho would likely support, make it illegal to use a firearm when intoxicated. However, they'll believe someone that was a party girl because of their hate for Trump.
 
Teflon Don said:
Here is why I don’t believe her

1) She claims she didn’t want this to come out yet SHE reached out to a democrat AND the Washington Post. Nobody who wants to stay anonymous does that

2) She claims she wants to be anonymous yet in August she hires a lawyer. Why? If she never planned on it going public why did she hire a lawyer?

3) She claims she wanted to be anonymous and not go public yet she supposedly took a lie detector test. Why? Who does that?
Click to expand...

You left out number 4.

"4) I don't want to believe her."
 
Darth Omar said:
Well, why should we?

Her account is hardly airtight and all of the back and forth with preconditions over testifying isn’t helping any.
Click to expand...

Didn't say you should believe her, just that you prefer not to. What you should want is the better way to get at the truth. But you don't want that either.
 
jacka said:
Didn't say you should believe her, just that you prefer not to. What you should want is the better way to get at the truth. But you don't want that either.
Click to expand...

There’s no getting to the truth when the people involved have totally different accounts.

It was 35 years ago and there’s absolutely no evidence that Kavanaugh is anything like a Ted Kennedy or whatever. Just the opposite in fact. There’s every indication he’s an outstanding individual. Ironically, even a good role model for young males.

Does that count for anything?
 
When do people on different sides of a question not have different accounts? The way we resolve different accounts, when it matters, is to examine them. It is possible a serious investigation won't get to the bottom of it but unless it is tried we will never know, and the question will hang there always.
 
jacka said:
When do people on different sides of a question not have different accounts? The way we resolve different accounts, when it matters, is to examine them. It is possible a serious investigation won't get to the bottom of it but unless it is tried we will never know, and the question will hang there always.
Click to expand...

It’s too late to worry about the question that will always hang over Kavanaugh’s head.

There is no ‘serious’ investigation to be had. They can only talk to people who weren’t there when whatever happened, happened—or didn’t happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top