Why We Need Gun Restrictions

You obviously have a very low opinion of life, or at least your pathetic version of what is called "life". Then again, since you are of the right wing you just parrot what you are told.

When faced with two, or three, heavily armed personnel in body armor, you will give up you daughter, and get on your knees, and whine "don't shoot me".

If you ever face 3 dudes in body armor and you only have your daughter with you...you did something wrong.
 
You obviously have a very low opinion of life, or at least your pathetic version of what is called "life". Then again, since you are of the right wing you just parrot what you are told.

When faced with two, or three, heavily armed personnel in body armor, you will give up you daughter, and get on your knees, and whine "don't shoot me".

I see you are a natural born pussy and you project what you would do in a situation onto others. I dn't have kids but if I did you are fucking insane if you think I would give up my own blood to anyone. I would fucking massacre anyone that tried to come between me and my family. you should be ashamed of how much a pussy you are to not defend those you love.
 
I see you are a natural born pussy and you project what you would do in a situation onto others. I dn't have kids but if I did you are fucking insane if you think I would give up my own blood to anyone. I would fucking massacre anyone that tried to come between me and my family. you should be ashamed of how much a pussy you are to not defend those you love.

He thinks it's all about crime.
 
If yu remember the incident, and I am sure you don't, the cops didn't take the time to find out. They killed the kid in less then 30 seconds after arriving on the scene.

I think in general you're a dumb fuckstick but in this case you're right. They did not give that kid a chance. It's on video and some people still don't care.
 
I see you are a natural born pussy and you project what you would do in a situation onto others. I dn't have kids but if I did you are fucking insane if you think I would give up my own blood to anyone. I would fucking massacre anyone that tried to come between me and my family. you should be ashamed of how much a pussy you are to not defend those you love.

Just adding to your bravado with your words of cowardice is sign enough of the coward you are. This says all that is needed to be said: I am certain you have never served in the military, have never taken a life, nor do you have any concept of hos little a gun is worth when faced with the choice of keeping it, or giving it up.

Keep talking girlie man, you are what you are.
 
I think in general you're a dumb fuckstick but in this case you're right. They did not give that kid a chance. It's on video and some people still don't care.

The one officer had been diagnosed as "unstable", and not qualified to be a cop. And still the jury acquitted the guy.
 
If you ever face 3 dudes in body armor and you only have your daughter with you...you did something wrong.

I waqs referencing some agency like the ATF coming to get your guns. Guess I should have made it clearer for the "dumb fuckstcks" to comprehend. Have to be more careful considering the low IQ members of JPP.
 
I waqs referencing some agency like the ATF coming to get your guns. Guess I should have made it clearer for the "dumb fuckstcks" to comprehend. Have to be more careful considering the low IQ members of JPP.

Alright. Way to play it back. Props.

My point was the Second is military in nature, it's not about protecting yourself from criminals.
 
The right wing will never admit it since common sense is not their forte, however, this is a good example of why we do need more restrictions. And please, for the useful idiot toadies, don't try to make this into gun confiscation like you NRA masters have told you:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/killed-sh...o-shows-florida-store-owner/story?id=58506648

I am curious; how do we currently NOT have gun restrictions? I am betting that this Lakeland city commissioner bought the weapon legally and it is registered to him. Do you have any proof that it is not?

Are you as upset by the fact that this shoplifter was stealing from the shop owner? Or is that okay with you? Why was he stealing a hatchet? Did you not find that disturbing?
 
I've never been a big 10th Amendment / States Rights guy as few progressive liberals are.

Certain things like civil liberties must be enforced by strong central national authority.

giphy.gif

The Democrat ideology
giphy.gif
 
Mandatory background check for one.

They do instant background checks in Florida for every handgun purchase.

Making "bump stocks" illegal for another instead of allowing the NRA to sell them.

Bump stocks weren't used in this case. The guy had a HANDGUN you dunce. Also, the NRA does not sell them, you dunce.

Most of those 20,000 laws are only for specific areas, and do not apply to all areas.

So what areas do they not apply? Would 30,000 work? What criminals obey laws, dunce?

Then you have areas like Florida with its phony ass "stand your ground" laws.

So you don't believe that a law abiding citizen being assaulted by a criminal predator has a right to defend themselves? Why, dunce?

What is painfully obvious, as is with most leftists, is that you don't have the slightest clue about our laws or what you are emotionally erupting about. But what we will NOT do is allow criminal predators to prey on citizens without protection.
 
....but the efficacy of laws that's at issue.

What efficacy would that be snowflake?

The issue is, how do we legislate keeping guns out of the hand of maniacs like the Sandy Hook, and Virginia Tech shooters, while preserving our 2nd Amendment rights for the rest of us.

What laws would have prevented the Sandy Hook or Virginia Tech shootings? Be specific. For that matter, any of the mass shootings we experienced here.

Are you too stupid to know thaat? Or are you merely acting like it?

I think you are too big of a moron to comprehend that YOU are the one who is too stupid. ;)
 
And I can link to several where a "good guy" killed like 50+ from the 32nd. story of a Las Vegas hotel. Or where another "good guy" killed 20 plus high school students. How about the "good guy" that killed a shop lifter.

What laws would have prevented those shootings snowflake?
 
Alright. Way to play it back. Props.

My point was the Second is military in nature, it's not about protecting yourself from criminals.

Bull Shit! Are we to believe YOUR OPINION as protected by the 1st amendment or the actual authors and those who ratified the 2nd amendment as to why the "right to bear arms" is a protected right of THE PEOPLE?

Sam Adams: "The Constitution should never be construed to prevent the people of the US, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms...…."

Lets see what "FISHER AMES" the framer of the 2nd amendment itself has to say on the subject of stopping the average citizen from having the right to bear arms: "The right of bearing arms.....is to be inherent in the people."

Richard H. Lee (signer of the declaration of Independence): THE ADVANTAGE OF BEING ARMED IS AN ADVANTAGE WHICH THE AMERICAN CITIZEN POSSESS THAT NO OTHER CITIZEN ON EARTH POSSESS...….

Then we have that pesky little thing called the US CONSTITUTION and the countless precedent establishing decisions from SCOTUS that have upheld the original intent and right of the 2nd amendment....EVERY TIME that some leftist challenges it.

But....just like the leftist social fascist HILTER....I can see why the left wants to remove the right to bear arms from THE PEOPLE. Its a most difficult thing to take over a constitutional republic that does not support MOB RULE when THE PEOPLE have the option to protect their lives and property with FORCE.

Personally: I can't wait until the left wing BROWN SHIRTS (Antifa) encounters the wrong individuals and attempts to violently bully him/her....when the victim has a full clip CLOCK (17 rounds) locked and loaded. The result will be up to 17 dead left wing thugs wounded or dying in the streets. Its not a matter of IF this will happened, its only a matter of time BEFORE IT HAPPEENS....and the US RULE OF LAW acquits the shooter. Let the left wing riots begin.
 
Last edited:
The right wing will never admit it since common sense is not their forte, however, this is a good example of why we do need more restrictions. And please, for the useful idiot toadies, don't try to make this into gun confiscation like you NRA masters have told you:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/killed-sh...o-shows-florida-store-owner/story?id=58506648

Wouldn't they need their guns so they can shoot 'mouthy black kids' in the head whenever they feel like it.

Surely you endorse that.
 
Hey dickhead, the question was "What new restrictions would deter criminals from using a firearm in the commission of a crime?"
All those silly restrictions you mention won't deter criminals, just hinder law abiding citizens.

Stupid fuck. When the criminals are in federal prison for 25 years, they don’t commit crimes.

How are you hindered, dumbfuck?
 
This man will likely be going to prison, that is the current law functioning the way it's supposed to. And in favor of the victim in question.

Had the thief been wielding and brandishing a weapon, that'd be different and frankly the shopowner should have the legal right to self-defense in that event.

So if you are a shop owner; you should stand by, allow the thief's to steal whatever they wish, call the police and hope that someday they will catch him?
 
says the fucktard idiot who believes that government is more suited to protect us than ourselves. the founders would have hung you. go look up your inalienable rights, moron.


There are no such thing as inalienable rights, dumbshit.

Find that term in the Constitution, idiot. Then, get back to me.
 
Back
Top